Table 1 Chemical analysis resultsa (wt%) and parameters used for melt viscosity parameterization using the MYEGA equation (Eq. 5)

From: Nanoscale chemical heterogeneities control the viscosity of andesitic magmas

 

AND100

AND100red

AND100ox

AND65

AND0

SiO2

60.38 (0.36)

60.47 (0.40)

60.56 (0.35)

62.52 (0.19)

65.91 (0.34)

TiO2

0.79 (0.04)

0.80 (0.07)

0.81 (0.06)

0.56 (0.04)

0.04 (0.03)

Al2O3

16.69 (0.18)

16.83 (0.22)

16.79 (0.19)

17.28 (0.22)

18.01 (0.11)

FeOtot

6.77 (0.12)

6.87 (0.12)

6.76 (0.15)

4.40 (0.11)

0.04 (0.03)

MnO

0.17 (0.03)

0.18 (0.04)

0.18 (0.03)

0.11 (0.03)

0.01 (0.01)

MgO

3.00 (0.07)

2.94 (0.06)

2.95 (0.06)

3.02 (0.07)

3.21 (0.06)

CaO

6.62 (0.09)

6.51 (0.11)

6.49 (0.11)

6.76 (0.13)

7.26 (0.11)

Na2O

3.50 (0.15)

3.46 (0.10)

3.40 (0.10)

3.49 (0.11)

3.82 (0.14)

K2O

1.58 (0.07)

1.65 (0.07)

1.66 (0.06)

1.70 (0.05)

1.75 (0.06)

P2O5

0.18 (0.05)

0.18 (0.05)

0.18 (0.05)

0.16 (0.05)

0.04 (0.03)

Fe3+/Fetotb

0.64 (0.03)

0.27 (0.03)

0.71 (0.03)

0.74 (0.03)

NBO/Tc

0.34

0.31

0.34

0.27

0.16

K/Gd

1.57 (0.02)

1.57 (0.02)

1.58 (0.02)

1.53 (0.02)

1.48 (0.02)

Tge (°C)

654 (1)

645 (1)

662 (1)

696 (1)

737 (1)

mf

30.5 (1)

30.5 (1)

30.5 (1)

31 (0.6)

31.8 (0.2)

  1. aElectron microprobe average chemical composition (n = 10). Parentheses represent ±1σ.
  2. bFrom Mössbauer spectroscopy. Ratios were derived using MossA software95. Numbers in parentheses represent ±1σ.
  3. cNBO/T calculated after Prata et al.107.
  4. dFrom Brillouin spectroscopy. Numbers in parentheses represent ±1σ.
  5. eFrom C-DSC. Numbers in parentheses represent the experimental error.
  6. fFitted fragility using the Mauro–Yue–Ellison–Gupta–Allan (MYEGA) parametrization. Numbers in parentheses represent ±1σ.