Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Revisiting the use of adverse childhood experience screening in healthcare settings

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are key modifiable risk factors for mental illness. The potential to detect and mitigate ACEs to improve population mental health has led to large public health efforts. However, basing public mental health decisions on ACE screening has revealed several conspicuous challenges. In this Review, we provide a critical overview of these challenges, focusing on the validity of ACE screening measures, their accuracy in classifying individuals at risk for poor mental health outcomes, their utility in facilitating the delivery of targeted interventions, their acceptability by respondents and interviewers, and the overall financial sustainability of this screening approach. There are clear research opportunities to address these challenges and improve current practices. For example, basic measurement research could improve the validity and acceptability of ACE measures, individual risk modelling approaches could be adopted to improve the accuracy of ACE screening to predict mental health conditions and guide intervention selection, and promising interventions could be tested to ensure that vulnerable individuals detected through ACE screening receive effective support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: ACEs and modifiers of impact on mental health.
Fig. 2: Problems with intervention delivery based on ACE screening.
Fig. 3: Risk configurations in individuals with high ACE scores.
Fig. 4: Types of preventative interventions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madigan, S. et al. Adverse childhood experiences: a meta-analysis of prevalence and moderators among half a million adults in 206 studies. World Psychiatry 22, 463–471 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, K. et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public. Health 2, e356–e366 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danese, A., McLaughlin, K. A., Samara, M. & Stover, C. S. Psychopathology in children exposed to trauma: detection and intervention needed to reduce downstream burden. BMJ 371, m3073 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert, R. et al. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet 373, 68–81 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, S. J. et al. The epidemiology of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder in a representative cohort of young people in England and Wales. Lancet Psychiatry 6, 247–256 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellis, M. A. et al. Life course health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public. Health 4, e517–e528 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Arango, C. et al. Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence-based atlas. World Psychiatry 20, 417–436 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nanni, V., Uher, R. & Danese, A. Childhood maltreatment predicts unfavorable course of illness and treatment outcome in depression: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 141–151 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, N. J., Hellman, J. L., Scott, B. G., Weems, C. F. & Carrion, V. G. The impact of adverse childhood experiences on an urban pediatric population. Child. Abuse Negl. 35, 408–413 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Asmussen, K., Fischer, F., Drayton, E. & McBride, T. Adverse childhood experiences: what we know, what we don’t know, and what should happen next. Early Intervention Foundation https://www.eif.org.uk/report/adverse-childhood-experiences-what-we-know-what-we-dont-know-and-what-should-happen-next (2020).

  11. Viswanathan, M. et al. Primary care interventions to prevent child maltreatment: evidence report and systematic review for the us preventive services task force. JAMA 331, 959–971 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, P., Dalgleish, T. & Meiser-Stedman, R. Practitioner review: posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment in children and adolescents. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 60, 500–515 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marie-Mitchell, A. & Kostolansky, R. A systematic review of trials to improve child outcomes associated with adverse childhood experiences. Am. J. Prev. Med. 56, 756–764 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenc, T., Lester, S., Sutcliffe, K., Stansfield, C. & Thomas, J. Interventions to support people exposed to adverse childhood experiences: systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Public. Health 20, 657 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart, S. & Holland, W. Screening in Disease Prevention: What Works (Nuffield Trust, 2005).

  16. UK National Screening Committee. Evidence review criteria: national screening programmes. GOV.UK https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evidence-review-criteria-national-screening-programmes (2022).

  17. Finkelhor, D. Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): cautions and suggestions. Child. Abuse Negl. 85, 174–179 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly-Irving, M. & Delpierre, C. A critique of the adverse childhood experiences framework in epidemiology and public health: uses and misuses. Soc. Policy Soc. 18, 445–456 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ford, K. et al. The evidence base for routine enquiry into adverse childhood experiences: a scoping review. Child. Abuse Negl. 91, 131–146 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anda, R. F., Porter, L. E. & Brown, D. W. Inside the adverse childhood experience score: strengths, limitations, and misapplications. Am. J. Prev. Med. 59, 293–295 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gentry, S. V. & Paterson, B. A. Does screening or routine enquiry for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) meet criteria for a screening programme? A rapid evidence summary. J. Public. Health 44, 810–822 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherin, K. M., Stillerman, A. J., Chandrasekar, L., Went, N. S. & Niebuhr, D. W. Recommendations for population-based applications of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study: position statement by the American College of Preventive Medicine. AJPM Focus. 1, 100039 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra, K. et al. Screening for adverse childhood experiences in preventive medicine settings: a scoping review. J. Public. Health 31, 613–622 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirkbride, J. B. et al. The social determinants of mental health and disorder: evidence, prevention and recommendations. World Psychiatry 23, 58–90 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ben-Shlomo, Y. & Kuh, D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 285–293 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J. & Power, C. Life course epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57, 778–783 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Flaherty, E. G. et al. Effect of early childhood adversity on child health. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 160, 1232–1238 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson, D. B., Testa, A. & Vaughn, M. G. Adverse childhood experiences and school readiness among preschool-aged children. J. Pediatr. 230, 191–197.e5 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipscomb, S. T., Hatfield, B., Lewis, H., Goka-Dubose, E. & Abshire, C. Adverse childhood experiences and children’s development in early care and education programs. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 72, 101218 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E. & Halfon, N. Adverse childhood experiences: assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Aff. 33, 2106–2115 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flaherty, E. G. et al. Adverse childhood experiences and child health in early adolescence. JAMA Pediatr. 167, 622–629 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Danese, A. & Baldwin, J. R. Hidden wounds? Inflammatory links between childhood trauma and psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 517–544 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Engel, M. L. & Gunnar, M. R. The development of stress reactivity and regulation during human development. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 150, 41–76 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McLaughlin, K. A., Sheridan, M. A. & Lambert, H. K. Childhood adversity and neural development: deprivation and threat as distinct dimensions of early experience. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 578–591 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A. & Viding, E. Research review: the neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 51, 1079–1095 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell, R., Brennan, K., Curran, D., Hanna, D. & Dyer, K. F. W. A meta-analysis of the association between appraisals of trauma and posttraumatic stress in children and adolescents. J. Trauma. Stress. 30, 88–93 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Danese, A. & McEwen, B. S. Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiol. Behav. 106, 29–39 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., McEwen, B. S. & Neuroscience Molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA 301, 2252–2259 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Felitti, V. J. et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 14, 245–258 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, K. E. & Pollak, S. D. Rethinking concepts and categories for understanding the neurodevelopmental effects of childhood adversity. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 67–93 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cicchetti, D. & Rogosch, F. A. Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Dev. Psychopathol. 8, 597–600 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system ACE data. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/ace-brfss.html (2023).

  43. Swedo, E. A. et al. Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences among U.S. adults—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2011–2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 72, 707–715 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. US Census Bureau. About the National Survey of Children’s Health. US Census Bureau https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/nsch/about.html (2024).

  45. NSCH. The National Survey of Children’s Health. The Child & Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative https://www.childhealthdata.org/learn-about-the-nsch/NSCH (2024).

  46. World Health Organization. Adverse childhood experiences international questionnaire (ACE-IQ). https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/adverse-childhood-experiences-international-questionnaire-(ace-iq) (2024).

  47. Shimkhada, R. et al. Policy considerations for routine screening for adverse childhood events (ACEs). J. Am. Board. Fam. Med. 35, 862–866 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. ACEs Aware. ACE screening implementation: how-to guide. ACEs Aware https://www.acesaware.org/implement-screening/about-the-guide/ (2024).

  49. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04182906 (2021).

  50. Quigg, Z., Wallis, S. & Butler, N. Routine enquiry about adverse childhood experiences: implementation pack pilot evaluation. PHI Public Health Institute https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b0fe34be5274a18f42a8b0a/REACh-implementation-pack-pilot-evaluation-final-report.pdf (2018).

  51. Welsh Government. Review of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) policy: report. GOV.WALES https://www.gov.wales/review-adverse-childhood-experiences-ace-policy-report-html (2021).

  52. Finkelhor, D., Shattuck, A., Turner, H. & Hamby, S. A revised inventory of adverse childhood experiences. Child. Abuse Negl. 48, 13–21 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cronholm, P. F. et al. Adverse childhood experiences: expanding the concept of adversity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 49, 354–361 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McLanahan, S., Tach, L. & Schneider, D. The causal effects of father absence. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39, 399–427 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Jaffee, S. R., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A. & Taylor, A. Life with (or without) father: the benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father’s antisocial behavior. Child. Dev. 74, 109–126 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dunn, E. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Slopen, N., Rosand, J. & Smoller, J. W. Developmental timing of child maltreatment and symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation in young adulthood: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Depress. Anxiety 30, 955–964 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. van, Harmelen et al. Friendships and family support reduce subsequent depressive symptoms in at-risk adolescents. PLoS ONE 11, e0153715 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Baldwin, J. R., Reuben, A., Newbury, J. B. & Danese, A. Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 76, 584–593 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Reuben, A. et al. Lest we forget: comparing retrospective and prospective assessments of adverse childhood experiences in the prediction of adult health. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 57, 1103–1112 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Danese, A. Annual research review: rethinking childhood trauma—new research directions for measurement, study design and analytical strategies. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 236–250 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Danese, A. & Widom, C. S. Objective and subjective experiences of child maltreatment and their relationships with psychopathology. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 811–818 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Danese, A. & Widom, C. S. Associations between objective and subjective experiences of childhood maltreatment and the course of emotional disorders in adulthood. JAMA Psychiatry 80, 1009–1016 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Danese, A. & Widom, C. S. The subjective experience of childhood maltreatment in psychopathology. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 1307–1308 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Baldwin, J. R., Coleman, O., Francis, E. R. & Danese, A. Prospective and retrospective measures of child maltreatment and their association with psychopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 81, 769–781 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Colman, I. et al. Consistency in adult reporting of adverse childhood experiences. Psychol. Med. 46, 543–549 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Naicker, S. N., Norris, S. A., Mabaso, M. & Richter, L. M. An analysis of retrospective and repeat prospective reports of adverse childhood experiences from the South African Birth to Twenty Plus cohort. PLoS ONE 12, e0181522 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. McLennan, J. D. et al. Routine ACEs screening is NOT recommended. Paediatr. Child. Health 24, 272–273 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Baldwin, J. R. et al. Population vs individual prediction of poor health from results of adverse childhood experiences screening. JAMA Pediatr. 175, 385–393 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Meehan, A. J., Baldwin, J. R., Lewis, S. J., MacLeod, J. G. & Danese, A. Poor individual risk classification from adverse childhood experiences screening. Am. J. Prev. Med. 62, 427–432 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Evans, G. W., Li, D. & Whipple, S. S. Cumulative risk and child development. Psychol. Bull. 139, 1342–1396 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Loveday, S. et al. Screening for adverse childhood experiences in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics 149, e2021051884 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Becker-Blease, K. A. & Freyd, J. J. Research participants telling the truth about their lives: the ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. Am. Psychol. 61, 218–226 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jaffe, A. E., DiLillo, D., Hoffman, L., Haikalis, M. & Dykstra, R. E. Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 40, 40–56 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Skar, A.-M. S., Ormhaug, S. M. & Jensen, T. K. Reported levels of upset in youth after routine trauma screening at mental health clinics. JAMA Netw. Open. 2, e194003 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Scott, S. et al. A briefing for commissioners: what survivors of violence and abuse say about mental health services. DMSS Research https://www.dmss.co.uk/pdfs/REVA-Brief-4-Guidance-for-commissioners-FINAL-071015.pdf (2015).

  76. de Boer, K., Arnold, C., Mackelprang, J. L. & Nedeljkovic, M. Barriers and facilitators to treatment seeking and engagement amongst women with complex trauma histories. Health Soc. Care Community 30, e4303–e4310 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nixon, B. & Quinlan, E. Asking the hard questions: psychologists’ discomfort with inquiring about sexual abuse histories. Violence Women 28, 1358–1376 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kennedy, C., Morrissey, J. & Donohue, G. Mental health nurses’ perceived preparedness to work with adults who have child sexual abuse histories. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 28, 384–393 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Quigg, Z., Harrison, R., Butler, N., Bates, R. & Harris, J. Evaluation of a system wide approach to implementing routine enquiry about adversity in childhood (REAChTM) across Nottinghamshire. PHI Public Health Institute https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/-/media/phi-reports/pdf/2023-03-nottinghamshire-reach-service-evaluation.pdf (2022).

  80. Hardcastle, K. & Bellis, M. A. Health Visitor Enquiry about Caregivers’ Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Key Learning from a Pilot Evaluation (Public Health Wales NHS Trust, 2021).

  81. Alvarado, G. et al. Clinician and staff perspectives on implementing adverse childhood experience (ACE) screening in Los Angeles County pediatric clinics. Ann. Fam. Med. 21, 416–423 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Koball, A. M. et al. The impact of adverse childhood experiences on healthcare utilization in children. Child. Abuse Negl. 111, 104797 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Lewis, K. N., McKelvey, L. M., Zhang, D., Moix, E. & Whiteside-Mansell, L. Risks of adverse childhood experiences on healthcare utilization and outcomes in early childhood. Child. Abuse Negl. 145, 106396 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Okeson, K. et al. Adverse childhood experiences and healthcare utilization of children in pediatric emergency departments. J. Pediatr. 240, 206–212 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Baldwin, J. R. et al. Childhood maltreatment and mental health problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 117–126 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Bernard, D. L. et al. Making the “C-ACE” for a culturally-informed adverse childhood experiences framework to understand the pervasive mental health impact of racism on black youth. J. Child. Adolesc. Trauma. 14, 233–247 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rose, D., Evans, J., Sweeney, A. & Wykes, T. A model for developing outcome measures from the perspectives of mental health service users. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 23, 41–46 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Fritz, J., de Graaff, A. M., Caisley, H., van Harmelen, A.-L. & Wilkinson, P. O. A systematic review of amenable resilience factors that moderate and/or mediate the relationship between childhood adversity and mental health in young people. Front. Psychiatry 9, 230 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bethell, C., Jones, J., Gombojav, N., Linkenbach, J. & Sege, R. Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample. JAMA Pediatr. 173, e193007 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Abi-Dargham, A. et al. Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field. World Psychiatry 22, 236–262 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Gobin, M. et al. Outcomes of mental health screening for United Kingdom nationals affected by the 2015–2016 terrorist attacks in Tunisia, Paris, and Brussels. J. Trauma. Stress. 31, 471–479 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Syed, S. et al. Identifying adverse childhood experiences with electronic health records of linked mothers and children in England: a multistage development and validation study. Lancet Digit. Health 4, e482–e496 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Syed, S. et al. Family adversity and health characteristics associated with intimate partner violence in children and parents presenting to health care: a population-based birth cohort study in England. Lancet Public. Health 8, e520–e534 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Meehan, A. J. et al. Clinical prediction models in psychiatry: a systematic review of two decades of progress and challenges. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 2700–2708 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Meyer-Lindenberg, A. The non-ergodic nature of mental health and psychiatric disorders: implications for biomarker and diagnostic research. World Psychiatry 22, 272–274 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Chekroud, A. M. et al. Illusory generalizability of clinical prediction models. Science 383, 164–167 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Winter, N. R. et al. A systematic evaluation of machine learning-based biomarkers for major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5083 (2024).

  98. Steyerberg, E. W. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating (Springer International, 2019).

  99. Fusar-Poli, P., Hijazi, Z., Stahl, D. & Steyerberg, E. W. The science of prognosis in psychiatry: a review. JAMA Psychiatry 75, 1289–1297 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Moons, K. G. M. et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 170, W1–W33 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Wolff, R. F. et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 170, 51–58 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Fusar-Poli, P. et al. Clinical-learning versus machine-learning for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis onset in individuals at-risk. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 259 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Lacey, R. E. & Minnis, H. Practitioner review: twenty years of research with adverse childhood experience scores—advantages, disadvantages and applications to practice. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 116–130 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Waring, J., Lindvall, C. & Umeton, R. Automated machine learning: review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare. Artif. Intell. Med. 104, 101822 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Christodoulou, E. et al. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 110, 12–22 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Joyce, D. W., Kormilitzin, A., Smith, K. A. & Cipriani, A. Explainable artificial intelligence for mental health through transparency and interpretability for understandability. Npj Digit. Med. 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00751-9 (2023).

  107. Qiu, W., Chen, H., Kaeberlein, M. & Lee, S.-I. ExplaiNAble BioLogical Age (ENABL Age): an artificial intelligence framework for interpretable biological age. Lancet Healthy Longev. 4, e711–e723 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Lee, T. C., Shah, N. U., Haack, A. & Baxter, S. L. Clinical implementation of predictive models embedded within electronic health record systems: a systematic review. Informatics 7, 25 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Coley, R. Y., Johnson, E., Simon, G. E., Cruz, M. & Shortreed, S. M. Racial/ethnic disparities in the performance of prediction models for death by suicide after mental health visits. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 726–734 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. ACE-Aware Scotland. Increasing awareness of Adverse Childhood Experiences. ACE Aware Scotland https://aceawarescotland.com/ (2024).

