Situating digital agriculture within recent histories of uneven agrarian development reveals its potential to perpetuate injustice. To avoid this outcome, we argue for innovation processes that centre the needs, knowledge and priorities of communities who work the land.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Against ‘technology adoption’: troubling a dominant concept through biodiverse farmers’ in-difference to digital agriculture
Agriculture and Human Values Open Access 26 January 2026
-
Reviewing the evidence on precision agriculture and environmental sustainability
npj Sustainable Agriculture Open Access 21 January 2026
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Cochrane, W. W. The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis 2nd edn (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1993).
Howard, P. H. Concentration and Power in the Food System: Who Controls What We Eat? (Bloomsbury, 2016)
Hackfort, S., Marquis, S. & Bronson, K. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241234279 (2024).
Bronson, K. The Immaculate Conception of Data: Agribusiness, Activists, and Their Shared Politics of the Future (McGillQueen’s Univ. Press, 2022).
Rotz, S. et al. J. Rural Stud. 68, 112–122 (2019).
Montenegro deWit, M. & Canfield, M. J. Peasant Stud. 51, 381–420 (2024).
Fairbairn, M. & Kish, Z. New Media Soc. 25, 1935–1959 (2023).
Abdulai, A.-R. J. Dev. Stud. 58, 1588–1604 (2022).
Brooks, S. Econ. Soc. 50, 374–396 (2021).
Gurumurthy, A., Chami, N. & Kumar R. Recasting Land Tenure Rights in the Data Epoch: Insights from a Country Case Study of India (IT for Change, 2022); https://go.nature.com/4hK0ar1
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. Res. Policy 42, 1568–1580 (2013).
Steinke, J. et al. Agric. Syst. 215, 103882 (2024).
McCampbell, M., Schumann, C. & Klerkx, L. Sociol. Ruralis 62, 279–304 (2022).
Faxon, H. O. Agric. Hum. Values 40, 897–911 (2023).
Doyle, J., Metelerkamp, L., Sango, E. & Jumah, R. Digitalisation and Agroecological Markets in Africa (AFSA, 2022); https://go.nature.com/4i7IllA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
H.O.F. received funding from Facebook Research to conduct research on digital literacy, demographics and misinformation in Myanmar. Facebook had no control, oversight or involvement in the research process and did not review the results. This source of funding did not affect the study’s findings or analysis. S.-L.R. has unpaid advisory roles with LiteFarm (since 2020) and OpenTEAM (since 2022). Nonetheless the views expressed here are those of the authors and not of these organizations. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Food thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fairbairn, M., Faxon, H.O., Montenegro de Wit, M. et al. Digital agriculture will perpetuate injustice unless led from the grassroots. Nat Food 6, 312–315 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01137-8
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01137-8
This article is cited by
-
Reviewing the evidence on precision agriculture and environmental sustainability
npj Sustainable Agriculture (2026)
-
Against ‘technology adoption’: troubling a dominant concept through biodiverse farmers’ in-difference to digital agriculture
Agriculture and Human Values (2026)