Table 1 Summary of Life Cycle Assessment drivers and results for enhanced rock weathering deployment across twelve nations.

From: Environmental and health impacts of atmospheric CO2 removal by enhanced rock weathering depend on nations’ energy mix

Main drivers

 

CHN

IND

USA

BRA

CAN

IDN

MEX

FRA

DEU

ESP

POL

ITA

Average CDR contribution per country (%)5

 

27%

25%

21%

9%

3%

3%

3%

3%

3%

2%

1%

1%

Average reduction in silicate demand5

BAU to 2 °C

−4%

−18%

−10%

−7%

−29%

−13%

−11%

0.0%

−13%

0.0%

−8%

−9%

Electricity mix carbon coefficients reduction 2050, LCA based on19

BAU to 2 °C

−56%

−54%

−67%

−69%

−84%

−53%

−47%

10%

−21%

0%

−23%

−15%

Average energy increase (Pj) for rock grinding

BAU to 2 °C

107%

23%

50%

24%

−25%

83%

16%

0.1%

−14%

4%

0.4%

5%

Average supply chain energy demand (kwh/t) including average transport distances (LCA)

BAU

210.5

245.5

283.5

186.4

256.5

250.1

283.5

386.5

307.3

275.3

326.5

270.7

2 °C

338.0

334.7

368.4

215.8

265.6

295.1

368.4

386.9

302.1

281.1

350.7

297.1

Maximun Basalt Transport Distances per country for BAU and 2 °C scenarios

Roads km

1401

977

1450

1879

2217

2024

1075

915

681

676

1034

553

Rails km

898

1246

1692

705

1498

218

548

821

735

895

1085

680

End-point indicators

Mid-point indicators

CHN

IND

USA

BRA

CAN

IDN

MEX

FRA

DEU

ESP

POL

ITA

Resource depletion

MDP

FDP

WDP

Ecosystems

TAP100

FETPinf

METPinf

TETPinf

FEP

MEP

ALOP

ULOP

NLTP

GWP100

Human health

GWP100

HTPinf

IRP_HE

ODPinf

PMFP

POFP

  1. We appropriate, results show the change from the business as usual (BAU) to the 2 °C energy scenario, averaged across the 0.5–2 Gt CO2 yr−1 CO2 draw-down goals. Effect of ERW on Mid-Point impact categories per hectare across the transition from BAU to 2 °C energy scenario is summarised for each country as follows: ↓ reduction >30%, reduction 5% and 30%, ↔ between 5% and −5%, increase 5% and 30% and ↑ increase >30%.