Table 2 Description of the risk dimensions and how they were calculated and normalized in this study

From: Riverine communities in the Central Amazon are largely subject to erosion and sedimentation risk

Dimensions

Variable /Indicator

Maximum value in all communities

Normalization

Hazard

Increasing open water trends (erosion) Decreasing open water trends (sedimentation)

48.05 73.22

Increasing trends (erosion) / maximum values Decreasing trends (sedimentation) / maximum values

Exposure

Total number of people

649

Total number of people / maximum values

Vulnerability

Distance to Tefé’s urban area (km)

384

Distance to Tefé’s urban area / maximum values

Distance to the nearest urban center (km)

124

Distance to the nearest urban center / maximum values

Total number of community migrations due to either erosion or sedimentation

does not apply

Values were defined as 1 = no migration, 0.8 = 1 migration, 0.6 = 2 migrations, 0.4 = 3 migrations and 0.2 = 4 migrations. Considering that the highest values correspond to the most vulnerable locations, due to the lack of experience in dealing with changes.

Number of women

305

Number of women / maximum values

Number of children

254

Number of children / maximum values

Number of elderly people

29

Number of elderly / maximum values

Education index

Does not apply

2/3 (community people between 10–14 years that can read) + 1/3 (community people over 15 years old that can read).

Economic Development index

Does not apply

Average number of equipments per house in a community / Maximum value in all communities

Social Organization index

Does not apply

With Community Association = 0.25 + With community center = 0.25 + With school = 0.25 + With health agent = 0.25

Social Development Index (SDI) based on three dimensions: education, economic development and social organization

does not apply

SDI = (Education Index + Economic Development index + Social Organization index) / 3The final value for risk computation is considered as (1 - SDI), to make communities with lower SDI values to have higher vulnerability

Total Vulnerability

Average of the values of the normalized variables mentioned above: Distance to Tefé’s urban area, Distance to the nearest urban center, Number of migrations, Number of women, children, elderly and Social Development Index

does not apply

does not apply

Risk calculation

Multiplication of the variables hazard, exposure and total vulnerability

does not apply

does not apply