Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The benefits and potential costs of cognitive offloading for retrospective information

Abstract

Remembering past information (such as recalling the items needed for a favourite recipe while at the grocery store) can sometimes be difficult. To support such retrospective memory-based tasks in everyday life, people engage in cognitive offloading, defined as the use of physical action (such as writing a shopping list) to reduce internal memory demand. In this Review, we summarize the literature on cognitive offloading for retrospective memory-based tasks. Although laboratory studies have demonstrated that cognitive offloading has benefits for task performance, it is not without costs. For example, unexpectedly losing access to offloaded notes results in poorer performance than relying on internal memory alone. We also consider factors that might lead to variability in the use and benefits of cognitive offloading, such as working memory capacity and age. Indeed, given that older adults exhibit poorer performance in some aspects of retrospective memory than young adults, this group might especially benefit from cognitive offloading in everyday life. Future research should focus on better understanding how, for whom, and under what conditions offloading improves performance to provide maximal benefits while also minimizing the costs associated with cognitive offloading in real-world settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Laboratory-based retrospective memory offloading paradigms.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field (SAGE, 2007).

  2. Risko, E. F. & Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading. Trends Cognit. Sci. 20, 676–688 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobbs, A. R. & Rule, B. G. Prospective memory and self-reports of memory abilities in older adults. Can. J. Psychol. 41, 209–222 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouazzaoui, B. et al. Aging and self-reported internal and external memory strategy uses: the role of executive functioning. Acta Psychol. 135, 59–66 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lovelace, E. A. & Twohig, P. T. Healthy older adults’ perceptions of their memory functioning and use of mnemonics. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 115–118 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wegner, D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cogn. 13, 319–339 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K. & Keil, F. C. Searching for explanations: how the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 674–687 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi, H.-Y., Kensinger, E. A. & Rajaram, S. Mnemonic transmission, social contagion, and emergence of collective memory: influence of emotional valence, group structure, and information distribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 146, 1247–1265 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Congleton, A. R. & Rajaram, S. Collaboration changes both the content and the structure of memory: building the architecture of shared representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 1570–1584 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajaram, S. & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. Collaborative memory: cognitive research and theory. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 649–663 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greeley, G. D., Peña, T. & Rajaram, S. Social remembering in the digital age: implications for virtual study, work, and social engagement. Mem. Mind Media 1, e13 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh, E. J. & Rajaram, S. The digital expansion of the mind: implications of Internet usage for memory and cognition. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 8, 1–14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison, A. B. & Richmond, L. L. Offloading items from memory: individual differences in cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 5, 1 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Offloading memory: serial position effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26, 1347–1353 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Risko, E. F. & Dunn, T. L. Storing information in-the-world: metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Conscious. Cogn. 36, 61–74 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyerhoff, H. S., Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Gilbert, S. J. Individual differences in cognitive offloading: a comparison of intention offloading, pattern copy, and short-term memory capacity. Cogn. Res. 6, 34 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fellers, C. & Storm, B. C. The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4 (2024).

  18. Berry, E. D. J., Allen, R. J., Mon-Williams, M. & Waterman, A. H. Cognitive offloading: structuring the environment to improve children’s working memory task performance. Cogn. Sci. 43, e12770 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bulley, A., McCarthy, T., Gilbert, S. J., Suddendorf, T. & Redshaw, J. Children devise and selectively use tools to offload cognition. Curr. Biol. 30, 3457–3464.e3 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Redshaw, J., Vandersee, J., Bulley, A. & Gilbert, S. J. Development of children’s use of external reminders for hard-to-remember intentions. Child. Dev. 89, 2099–2108 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armitage, K. L., Bulley, A. & Redshaw, J. Developmental origins of cognitive offloading. Proc. R. Soc. B. 287, 20192927 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Just write it down: similarity in the benefit from cognitive offloading in young and older adults. Mem. Cogn. 51, 1580–1592 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Age-related advantage for recall of complex naturalistic information following cognitive offloading. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 38, e4217 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald, J. M. Younger and older jurors: the influence of environmental supports on memory performance and decision making in complex trials. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 55, P323–P331 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morrow, D. G. et al. Environmental support promotes expertise-based mitigation of age differences on pilot communication tasks. Psychol. Aging 18, 268–284 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scarampi, C. & Gilbert, S. J. Age differences in strategic reminder setting and the compensatory role of metacognition. Psychol. Aging 36, 172–185 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schryer, E. & Ross, M. The use and benefits of external memory aids in older and younger adults. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 27, 663–671 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor, R. G., Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. How does source impact memory for complex health-related information and cognitive offloading choice behavior?: Age comparisons for recall and recognition performance. 65th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2024_meeting/abstract_book/2024_abstracts_final.pdf (2024).