  111. Sweeney, A., Clement, S., Filson, B. & Kennedy, A. Trauma-informed mental healthcare in the UK: what is it and how can we further its development? Ment. Health Rev. J. 21, 174–192 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D. & Schellinger, K. B. The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child. Dev. 82, 405–432 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Costello, E. J., Compton, S. N., Keeler, G. & Angold, A. Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment. JAMA 290, 2023–2029 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Selph, S. S., Bougatsos, C., Blazina, I. & Nelson, H. D. Behavioral interventions and counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect: a systematic review to update the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 179–190 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L. & Day, J. J. The Triple P-positive parenting program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34, 337–357 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Lundahl, B. W., Nimer, J. & Parsons, B. Preventing child abuse: a meta-analysis of parent training programs. Res. Soc. Work. Pract. 16, 251–262 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Olds, D. L. et al. Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA 278, 637–643 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Peacock, S., Konrad, S., Watson, E., Nickel, D. & Muhajarine, N. Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Public. Health 13, 17 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Dubowitz, H., Feigelman, S., Lane, W. & Kim, J. Pediatric primary care to help prevent child maltreatment: the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) model. Pediatrics 123, 858–864 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Berkowitz, S. J., Stover, C. S. & Marans, S. R. The Child and Family Traumatic Stress Intervention: secondary prevention for youth at risk of developing PTSD. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 52, 676–685 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Stover, C. S., Hahn, H., Maciejewski, K. R., Epstein, C. & Marans, S. The Child and Family Traumatic Stress Intervention: factors associated with symptom reduction for children receiving treatment. Child. Abuse Negl. 134, 105886 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Cohen, J. A., Deblinger, E., Mannarino, A. P. & Steer, R. A. A multisite, randomized controlled trial for children with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 43, 393–402 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Bennett, R. S., Denne, M., McGuire, R. & Hiller, R. M. A systematic review of controlled-trials for PTSD in maltreated children and adolescents. Child. Maltreat 26, 325–343 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Hoppen, T. H., Meiser-Stedman, R., Jensen, T. K., Birkeland, M. S. & Morina, N. Efficacy of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents exposed to single versus multiple traumas: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br. J. Psychiatry 222, 196–203 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Cuijpers, P. et al. The effects of psychological treatments of depression in children and adolescents on response, reliable change, and deterioration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 32, 177–192 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. James, A. C., Reardon, T., Soler, A., James, G. & Creswell, C. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, CD013162 (2020).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Meehan, A. J. et al. Developing an individualized risk calculator for psychopathology among young people victimized during childhood: a population-representative cohort study. J. Affect. Disord. 262, 90–98 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Bisson, J. I. et al. Preventing the onset of post traumatic stress disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 86, 102004 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Weissman, M. M. et al. Remissions in maternal depression and child psychopathology: a STAR*D-child report. JAMA 295, 1389–1398 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Fischer, L. E. On my work: trauma-focused movement language. Lancet Psychiatry 6, 991–993 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. King, C. & Gillard, S. Bringing together coproduction and community participatory research approaches: using first person reflective narrative to explore coproduction and community involvement in mental health research. Health Expect. 22, 701–708 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Smith, G. D. & Kuh, D. Commentary: William Ogilvy Kermack and the childhood origins of adult health and disease. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 696–703 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Rutter, M. in Primary Prevention of Psychopathology Vol. 3 (eds Kent, M. W & Rolf, J. E) 49–74 (Univ. Press of New England, 1979).

  134. Rutter, M. Stress, coping and development: some issues and some questions. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 22, 323–356 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Sameroff, A. J. Environmental risk factors in infancy. Pediatrics 102, 1287–1292 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Barocas, R., Zax, M. & Greenspan, S. Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics 79, 343–350 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.D. received funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London (NIHR203318). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Danese.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Ruth Gilbert and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danese, A., Asmussen, K., MacLeod, J. et al. Revisiting the use of adverse childhood experience screening in healthcare settings. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 729–740 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00362-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00362-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing