Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

It is time to abandon student evaluations of teaching

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 4, pages 433–434 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

Student teaching evaluations are discriminatory against women and racialized groups, exhibit poor construct and predictive validity, and undermine teaching and learning standards. It is time to replace them with unbiased, empirically driven tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Heffernan, T. Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 47, 144–154 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clayson, D. E. A Comprehensive Critique of Student Evaluation of Teaching: Critical Perspectives on Validity, Reliability, and Impartiality (Routledge, 2021).

  3. Mengel, F., Sauermann, J. & Zölitz, U. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 17, 535–566 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bavishi, A., Madera, J. M. & Hebl, M. R. The effect of professor ethnicity and gender on student evaluations: judged before met. J. Divers. High. Educ. 3, 245–256 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uttl, B., White, C. A. & Gonzalez, D. W. Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: atudent evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Stud. Educ. Eval. 54, 22–42 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uttl, B. Student evaluation of teaching (SET): why the emperor has no clothes and what we should do about it. Human Arenas 7, 403–437 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K. & Gentile, B. Generational increases in agentic self-evaluations among American college students, 1966–2009. Self. Ident. 11, 409–427 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stroebe, W. Why good teaching evaluations may reward bad teaching: on grade inflation and other unintended consequences of student evaluations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 800–816 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galbraith, C. S., Merrill, G. B. & Kline, D. M. Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student learning outcomes in business related classes? A neural network and Bayesian analyses. Res. High. Educ. 53, 353–374 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn, D. M. Experimental evidence on teachers’ racial bias in student evaluation: the role of grading scales. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 42, 375–392 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    Gordon Hodson

Authors
  1. Gordon Hodson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon Hodson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodson, G. It is time to abandon student evaluations of teaching. Nat Rev Psychol 4, 433–434 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00444-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00444-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing