Extended Data Fig. 3: Details about co-developments of indicators related to public health, the environment, and livelihoods in the Chinese food system under the FSTSDP_China, and three package scenarios.
From: Bundled measures for China’s food system transformation reveal social and environmental co-benefits
a, Co-developments of indicators under the FSTSDP_China scenario. b, Co-developments of indicators under the Diets scenario. c, Co-developments of indicators under the SustEnvironment scenario. d, Co-developments of indicators under the Livelihoods scenario. The red color indicates a trade-off between two indicators, while the green color indicates a co-benefit. The grey color suggests no interaction between the two indicators in this scenario. The purple color indicates both indicators are deteriorating in the respective scenario. A plus sign following the indicator’s name suggests that a higher value is favorable, while a minus sign indicates that a lower value is preferable. Notably, drivers of these co-developments are the measures within the respective policy set and we do not imply any direct correlations between each pair of indicators.
