Table 1 Effect of functional richness (FR) and time from rotation implementation on calorie and macronutrient outputs, when forage is used for milk production

From: Functionally rich crop rotations increase calorie and macronutrient outputs across Europe

Coefficients—forage for milk (equation (3))

Predictors

Units

(1) Calorie (Gcal ha−1 yr−1)

(2) Carbohydrate (kg ha−1 yr−1)

(3) Protein (kg ha−1 yr−1)

(4) Fat (kg ha−1 yr−1)

Estimate

s.e.

P

Estimate

s.e.

P

Estimate

s.e.

P

Estimate

s.e.

P

\({\beta }_{0}\)

Intercept

Gcal ha−1 yr−1 or kg ha−1 yr−1

3.3

0.19

<0.001

47.8

2.26

<0.001

18.9

1.2

<0.001

8.8

1.4

<0.001

\({\beta }_{t}\)

Time

Gcal ha−1 yr−2 or kg ha−1 yr−2

−8.2

2.38

<0.001

−156.0

32.0

<0.001

−43.0

14.2

0.003

19.9

12.9

0.125

\({\beta }_{{t}^{2}}\)

Time2

Gcal ha−1 yr−3 or kg ha−1 yr−3

10.7

2.40

<0.001

125.0

32.7

<0.001

67.3

14.2

<0.001

64.8

13.3

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{1{\rm{C}}}}\)

FR 1C

Gcal ha−1 yr−1 or kg ha−1 yr−1

−0.29

0.02

<0.001

−4.92

0.27

<0.001

−2.3

0.10

<0.001

0.45

0.11

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{2}}\)

FR 2

Gcal ha−1 yr−1 or kg ha−1 yr−1

−0.49

0.02

<0.001

−12.3

0.30

<0.001

−1.4

0.11

<0.001

4.4

0.12

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{3}}\)

FR 3

Gcal ha−1 yr−1 or kg ha−1 yr−1

1.7

0.03

<0.001

5.36

0.35

<0.001

14.5

0.14

<0.001

23.6

0.15

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{1{\rm{C}}}t}\)

Time:FR 1C

Gcal ha−1 yr−2 or kg ha−1 yr−2

15.0

2.31

<0.001

282.0

32.4

<0.001

89.8

13.0

<0.001

−0.07

13.9

0.996

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{1{\rm{C}}}{t}^{2}}\)

Time2:FR 1C

Gcal ha−1 yr−3 or kg ha−1 yr−3

−14.5

2.44

<0.001

−227.0

34.2

<0.001

−65.3

13.7

<0.001

−27.1

14.7

0.064

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{2}t}\)

Time:FR 2

Gcal ha−1 yr−2 or kg ha−1 yr−2

2.68

2.27

0.238

126.0

32.0

<0.001

−20.1

12.8

0.116

−67.8

13.7

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{2}{t}^{2}}\)

Time2:FR 2

Gcal ha−1 yr−3 or kg ha−1 yr−3

−0.31

2.40

0.897

16.1

33.7

0.634

−15.3

13.6

0.259

−22.3

14.4

0.121

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{3}t}\)

Time:FR 3

Gcal ha−1 yr−2 or kg ha−1 yr−2

16.8

2.69

<0.001

136.0

37.6

<0.001

125.0

15.3

<0.001

97.3

15.9

<0.001

\({\beta }_{{\mathrm{FR}}_{3}{t}^{2}}\)

Time2:FR 3

Gcal ha−1 yr−3 or kg ha−1 yr−3

−23.5

2.61

<0.001

−231.0

36.5

<0.001

−161.0

14.9

<0.001

−164.0

15.4

<0.001

Marginal R2

0.28

0.13

0.41

0.56

Conditional R2

0.72

0.61

0.80

0.84

  1. Fitted model parameters for the square-rooted annual outputs (equation (3)): (1) calories (Gcal ha−1 yr−1), (2) carbohydrates (kg ha−1 yr−1), (3) proteins (kg ha−1 yr−1) and (4) fats (kg ha−1 yr−1). The intercept is the output of cereal monocultures at time 0 (FR 1M). The two-sided P values were determined using Satterthwaite’s approximation to calculate the degrees of freedom. The marginal R2 is the variation explained by the fixed factors alone, while the conditional R2 is the variation explained by the entire model including fixed and random factors.