Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Clinically relevant acute subjective effects of psychedelics beyond mystical experience

Abstract

The administration of classic psychedelics has been associated with well-being and mental health benefits as well as risks and adverse events. The acute subjective effects of psychedelics might have a causal role in these risks and therapeutic benefits, but inconsistencies and limitations in the conceptualization and measurement of these acute subjective effects hinder research and clinical advances. In this Review, we outline current characterizations and psychometric examinations of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics, evaluate the construct validity of commonly used measures and describe findings showing that specific acute subjective effects predict certain outcomes. We discuss how to balance the limitations of existing measures with methodological advances in practice and elaborate on well-known methods and other psychological processes that can help inform the creation of new measures. We suggest actionable recommendations for how the field can transcend current conceptualizations and provide guidance on best practices until the next generation of measures is validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Possible overlaps between the factors assessed in existing scales of subjective effects of psychedelics.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichols, D. E. Psychedelics. Pharmacol. Rev. 68, 264–355 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yaden, D. B., Mathai, D., Bogenschutz, M. & Nichols, D. in The ASAM Principles of Addiction Medicine 7th edn (eds. Miller, S. C. et al.) 269–292 (Wolters Kluwer, 2024).

  3. Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W. & Griffiths, R. R. Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin. J. Psychopharmacol. 29, 1182–1190 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths, R. R. et al. Psilocybin-occasioned mystical-type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors. J. Psychopharmacol. 32, 49–69 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Studerus, E., Gamma, A. & Vollenweider, F. X. Psychometric evaluation of the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV). PLoS ONE 5, e12412 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Forstmann, M., Yudkin, D. A., Prosser, A. M., Heller, S. M. & Crockett, M. J. Transformative experience and social connectedness mediate the mood-enhancing effects of psychedelic use in naturalistic settings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2338–2346 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, A. K. et al. Survey of entity encounter experiences occasioned by inhaled N,N-dimethyltryptamine: phenomenology, interpretation, and enduring effects. J. Psychopharmacol. 34, 1008–1020 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths, R. R., Hurwitz, E. S., Davis, A. K., Johnson, M. W. & Jesse, R. Survey of subjective “God encounter experiences”: comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT. PLoS ONE 14, e0214377 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S., Johnson, M. W. & Griffiths, R. R. The Challenging Experience Questionnaire: characterization of challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 1279–1295 (2016). This article describes a measure focused on negative valenced acute subjective effects of psychedelics.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, J. et al. Extended difficulties following the use of psychedelic drugs: a mixed methods study. PLoS ONE 18, e0293349 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Carbonaro, T. M. et al. Survey study of challenging experiences after ingesting psilocybin mushrooms: acute and enduring positive and negative consequences. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 1268–1278 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nutt, D., King, L. A., Saulsbury, W. & Blakemore, C. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet 369, 1047–1053 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U. & Jesse, R. Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology 187, 268–283 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths, R. R. et al. Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology 218, 649–665 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2021).

  16. Goldy, S. P. et al. Psychedelic risks and benefits: A cross-sectional survey study. J. Psychopharmacol. (in the press).

  17. Jacobs, E., Yaden, D. B. & Earp, B. D. Toward a broader psychedelic bioethics. AJOB Neurosci. 14, 126–129 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bogenschutz, M. P. et al. Percentage of heavy drinking days following psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy vs placebo in the treatment of adult patients with alcohol use disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 953–962 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carhart-Harris, R. L. et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 3, 619–627 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Daws, R. E. et al. Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression. Nat. Med. 28, 844–851 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis, A. K. et al. Development of the Psychological Insight Questionnaire among a sample of people who have consumed psilocybin or LSD. J. Psychopharmacol. 35, 437–446 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Goodwin, G. M. et al. Single-dose psilocybin for a treatment-resistant episode of major depression. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 1637–1648 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Griffiths, R. R. et al. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized double-blind trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 1181–1197 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grob, C. S. et al. Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 71–78 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Cosimano, M. P. & Griffiths, R. R. Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. J. Psychopharmacol. 28, 983–992 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. von Rotz, R. et al. Single-dose psilocybin-assisted therapy in major depressive disorder: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine 56, 101809 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aday, J. S. et al. Great expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials. Psychopharmacology 239, 1989–2010 (2022). This article discusses expectancy and provides recommendations to improve study design.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yaden, D. B., Yaden, M. E. & Griffiths, R. R. Psychedelics in psychiatry—keeping the renaissance from going off the rails. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 469–470 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Breeksema, J. J. et al. Adverse events in clinical treatments with serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA: a mixed-methods systematic review. J. Psychopharmacol. 36, 1100–1117 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hinkle, J., Graziosi, M., Nayak, S. M. & Yaden, D. B. Adverse events in studies of classic psychedelics. JAMA Psychiatry (in the press).

  31. Yaden, D. B., Potash, J. B. & Griffiths, R. R. Preparing for the bursting of the psychedelic hype bubble. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 943–944 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olson, D. E. The subjective effects of psychedelics may not be necessary for their enduring therapeutic effects. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 563–567 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ly, C. et al. Transient stimulation with psychoplastogens is sufficient to initiate neuronal growth. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 452–460 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yaden, D. B. & Griffiths, R. R. The subjective effects of psychedelics are necessary for their enduring therapeutic effects. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 568–572 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nautiyal, K. M. & Yaden, D. B. Does the trip matter? Investigating the role of the subjective effects of psychedelics in persisting therapeutic effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 48, 215–216 (2023). This work presents a brief perspective on the role of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics in predicting persisting effects and possible avenues of empirical tests.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Messick, S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am. Psychol. 50, 741 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ko, K., Knight, G., Rucker, J. J. & Cleare, A. J. Psychedelics, mystical experience, and therapeutic efficacy: a systematic review. Front. Psychiatry 13, 917199 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ross, S. et al. Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 1165–1180 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liechti, M. E., Dolder, P. C. & Schmid, Y. Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology 234, 1499–1510 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J. & Carhart-Harris, R. L. Quality of acute psychedelic experience predicts therapeutic efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 309463 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weiss, B. et al. Unique psychological mechanisms in the treatment of major depressive disorder underlying psilocybin therapy versus escitalopram treatment. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 22, 806–841 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R. & Johnson, M. W. Psilocybin-occasioned mystical experiences in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Curr. Drug. Abuse Rev. 7, 157–164 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. MacLean, K. A., Leoutsakos, J. M. S., Johnson, M. W. & Griffiths, R. R. Factor analysis of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire: a study of experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin. J. Sci. Study Relig. 51, 721–737 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kangaslampi, S. Association between mystical-type experiences under psychedelics and improvements in well-being or mental health—a comprehensive review of the evidence. J. Psychedelic Stud. 7, 18–28 (2023). This article examines the correlation between acute subjective effects of psychedelics and persisting positive effects.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gukasyan, N. et al. Efficacy and safety of psilocybin-assisted treatment for major depressive disorder: prospective 12-month follow-up. J. Psychopharmacol. 36, 151–158 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ly, C. et al. Psychedelics promote structural and functional neural plasticity. Cell Rep. 23, 3170–3182 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Vollenweider, F. X., Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen, M. F., Bäbler, A., Vogel, H. & Hell, D. Psilocybin induces schizophrenia-like psychosis in humans via a serotonin-2 agonist action. Neuroreport 9, 3897–3902 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. González-Maeso, J. et al. Hallucinogens recruit specific cortical 5-HT2A receptor-mediated signaling pathways to affect behavior. Neuron 53, 439–452 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Madsen, M. K. et al. Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels. Neuropsychopharmacology 44, 1328–1334 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Geyer, M. A. & Vollenweider, F. X. Serotonin research: contributions to understanding psychoses. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 445–453 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vollenweider, F. X. & Preller, K. H. Psychedelic drugs: neurobiology and potential for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 611–624 (2020). This article reviews the neurobiology of psychedelic effects.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Preller, K. H. et al. Changes in global and thalamic brain connectivity in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness are attributable to the 5-HT2A receptor. eLife 7, e35082 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Doss, M. K. et al. Models of psychedelic drug action: modulation of cortical-subcortical circuits. Brain 145, 441–456 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Barrett, F. S., Krimmel, S. R., Griffiths, R. R., Seminowicz, D. A. & Mathur, B. N. Psilocybin acutely alters the functional connectivity of the claustrum with brain networks that support perception, memory, and attention. NeuroImage 218, 116980 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Carhart-Harris, R. L. & Friston, K. J. REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol. Rev. 71, 316–344 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Carhart-Harris, R. L. et al. Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4853–4858 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. McCulloch, D. E. W. et al. Navigating the chaos of psychedelic neuroimaging: a multi-metric evaluation of acute psilocybin effects on brain entropy. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.03.23292164 (2023).

  58. Tiwari, P. et al. Learned helplessness as a potential transdiagnostic therapeutic mechanism of classic psychedelics. Psychedelic Med. 1, 74–86 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hibicke, M., Landry, A. N., Kramer, H. M., Talman, Z. K. & Nichols, C. D. Psychedelics, but not ketamine, produce persistent antidepressant-like effects in a rodent experimental system for the study of depression. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 11, 864–871 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Elk, M. & Yaden, D. B. Pharmacological, neural, and psychological mechanisms underlying psychedelics: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 140, 104793 (2022). This review aims to bridge diverse levels of analysis beyond the psychological level.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pahnke, W. N. Drugs & Mysticism: An Analysis of the Relationship between Psychedelic Drugs and Mystical Consciousness Divinity (Harvard Univ. Press, 1963).

  62. Stace, W. T. Mysticism and Philosophy (MacMillan, 1960).

  63. Taves, A. Mystical and other alterations in sense of self: an expanded framework for studying nonordinary experiences. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 669–690 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dittrich, A. Zusammenstellung eines Fragebogens (APZ) zur Erfassung abnormer psychischer Zustande [Construction of a questionnaire (APZ) for assessing abnormal mental states] [German]. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychiatr. Psychother. 12, 20 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Moreau de Tours, J. Du hachisch et de l’aliénation mentale. Études Psychologiques (Fortin, Masson, 1845).

  66. Dittrich, A. The standardized psychometric assessment of altered states of consciousness (ASCs) in humans. Pharmacopsychiatry 31, 80–84 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bodmer, I., Dittrich, A. & Lamparter, D. Aussergewöhnliche Bewusstseinszustände-Ihre gemeinsame Struktur und Messung [Altered states of consciousness—their common structure and assessment] [German]. Welten des. Bewusstseins 3, 45–58 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dittrich, A., Lamparter, D. & Maurer, M. 5D-ASC: Questionnaire for the Assessment of Altered States of Consciousness. A Short Introduction (PSIN PLUS, 2010).

  69. Strassman, R. J., Qualls, C. R., Uhlenhuth, E. H. & Kellner, R. Dose–response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. II. Subjective effects and preliminary results of a new rating scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51, 98–108 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bouso, J. C., Pedrero‐Pérez, E. J., Gandy, S. & Alcázar‐Córcoles, M. Á. Measuring the subjective: revisiting the psychometric properties of three rating scales that assess the acute effects of hallucinogens. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. 31, 356–372 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Weiss, B., Miller, J., Carter, N. & Campbell, W. Development of the Ayahuasca Experience Inventory (AEI) (Open Science Foundation, 2021).

  72. Weiss, B., Miller, J. D., Carter, N. T. & Keith Campbell, W. Examining changes in personality following shamanic ceremonial use of ayahuasca. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–15 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Taves, A. et al. What counts as religious experience? The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences as a tool for analysis across cultures. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ux28d (2019).

  74. Taves, A. et al. The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): evidence of validity in the United States and India. PLoS ONE 18, e0287780 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Yaden, D. B. et al. The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): a multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. J. Posit. Psychol. 14, 474–488 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wolff, M., Mertens, L. J., Walter, M., Enge, S. & Evens, R. The Acceptance/Avoidance-Promoting Experiences Questionnaire (APEQ): a theory-based approach to psychedelic drugs’ effects on psychological flexibility. J. Psychopharmacol. 36, 387–408 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Watts, R. et al. The Watts Connectedness Scale: a new scale for measuring a sense of connectedness to self, others, and world. Psychopharmacology 239, 3461–3483 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Roseman, L. et al. Emotional breakthrough and psychedelics: validation of the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory. J. Psychopharmacol. 33, 1076–1087 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Nour, M. M., Evans, L., Nutt, D. & Carhart-Harris, R. L. Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the Ego-Dissolution Inventory (EDI). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 269 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Haertzen, C. A. Development of scales based on patterns of drug effects, using the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Psychol. Rep. 18, 163–194 (1966).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Martin, W. R., Sloan, J. W., Sapira, J. D. & Jasinski, D. R. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 12, 245–258 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mason, O. J., Morgan, C. J., Stefanovic, A. & Curran, H. V. The Psychotomimetic States Inventory (PSI): measuring psychotic-type experiences from ketamine and cannabis. Schizophr. Res. 103, 138–142 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. de Deus Pontual, A. A., Senhorini, H. G., Corradi-Webster, C. M., Tófoli, L. F. & Daldegan-Bueno, D. Systematic review of psychometric instruments used in research with psychedelics. J. Psychoact. Drugs 55, 359–368 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J. & Van Heerden, J. The concept of validity. Psychol. Rev. 111, 1061 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281 (1955). This work is a classic text on construct validity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (US). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association, 2014).

  87. Messick, S. Meaning and values in test validation: the science and ethics of assessment. Educ. Res. 18, 5–11 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Carter, O. L. et al. Using psilocybin to investigate the relationship between attention, working memory, and the serotonin 1A and 2A receptors. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1497–1508 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Daumann, J. et al. Pharmacological modulation of the neural basis underlying inhibition of return (IOR) in the human 5-HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis. Psychopharmacology 200, 573–583 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E. et al. Inhibition of return in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 431–441 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Vollenweider, F. X., Csomor, P. A., Knappe, B., Geyer, M. A. & Quednow, B. B. The effects of the preferential 5-HT2A agonist psilocybin on prepulse inhibition of startle in healthy human volunteers depend on interstimulus interval. Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 1876–1887 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Quednow, B. B., Kometer, M., Geyer, M. A. & Vollenweider, F. X. Psilocybin-induced deficits in automatic and controlled inhibition are attenuated by ketanserin in healthy human volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 630–640 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Schmidt, A. et al. Acute LSD effects on response inhibition neural networks. Psychol. Med. 48, 1464–1473 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Barrett, F. S., Carbonaro, T. M., Hurwitz, E., Johnson, M. W. & Griffiths, R. R. Double-blind comparison of the two hallucinogens psilocybin and dextromethorphan: effects on cognition. Psychopharmacology 235, 2915–2927 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Evens, R., Schmidt, M. E., Majić, T. & Schmidt, T. T. The psychedelic afterglow phenomenon: a systematic review of subacute effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 13, 20451253231172254 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Doss, M. K. et al. Unique effects of sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids on episodic memory: a review and reanalysis of acute drug effects on recollection, familiarity, and metamemory. Psychol. Rev. 131, 523–562 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Lennon, R. T. Assumptions underlying the use of content validity. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 16, 294–304 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Fauvel, B., Kangaslampi, S., Strika-Bruneau, L., Roméo, B. & Piolino, P. Validation of a French version of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire with retrospective reports of the most significant psychedelic experience among French users. J. Psychoact. Drugs 55, 170–179 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A. & Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. Discovering the structures of lived experience: towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 18, 691–730 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Scheidegger, M. Microphenomenology and Psychedelics: A Two-fold Approach to Enhancing Psychotherapy and Consciousness Research (Swiss National Science Foundation, 2020).

  101. Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Wirsching, A., Bostoen, T. & Huizink, A. C. A psychometric evaluation of the Dutch Revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire. J. Psychoact. Drugs https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2272832 (2023).

  103. Haijen, E. C. et al. Predicting responses to psychedelics: a prospective study. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 897 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Weiss, B., Sleep, C. E., Beller, N. M., Erritzoe, D. & Campbell, W. K. Perceptions of psychedelic personality change, determinants of use, setting and drug moderation: toward a holistic model. J. Psychedelic Stud. 7, 200–226 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Nayak, S. M., Singh, M., Yaden, D. B. & Griffiths, R. R. Belief changes associated with psychedelic use. J. Psychopharmacol. 37, 80–92 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Nayak, S. M. et al. Psychedelic experiences increase mind perception but do not change atheist-believer status: a prospective longitudinal study. J. Psychoact. Drugs https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2346130 (2024).

  107. Graziosi, M., Singh, M., Nayak, S. M. & Yaden, D. B. Acute subjective effects of psychedelics within and beyond WEIRD contexts. J. Psychoact. Drugs 55, 558–569 (2023). This article provides a qualitative analysis of accounts of psychedelic experiences in non-Western contexts and discusses how they fit into existing measurement categories.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 29–29 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Hartogsohn, I. Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: an extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 1259–1267 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Hyde, R. W. in The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy (ed. Sarwer-Foner, G. J.) 297–315 (Charles C. Thomas, 1960).

  111. Hood, R. W. Construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. J. Sci. Stud. Relig. 14, 29–41 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. DeYoung, C. G. & Krueger, R. F. To wish impossible things: on the ontological status of latent variables and the prospects for theory in psychology. Psychol. Inq. 31, 289–296 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Earleywine, M., Low, F. & De Leo, J. A semantic scale network analysis of the revised Mystical Experiences Questionnaire: a call for collaboration. J. Psychedelic Stud. 5, 156–165 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Maul, A. Rethinking traditional methods of survey validation. Meas-Interdiscip. Res. 15, 51–69 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Dang, J., King, K. M. & Inzlicht, M. Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 267–269 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Padilla García, J. L. & Benítez Baena, I. Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema 26, 136–144 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M. & Zumbo, B. D. Investigating the substantive aspect of construct validity for the Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for children: a focus on cognitive processes. Soc. Indic. Res. 100, 37–60 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Willis G. B. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design (Sage, 2005).

  119. Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L. & Koons, H. H. Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 68, 397–412 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Zumbo, B. D. & Shear, B. R. The Concept of Validity and Some Novel Validation Methods Vol. 56 (Northeastern Educational Research Association, 2011).

  121. Wolf, M. G., Ihm, E., Maul, A. & Taves, A. The response process evaluation method. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rbd2x (2023).

  122. Day, S. J. & Altman, D. G. Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. Brit. Med. J. 321, 504 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Szigeti, B. & Heifets, B. D. Expectancy effects in psychedelic trials. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 512–521 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Fredrickson, B. L. in The Psychology of Gratitude (eds Emmons, R. A. & McCullough, M. E.) 145–166 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).

  125. Goldy, S. P., Hendricks, P. S., Keltner, D., Yaden, D. B. Considering distinct positive emotions in psychedelic science. Int. Rev. Psychiatry (in the press).

  126. Hendricks, P. S. Awe: a putative mechanism underlying the effects of classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 30, 331–342 (2018). This article provides an argument for linking aspects of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics to better-studied emotions, such as awe.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M. & Keltner, D. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108, 883–899 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Keltner, D. & Haidt, J. Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cogn. Emot. 13, 505–521 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Keltner, D. & Haidt, J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn. Emot. 17, 297–314 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Chirico, A. et al. Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe: an experimental study. Sci. Rep. 7, 1218 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Goldy, S. P., Jones, N. M. & Piff, P. K. The social effects of an awesome solar eclipse. Psychol. Sci. 33, 1452–1462 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Goldy, S. P. & Piff, P. K. Toward a social ecology of prosociality: why, when, and where nature enhances social connection. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 32, 27–31 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Graziosi, M. & Yaden, D. Interpersonal awe: exploring the social domain of awe elicitors. J. Posit. Psychol. 16, 263–271 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Rudd, M., Hildebrand, C. & Vohs, K. D. Inspired to create: awe enhances openness to learning and the desire for experiential creation. J. Mark. Res. 55, 766–781 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Valdesolo, P., Shtulman, A. & Baron, A. S. Science is awe-some: the emotional antecedents of science learning. Emot. Rev. 9, 215–221 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Danvers, A. F. & Shiota, M. N. Going off script: effects of awe on memory for script-typical and -irrelevant narrative detail. Emotion 17, 938–952 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. The need to belong—desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human-motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Hawkley, L. C. & Cacioppo, J. T. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann. Behav. Med. 40, 218–227 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Hood Jr, R. W., Hill, P. C. & Spilka, B. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach (Guilford Publications, 2009).

  140. Yaden, D. B. & Newberg, A. B. The Varieties of Spiritual Experience: 21st Century Research and Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, 2022).

  141. Yaden, D. B., Nayak, S. M. & Griffiths, R. R. in Philosophical Perspectives on Psychedelic Psychiatry (eds. Letheby, C. & Gerrans, P.) (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).

  142. James, W. The Varieties of Religious Experience (Harvard Univ. Press, 1902).

  143. Yaden, D. B., Haidt, J., Hood, R. W., Vago, D. R. & Newberg, A. B. The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 21, 143–160 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Parkinson, C., Liu, S. & Wheatley, T. A common cortical metric for spatial, temporal, and social distance. J. Neurosci. 34, 1979–1987 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Wittmann, M. Felt Time: The Psychology of How We Perceive Time 1–169 (MIT Press, 2016).

  146. Griffiths, R., Richards, W., Johnson, M., McCann, U. & Jesse, R. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. J. Psychopharmacol. 22, 621–632 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Belser, A. B. et al. Patient experiences of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J. Humanist Psychol. 57, 354–388 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Levin, A. W. et al. The therapeutic alliance between study participants and intervention facilitators is associated with acute effects and clinical outcomes in a psilocybin-assisted therapy trial for major depressive disorder. PloS ONE. 19, e0300501 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Köhler, W. The Mentality of Apes (E. Winter, Trans.) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1925).

  150. Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H. Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats. Univ. Calif. Publ. Psychol. 4, 257–275 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J. & Kounios, J. New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 322–328 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Insel, T. R. Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA 318, 1215–1216 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Eichstaedt, J. C. et al. Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11203–11208 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Ferreira, F. & Lowder, M. W. in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (ed. Ross, B. H.) 217–247 (Elsevier Academic, 2016).

  155. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life (Sage, 2007).

  156. Becker, A. M. et al. Ketanserin reverses the acute response to LSD in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy participants. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 26, 97–106 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Timmermann, C. et al. Neural correlates of the DMT experience assessed with multivariate EEG. Sci. Rep. 9, 16324 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Fried, E. I. Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature. Psychol. Inq. 31, 271–288 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. John, O. P., Angleitner, A. & Ostendorf, F. The lexical approach to personality—a historical review of trait taxonomic research. Eur. J. Pers. 2, 171–203 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Reisenzein, R., Hildebrandt, A. & Weber, H. in The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology 2nd edn (eds Corr, P. J. & Matthew, G.) 81–100 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  161. McNally, R. J. Network analysis of psychopathology: controversies and challenges. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 17, 31–53 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Borsboom, D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 16, 5–13 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Cramer, A. O. J. et al. Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: you can’t like parties if you don’t like people. Eur. J. Pers. 26, 414–431 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Goldberg, L. R. Doing it all bass-ackwards: the development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. J. Res. Pers. 40, 347–358 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 81–90 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Hoogeveen, S. et al. A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Relig. Brain. Behav. 13, 237–283 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A. & Vanpaemel, W. Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 702–712 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Hardy, A. C. The Spiritual Nature of Man: A Study of Contemporary Religious Experience (Clarendon, 1979).

  169. Sanders, J. W. & Zijlmans, J. Moving past mysticism in psychedelic science. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 1253–1255 (2021). This article calls to abandon the term mystical experience because of its colloquial meaning.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Russell, B. Mysticism and Logic (Doubleday, 1917).

  171. Breeksema, J. J. & van Elk, M. Working with weirdness: a response to “moving past mysticism in psychedelic science”. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 1471–1474 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Mosurinjohn, S., Roseman, L. & Girn, M. Psychedelic-induced mystical experiences: an interdisciplinary discussion and critique. Front. Psychiatry. 14, 1077311 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Peterson, R. A theological reckoning with bad trips. Harvard Divinity Bulletin https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/a-theological-reckoning-with-bad-trips/ (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M. van Elk, S. Nayak, S. Kangaslami, R. Ehrenkranz, P. Tiwari and M. Graziosi for their comments and K. Klein for her assistance. This article is dedicated to the memory of Roland R. Griffiths, who passed away on 16 October 2023 after accepting a terminal cancer diagnosis with inspiring grace and gratitude for life. Roland was a beloved friend, colleague and mentor. He was an exemplar of scientific curiosity across a range of topics in psychopharmacology and beyond. He was among those primarily responsible for the restart of rigorous scientific work on sychedelic substances such as psilocybin, which is now a global field of scientific research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors wrote the article and contributed substantially to the discussion of the content. D.B.Y. and R.R.G. conceived the paper. D.B.Y., S.P.G., B.W. and R.R.G. researched data for the article. D.B.Y., S.P.G., R.R.G. and B.W reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Yaden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Support for D.B.Y., S.P.G., B.W. and R.R.G. through the Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research was provided by Tim Ferriss, Matt Mullenweg, Blake Mycoskie, Craig Nerenberg, and the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation. R.R.G. reported grants from the Riverstyx Foundation, a crowdsourced funding campaign organized by Tim Ferris, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant R01DA03889) for research support outside the submitted work; personal fees from the Heffter Research Institute (HRI) to cover travel costs as a member of the board of directors of HRI outside the submitted work; and was site principal investigator for a multisite trial of psilocybin-facilitated treatment of major depressive disorder sponsored by the Usona Institute. B.W. owns Axial Therapeutic Research, Inc., a company investigating the safety and effectiveness of alternative treatments for military veteran health.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Matthias Forstmann and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaden, D.B., Goldy, S.P., Weiss, B. et al. Clinically relevant acute subjective effects of psychedelics beyond mystical experience. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 606–621 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00345-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00345-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing