Table 1 Project size, credits, and baseline percent of Common Practice by ownership type for ARB-credited IFM projects included in the study (n = 90).
From: Little evidence of management change in California’s forest offset program
Owner Class | All | Corporate | TIMO/REIT | Tribal | Family | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of projects | 90 | 21 | 17 | 14 | 7 | 31 | |
Percent of total projects | 100% | 23.3% | 18.9% | 15.6% | 7.8% | 34.4% | |
Hectares | Mean | 18,055 | 11,297 | 24,230 | 32,220 | 2092 | 16,454 |
Min | 216 | 890 | 909 | 263 | 622 | 216 | |
Max | 204,110 | 46,559 | 113,651 | 204,110 | 5009 | 183,415 | |
Sum | 1,624,919 | 237,235 | 411,902 | 451,077 | 14,645 | 510,061 | |
Percent of total project hectares | 100% | 14.6% | 25.3% | 27.8% | 0.9% | 31.4% | |
Credits | Mean | 1,564,321 | 710,158 | 1,960,166 | 4,812,063 | 508,416 | 697,579 |
Min | 777 | 4343 | 52,124 | 362,722 | 137,902 | 777 | |
Max | 16,085,960 | 2,098,896 | 6,249,083 | 16,085,960 | 1,182,019 | 3,586,399 | |
Sum | 140,788,878 | 14,913,326 | 33,322,816 | 67,368,886 | 3,558,911 | 21,624,939 | |
Percent of total | 100% | 10.6% | 23.7% | 47.9% | 2.5% | 15.4% | |
Baseline percent of Common Practicea | Mean | 127% | 128.9% | 115.5% | 139.5% | 145% | 123.2% |
Mean weighted by credits | 130% | 136.6% | 112.6% | 143.7% | 127.8% | 113.4% | |
Mean weighted by hectares | 113% | 113% | 112% | 120.7% | 119.2% | 108% | |
Min | 63.1% | 64.8% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 63.1% | |
Max | 256% | 255.2% | 163.2% | 241.7% | 256.1% | 242.4% | |
