Fig. 1: Comparison of chemically doped PBTTT thin films with conventional and newly developed dopants. | Communications Materials

Fig. 1: Comparison of chemically doped PBTTT thin films with conventional and newly developed dopants.

From: Supramolecular cocrystals built through redox-triggered ion intercalation in π-conjugated polymers

Fig. 1

a Illustration of chemical doping of a PBTTT thin film. b Chemical structures of employed dopants and (c) their reported redox potentials accompanied with the approximate valence band top of PBTTT. d UV-Vis-NIR spectra, e conductivities, and (f) photoelectron yield spectroscopy measurements for pristine (black), F4TCNQ (blue), Mo(tfd-COCF3)3 (green), Li-TFSI via anion-exchange (orange), and TBPA-TFSI (red) doped PBTTT thin films. The error bars in the conductivities represent the uncertainty in the thickness of the PBTTT thin films and represent one standard deviation.

Back to article page