Extended Data Fig. 2: αCD25NIB depletes Tregs and drives effector immune responses. | Nature Cancer

Extended Data Fig. 2: αCD25NIB depletes Tregs and drives effector immune responses.

From: CD25-Treg-depleting antibodies preserving IL-2 signaling on effector T cells enhance effector activation and antitumor immunity

Extended Data Fig. 2

C57BL6 mice were injected with 500,000 MC38 tumor cells. Once tumors were palpable, on day 7, mice were injected IP with αPC61/αCD25NIB/αCD25NIB + αIL2 (200μg). Tumors and LN were harvested on day 15 post-tumor inoculation and processed as described in materials and methods section. (a) Graph showing % FoxP3+ cells of total CD4+ cells. (b) Absolute number of Tregs shown as number of Tregs/g of tumor. p-value=0.0003 between No Tx and αCD25NIB group. ****=p-value <0.0001 (c) Ratio of effector T cells over Tregs. For CD8/Treg ratio, P-value between No tx versus αCD25NIB=0.0008, and between No tx and αCD25NIB + αIL2 =0.0045. For CD4 Eff/Treg ratio, p-value between no tx and /αCD25PC61 = 0.0056, between No tx and αCD25NIB=0.0002, between no tx and αCD25NIB + αIL2=0.0001. For NK/Treg ratio, p-value=0.0001 for no tx versus αCD25PC61, 0.0010 for no tx versus αCD25NIB and 0.0004 for No tx versus αCD25NIB + αIL2. (d) Representative FACS plots showing Granzyme B expression versus Ki67 expression in CD8, CD4 effectors and NK cells. (e) Graph showing percentage of Granzyme B+ cells in different effector subsets. (f) Graph showing the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of Granzyme of the effector cells plotted in (e). For CD8 cells, p-value between No tx group and αCD25NIB =0.0001. For CD4 Eff, p-values between No tx versus αCD25NIB =0.0007, for αCD25NIB versus αCD25PC61=0.0009, and between αCD25NIB and αCD25NIB + αIL2 group= 0.0002. For NK cells, p-value between No tx group and αCD25NIB group=0.0164 and between αCD25NIB and αCD25NIB + αIL2 group=0.0280. Quantification plots: mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (ns=p>0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).

Source data

Back to article page