Extended Data Fig. 4: Oxidative damage-associated mutational signatures. | Nature Cancer

Extended Data Fig. 4: Oxidative damage-associated mutational signatures.

From: A systematic CRISPR screen defines mutational mechanisms underpinning signatures caused by replication errors and endogenous DNA damage

Extended Data Fig. 4

a, Relative mutation frequency of G>T/C>A in 256 possible channels which take two adjacent bases 5’ and 3’ of each mutated base (4×4×4×4=256) for ∆ATP2B4, ∆OGG1, a head and neck cancer with strong SBS18 and SBS18. b, Left: tSNE plot of tissue-specific mutational signature 18. Two groups are featured with predominant peaks at TGC>TTC/GCA>GAA (highlighted in green) and AGA>ATA/TCT>TAT (highlighted in purple), respectively. Right: heatmap of 21 tissue-specific mutational signatures at C>A. We compared experimental signatures to previously published cancer-derived signatures, focusing on 21 tissue-specific variations of Signature 18. Interestingly, we found two distinct groups of Signature 18. Signatures of ∆OGG1, cellular models and signatures derived from head and neck tumors, pancreas, myeloid, bladder, uterus, cervix, lymphoid tumors were most similar to each other, with the predominant G>T/C>A peak at TGC>TTC/GCA>GAA. By contrast, an alternative version of this signature with a predominant G>T/C>A peak at AGA>ATA/TCT>TAT was noted in colorectal, esophagus, stomach, bone, lung, CNS, breast, skin, prostate, liver, head and neck tumors (Signature Head_neck_G), ovary, biliary and kidney cancers. Indeed, there are many types of oxidative species which could fluctuate between tissues, variably affecting trinucleotides resulting in the variation observed in Signature 18.

Source data

Back to article page