Fig. 5: Rh/Rs values and their trends across different ecosystem types. | Communications Earth & Environment

Fig. 5: Rh/Rs values and their trends across different ecosystem types.

From: Various responses of global heterotrophic respiration to variations in soil moisture and temperature enhance the positive feedback on atmospheric warming

Fig. 5

a Comparison of Rh/Rs value differences across various ecosystem types; (b) Comparison of Rh/Rs trend differences across various ecosystem types. Error bars represent 5.16 times the standard error (±5.16SE). The different letters indicate significant differences among the different ecosystem type (P < 0.05). Given the substantial sample size, conventional confidence multipliers were referenced: 1.96 × SE for 95% confidence level and 2.58 × SE for 99% confidence level. To achieve ultra-conservative statistical assurance, a 5.16 × SE threshold was implemented, corresponding to a 99.9% confidence level.

Back to article page