  29. Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. Consequences of cognitive offloading: boosting performance but diminishing memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 74, 1477–1496 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boldt, A. & Gilbert, S. J. Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 4, 45 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilbert, S. J. et al. Optimal use of reminders: metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149, 501–517 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ball, B. H., Peper, P., Alakbarova, D., Brewer, G. & Gilbert, S. J. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict benefits to memory from intention offloading. Memory 30, 77–91 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sachdeva, C. & Gilbert, S. J. Excessive use of reminders: metacognition and effort-minimisation in cognitive offloading. Conscious. Cogn. 85, 103024 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsai, P., Sachdeva, C., Gilbert, S. J. & Scarampi, C. An investigation of the saving‐enhanced memory effect: the role of test order and list saving. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 736–748 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Landsiedel, J. & Gilbert, S. J. Creating external reminders for delayed intentions: dissociable influence on “task-positive” and “task-negative” brain networks. NeuroImage 104, 231–240 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O. & Duchek, J. M. in Oxford Handbook of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M.) 395–410 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).

  37. Richmond, L. L. & Burnett, L. K. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (eds Federmeier, K. D. & Payne, B. R.) vol. 77, 193–232 (Academic, 2022).

  38. Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. Organization of Memory 423 (Academic, 1972).

  39. Glisky, E. L., Woolverton, C. B., McVeigh, K. S. & Grilli, M. D. Episodic memory and executive function are differentially affected by retests but similarly affected by age in a longitudinal study of normally-aging older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 863942 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liampas, I. et al. Longitudinal episodic memory trajectories in older adults with normal cognition. Clin. Neuropsychol. 37, 304–321 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U. & Bäckman, L. Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 292–305 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kempe, M., Kalicinski, M. & Memmert, D. Naturalistic assessment of everyday memory performance among older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 41, 426–445 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wank, A. A. et al. Eavesdropping on autobiographical memory: a naturalistic observation study of older adults’ memory sharing in daily conversations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 238 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Schnitzspahn, K. M., Ihle, A., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G. & Kliegel, M. The age-prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms. Int. Psychogeriatr. 23, 583–592 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Risko, E. F. & Kelly, M. O. Offloading memory: a review. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (Elsevier, 2024).

  46. Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C. & Tsai, P.-C. Outsourcing memory to external tools: a review of ‘intention offloading’. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 60–76 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Radnan, M. J., Nicholson, R., Brookman, R. & Harris, C. B. Memory compensation strategies in everyday life: similarities and differences between younger and older adults. Sci. Rep. 13, 8404 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Finley, J. R., Naaz, F. & Goh, F. W. Memory and Technology (Springer International, 2018).

  49. Richmond, L. L., Morrison, A. B., Chein, J. M. & Olson, I. R. Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychol. Aging 26, 813–822 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brehmer, Y., Westerberg, H. & Backman, L. Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 63 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Buschkuehl, M. et al. Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychol. Aging 23, 743–753 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. von Bastian, C. C., Langer, N., Jäncke, L. & Oberauer, K. Effects of working memory training in young and old adults. Mem. Cogn. 41, 611–624 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Turley-Ames, K. Strategy training and working memory task performance. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 446–468 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bailey, H. R., Dunlosky, J. & Hertzog, C. Does strategy training reduce age-related deficits in working memory? Gerontology 60, 346–356 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hudes, R., Rich, J. B., Troyer, A. K., Yusupov, I. & Vandermorris, S. The impact of memory-strategy training interventions on participant-reported outcomes in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 34, 587 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Melby-Lervag, M. & Hulme, C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev. Psychol. 49, 270–291 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Redick, T. S. et al. No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 359–379 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moody, D. Can intelligence be increased by training on a task of working memory? Intelligence 37, 327–328 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sprenger, A. M. et al. Training working memory: limits of transfer. Intelligence 41, 638–663 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Thompson, T. W. et al. Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence. PLoS ONE 8, e63614 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Risko, E. F., Kelly, M. O., Patel, P. & Gaspar, C. Offloading memory leaves us vulnerable to memory manipulation. Cognition 191, 103954 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Murphy, D. H. Strategic offloading: how the value of to‐be‐remembered information influences offloading decision‐making. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 4051 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Brown, M. Enhancing Short-Term Memory Storage through Cognitive Offloading (California State Univ., Sacramento, 2021).

  64. Hu, X., Luo, L. & Fleming, S. M. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading. Cognition 193, 104012 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Beliefs about access to offloaded information at test impacts depth of encoding. 64th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society httpacdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2023_meeting/PS2023_Abstract_Book_Final_1.pdf (2023).

  66. Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. The isolation effect when offloading memory. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cognit. 8, 471–480 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Revisiting the influence of offloading memory on free recall. Mem. Cogn. 50, 710–721 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Study effort and the memory cost of external store availability. Cognition 228, 105228 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. Mutual interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task performance. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 2250–2261 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Richmond, L. L., Kearley, J., Schwartz, S. T. & Hargis, M. B. Take a load off: examining partial and complete cognitive offloading of medication information. Cogn. Res. 8, 12 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Storm, B. C. & Stone, S. M. Saving-enhanced memory: the benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychol. Sci. 26, 182–188 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Runge, Y., Frings, C. & Tempel, T. Specifying the mechanisms behind benefits of saving-enhanced memory. Psychol. Res. 85, 1633–1644 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Runge, Y., Frings, C. & Tempel, T. Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. Memory 27, 1462–1467 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Castel, A. D. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (eds Benjamin, A. S. & Ross, B. H.) Vol. 48, 225–270 (Elsevier, 2007).

  75. Murphy, D. H. & Castel, A. D. Responsible remembering and forgetting in younger and older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 48, 455–473 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Age differences in the use and benefit of partial offloading for recall of valuable information. 65th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2024_meeting/abstract_book/2024_abstracts_final.pdf (2024).

  77. Roediger, H. L. Recall as a self-limiting process. Mem. Cognit. 6, 54–63 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Smith, A. D. Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10, 400–408 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Smith, A. D., D’Agostino, P. R. & Reid, L. S. Output interference in long-term memory. Can. J. Psychol. 24, 85–89 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bäuml, K.-H. & Aslan, A. Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition. Mem. Cognit. 32, 610–617 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Slamecka, N. J. An examination of trace storage in free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 504–513 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pepe, N. W., Moyer, A., Peña, T. & Rajaram, S. Deceitful hints: a meta-analytic review of the part-list cuing impairment in recall. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 1243–1272 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Basden, D. R. & Basden, B. H. Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 1656–1669 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Richmond, L. L. et al. Individual differences in prospective and retrospective memory offloading. J. Mem. Lang. 142, 104617 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Lu, X., Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Offloading information to an external store increases false recall. Cognition 205, 104428 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Epstein, W. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (ed. Bower, G. H.) vol. 6, 147–191 (Elsevier, 1972).

  87. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R. & Gargano, G. J. Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: a comparison of methods. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19, 603–616 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G. & Hasher, L. Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22, 143–156 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Knowlton, B. J. & Castel, A. D. Memory and reward-based learning: a value-directed remembering perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73, 25–52 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Pereira, A. E., Kelly, M. O., Lu, X. & Risko, E. F. On our susceptibility to external memory store manipulation: examining the influence of perceived reliability and expected access to an external store. Memory 30, 412–428 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Deese, J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 17–22 (1959).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 803–814 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Salthouse, T., Atkinson, T. & Berish, D. Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 566–594 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Cowan, N. The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 1158–1170 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R., Schrock, J. & Engle, R. An automated version of the operation span task. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 498–505 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. West, R. L. & Thorn, R. M. Goal-setting, self-efficacy, and memory performance in older and younger adults. Exp. Aging Res. 27, 41–65 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Murphy, D. H. & Castel, A. D. Age-related differences in memory when offloading important information. Psychol. Aging 38, 415–427 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139, 665–682 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kuhns, J. M. & Touron, D. R. Schematic support increases memory strategy use in young and older adults. Psychol. Aging 35, 397–410 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading is value-based decision making: modelling cognitive effort and the expected value of memory. Cognition 247, 105783 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. A meta-analytic review of the benefit of using cognitive offloading to perform memory-based tasks. Cognitive Offloading Meeting 2021 https://cognitiveoffloading.net/conference2021/programme.pdf (2021).

  102. Armitage, K. L. & Redshaw, J. Children boost their cognitive performance with a novel offloading technique. Child. Dev. 93, 25–38 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Park, J. S., Kelly, M. O., Hargis, M. B. & Risko, E. F. The effect of external store reliance on actual and predicted value-directed remembering. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 29, 1367–1376 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Risko, E. F., Kelly, M. O., Lu, X. & Pereira, A. E. in The Remaking of Memory in the Age of the Internet and Social Media (eds Wang, Q. & Hoskins, A.) ch. 5 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2024).

  105. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1170–1187 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Old, S. R. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 23, 104–118 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Hara, Y. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. The role of reduced working memory storage and processing resources in the associative memory deficit of older adults: simulation studies with younger adults. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 22, 129–154 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Spencer, W. D. & Raz, N. Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 10, 527–539 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R. & Davidson, P. S. Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27, 1131–1146 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K. & De Leonardis, D. M. Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 251–268 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Schacter, D. L., Osowiecki, D., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F. & Valdiserri, M. Source memory: extending the boundaries of age-related deficits. Psychol. Aging 9, 81 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Guynn, M. J. Offloading the components of a prospective memory task. In 61st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 84 (Psychonomic Society, 2020).

  113. Guynn, M. J., Mcdaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory: when reminders fail. Mem. Cogn. 26, 287–298 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Ball, B. H., Wiemers, E. A. & Brewer, G. A. Individual differences in memory and attention processes in prospective remembering. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 29, 922–933 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Craik, F. I. M. On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. B, Biol. Sci. 302, 341–359 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Craik, F. I. M. Reducing age-related memory deficits: the roles of environmental support and self-initiated processing activities. Exp. Aging Res. 48, 401–427 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Coane, J. H. Retrieval practice and elaborative encoding benefit memory in younger and older adults. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2, 95–100 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Craik, F. I. M. in Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities (eds Klix, F. & Hagendorf, H.) 409–422 (Elsevier, 1986).

  119. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M. & Ben-Shaul, L. Age-related differences in cued recall: effects of support at encoding and retrieval. Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn. 9, 276–287 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Mair, A., Poirier, M. & Conway, M. A. Supporting older and younger adults’ memory for recent everyday events: a prospective sampling study using SenseCam. Conscious. Cogn. 49, 190–202 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Mair, A., Poirier, M. & Conway, M. A. Memory for staged events: supporting older and younger adults’ memory with SenseCam. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 72, 717–728 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Finley, J. R., Brewer, W. F. & Benjamin, A. S. The effects of end-of-day picture review and a sensor-based picture capture procedure on autobiographical memory using SenseCam. Memory 19, 796–807 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Finley, J. R. & Brewer, W. F. Accuracy and completeness of autobiographical memory: evidence from a wearable camera study. Memory 32, 1012–1042 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Rhodes, S., Greene, N. R. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26, 1529–1547 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Gilbert, S. J. Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68, 971–992 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Review is based, in part, on data presented during the 2023 J. Don Read Early Career Research Award keynote address presented at the 2023 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (SARMAC) conference in Nagoya, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren L. Richmond.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Kristy Armitage, Sandra Grinschgl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richmond, L.L., Taylor, R.G. The benefits and potential costs of cognitive offloading for retrospective information. Nat Rev Psychol 4, 312–321 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00432-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00432-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing