Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Engineering
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications engineering
  3. articles
  4. article
Safe focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening is driven primarily by transient reorganization of tight junctions
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 February 2026

Safe focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening is driven primarily by transient reorganization of tight junctions

  • Rebecca Lynn Noel1 na1,
  • Tara Kugelman1 na1,
  • Maria Eleni Karakatsani1,
  • Sanjid Shahriar2,
  • Moshe J. Willner1,
  • Daniella A. Jimenez1,
  • Claire Sunha Choi1,
  • Yusuke Nimi1,
  • Robin Ji1,
  • Dritan Agalliu2,3 na2 &
  • …
  • Elisa E. Konofagou1,4,5 na2 

Communications Engineering , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomedical engineering
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) with microbubbles opens the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for targeted drug delivery into the brain. How brain endothelial cells (BECs) respond to low acoustic pressures known to open the BBB transiently, or high pressures that cause brain damage, is incompletely characterized. Here, we apply FUS at low (450 kPa) and high (750 kPa) pressures in mice where BBB tight junctions are labeled with eGFP to characterize their abnormalities. Arteriole and capillary BECs respond to low pressure by a transient BBB tight junction reorganization and opening. In contrast, high pressure induces tight junction obliteration and persistent BBB opening in BECs even after 72 hours, associated with microglial activation. Transcriptomic analyses of BECs show that high pressure upregulates genes related to the stress response and cell junction disassembly, whereas low pressure upregulates intracellular repair genes. Thus, transient reorganization and repair of tight junctions mediate safe BBB opening for therapeutic delivery.

Similar content being viewed by others

A fully iPS-cell-derived 3D model of the human blood–brain barrier for exploring neurovascular disease mechanisms and therapeutic interventions

Article Open access 15 December 2025

Blood–brain barrier opening in a large animal model using closed-loop microbubble cavitation-based feedback control of focused ultrasound sonication

Article Open access 27 September 2022

Safety evaluation of a clinical focused ultrasound system for neuronavigation guided blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates

Article Open access 22 July 2021

Data availability

The raw and analyzed mouse BEC scRNA-seq datasets supporting this manuscript are archived at the NIH GEO repository under accession number GSE253425. The source data files for the Main and Extended Data figures associated with this manuscript can be provided to the readers upon request.

Code availability

No commercial code was used in the manuscript. We can provide the code used in R for the analysis of single cell RNA sequencing data to the readers upon request.

References

  1. Ben-Zvi, A. et al. Mfsd2a is critical for the formation and function of the blood-brain barrier. Nature 509, 507–511 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreone, B. J. et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability is regulated by lipid transport-dependent suppression of caveolae-mediated transcytosis. Neuron 94, 581–594.e5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lutz, S. E. et al. Caveolin1 is required for Th1 cell infiltration, but not tight junction remodeling, at the blood-brain barrier in autoimmune neuroinflammation. Cell Rep. 21, 2104–2117 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liebner, S. et al. Functional morphology of the blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 135, 311–336 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, S., Cottarelli, A. & Agalliu, D. Neuronal and glial regulation of CNS angiogenesis and barriergenesis. Dev. Camb. Engl. 147, dev182279 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meng, Y. et al. Safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier opening, an integrative review of animal and human studies. J. Controlled Release 309, 25–36 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leighton, T. G. The Acoustic Bubble (Academic Press, 1997).

  8. Miller, D. L. Particle gathering and microstreaming near ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. Cit. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1378 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kodama, T. & Tomita, Y. Cavitation bubble behavior and bubble-shock wave interaction near a gelatin surface as a study of in vivo bubble dynamics. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 70, 139–149 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prentice, P., Cuschieri, A., Dholakia, K., Prausnitz, M. & Campbell, P. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat. Phys. 1, 107–110 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qin, S. & Ferrara, K. W. Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents. Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 5065–5088 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N. & Hynynen, K. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 834–840 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vlachos, F., Tung, Y.-S. & Konofagou, E. Permeability dependence study of the focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening at distinct pressures and microbubble diameters using DCE-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 66, 821–830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Samiotaki, G., Vlachos, F., Tung, Y.-S. & Konofagou, E. E. A quantitative pressure and microbubble-size dependence study of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening reversibility in vivo using MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 67, 769–777 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Reilly, M. A., Hough, O. & Hynynen, K. Blood-brain barrier closure time after controlled ultrasound-induced opening is independent of opening volume. J. Ultrasound Med. J. Am. Inst. Ultrasound Med. 36, 475–483 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Samiotaki, G. & Konofagou, E. E. Dependence of the reversibility of focused- ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening on pressure and pulse length in vivo. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 60, 2257–2265 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Reilly, M. A., Waspe, A. C., Ganguly, M. & Hynynen, K. Focused-ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier using closely-timed short pulses: influence of sonication parameters and injection rate. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37, 587–594 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, J. J. et al. Noninvasive and localized blood-brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound can be achieved at short pulse lengths and low pulse repetition frequencies. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. J. Int. Soc. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 31, 725–737 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Choi, J. J. et al. Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice In Vivo. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 145–154 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. McMahon, D. & Hynynen, K. Acute inflammatory response following increased blood-brain barrier permeability induced by focused ultrasound is dependent on microbubble dose. Theranostics 7, 3989–4000 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marquet, F., Tung, Y.-S., Teichert, T., Ferrera, V. P. & Konofagou, E. E. Noninvasive, transient and selective blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates in vivo. PLoS One 6, e22598 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. McDannold, N., Arvanitis, C. D., Vykhodtseva, N. & Livingstone, M. S. Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. Cancer Res. 72, 3652 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mainprize, T. et al. Blood-brain barrier opening in primary brain tumors with non-invasive MR-guided focused ultrasound: a clinical safety and feasibility study. Sci. Rep. 9, 321 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lipsman, N. et al. Blood–brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease using MR-guided focused ultrasound. Nat. Commun. 9, 2336 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Treat, L. H. et al. Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Int. J. Cancer 121, 901–907 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Park, E.-J., Zhang, Y.-Z., Vykhodtseva, N. & McDannold, N. Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain/blood-tumor barrier disruption improves outcomes with trastuzumab in a breast cancer brain metastasis model. J. Controlled Release 163, 277–284 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kinoshita, M., McDannold, N., Jolesz, F. A. & Hynynen, K. Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11719–11723 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jordão, J. F. et al. Antibodies targeted to the brain with image-guided focused ultrasound reduces amyloid-β plaque load in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 5, e10549 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kinoshita, M., McDannold, N., Jolesz, F. A. & Hynynen, K. Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood–brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 340, 1085–1090 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Samiotaki, G., Acosta, C., Wang, S. & Konofagou, E. E. Enhanced delivery and bioactivity of the neurturin neurotrophic factor through focused ultrasound—mediated blood—brain barrier opening in vivo. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 35, 611–622 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baseri, B. et al. Activation of signaling pathways following localized delivery of systemically administered neurotrophic factors across the blood–brain barrier using focused ultrasound and microbubbles. Phys. Med. Biol. 57, N65–N81 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, S., Olumolade, O. O., Sun, T., Samiotaki, G. & Konofagou, E. E. Noninvasive, neuron-specific gene therapy can be facilitated by focused ultrasound and recombinant adeno-associated virus. Gene Ther. 22, 104–110 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thévenot, E. et al. Targeted delivery of self-complementary adeno-associated virus serotype 9 to the brain, using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. Hum. Gene Ther. 23, 1144–1155 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Burgess, A. et al. Targeted delivery of neural stem cells to the brain using MRI-guided focused ultrasound to disrupt the blood-brain barrier. PloS One 6, e27877 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sheikov, N., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., Jolesz, F. & Hynynen, K. Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30, 979–989 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sheikov, N., McDannold, N., Sharma, S. & Hynynen, K. Effect of focused ultrasound applied with an ultrasound contrast agent on the tight junctional integrity of the brain microvascular endothelium. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 1093–1104 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raymond, S. B., Skoch, J., Hynynen, K. & Bacskai, B. J. Multiphoton imaging of ultrasound/optison mediated cerebrovascular effects in vivo. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 27, 393–403 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nhan, T. et al. Drug delivery to the brain by focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier disruption: quantitative evaluation of enhanced permeability of cerebral vasculature using two-photon microscopy. J. Control. Release J. Control. Release Soc. 172, 274–280 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Knowland, D. et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron 82, 603–617 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sun, T. et al. Acoustic cavitation-based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 9079–9094 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tung, Y.-S., Marquet, F., Teichert, T., Ferrera, V. & Konofagou, E. E. Feasibility of noninvasive cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and microbubbles in nonhuman primates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 163704 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, S., Samiotaki, G., Olumolade, O., Feshitan, J. A. & Konofagou, E. E. Microbubble type and distribution dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 40, 130–137 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Choi, J. J. et al. Noninvasive and transient blood-brain barrier opening in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s double transgenic mice using focused ultrasound. Ultrason. Imaging 30, 189–200 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shahriar, S. et al. VEGF-A-mediated venous endothelial cell proliferation results in neoangiogenesis during neuroinflammation. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 1904–1917 (2024).

  45. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Menon, V. Clustering single cells: a review of approaches on high-and low-depth single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief. Funct. Genom. 17, 240–245 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cembrowski, M. S. & Menon, V. Continuous variation within cell types of the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 41, 337–348 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hawrylycz, M. et al. Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1832–1844 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sorensen, S. A. et al. Correlated gene expression and target specificity demonstrate excitatory projection neuron diversity. Cereb. Cortex N.Y. 25, 433–449 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lengfeld, J. E. et al. Endothelial Wnt/β-catenin signaling reduces immune cell infiltration in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1168–E1177 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Platt, M. P. et al. Th17 lymphocytes drive vascular and neuronal deficits in a mouse model of postinfectious autoimmune encephalitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 6708–6716 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Karakatsani, M. E. et al. Amelioration of the nigrostriatal pathway facilitated by ultrasound-mediated neurotrophic delivery in early Parkinson’s disease. J. Controlled Release 303, 289–301 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Prosperetti, A. A general derivation of the subharmonic threshold for non-linear bubble oscillations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 3719–3726 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Prakash, R. & Carmichael, S. T. Blood-brain barrier breakdown and neovascularization processes after stroke and traumatic brain injury. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 28, 556–564 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Protzmann, J., Jung, F., Jakobsson, L. & Fredriksson, L. Analysis of ischemic stroke-mediated effects on blood-brain barrier properties along the arteriovenous axis assessed by intravital two-photon imaging. Fluids Barriers CNS 21, 35 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Davalos, D. & Akassoglou, K. Fibrinogen as a key regulator of inflammation in disease. Semin. Immunopathol. 34, 43–62 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Davalos, D. et al. Fibrinogen-induced perivascular microglial clustering is required for the development of axonal damage in neuroinflammation. Nat. Commun. 3, 1227 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Adams, R. A. et al. The fibrin-derived γ377-395 peptide inhibits microglia activation and suppresses relapsing paralysis in central nervous system autoimmune disease. J. Exp. Med. 204, 571–582 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cortes-Canteli, M. et al. Fibrinogen and β-amyloid association alters thrombosis and fibrinolysis: a possible contributing factor to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 66, 695–709 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Petersen, M. A., Ryu, J. K. & Akassoglou, K. Fibrinogen in neurological diseases: mechanisms, imaging and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 283–301 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ryu, J. K. et al. Blood coagulation protein fibrinogen promotes autoimmunity and demyelination via chemokine release and antigen presentation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8164 (2015).

  63. Vanlandewijck, M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Miao, Z. et al. Putative cell type discovery from single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Methods 17, 621–628 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zarkada, G. et al. Specialized endothelial tip cells guide neuroretina vascularization and blood-retina-barrier formation. Dev. Cell 56, 2237–2251.e6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhao, Q. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal endothelial cell heterogeneity in tumors and changes following antiangiogenic treatment. Cancer Res 78, 2370–2382 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Caskey, C. F., Stieger, S. M., Qin, S., Dayton, P. A. & Ferrara, K. W. Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1191–1200 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Caskey, C. F., Kruse, D. E., Dayton, P. A., Kitano, T. K. & Ferrara, K. W. Microbubble oscillation in tubes with diameters of 12, 25, and 195 microns. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 1–3 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zheng, H. et al. Ultrasound-driven microbubble oscillation and translation within small phantom vessels. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 1978–1987 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sassaroli, E. & Hynynen, K. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 1651–1660 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sassaroli, E. & Hynynen, K. Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: a numerical study. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5292–5305 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Qin, S. & Ferrara, K. W. The natural frequency of nonlinear oscillation of ultrasound contrast agents in microvessels. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 1140–1148 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sheikov, N. et al. Brain arterioles show more active vesicular transport of blood-borne tracer molecules than capillaries and venules after focused ultrasound-evoked opening of the blood-brain barrier. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32, 1399–1409 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shen, L., Weber, C. R. & Turner, J. R. The tight junction protein complex undergoes rapid and continuous molecular remodeling at steady state. J. Cell Biol. 181, 683–695 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Marchiando, A. M. et al. Caveolin-1-dependent occludin endocytosis is required for TNF-induced tight junction regulation in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 189, 111–126 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Beutel, O., Maraspini, R., Pombo-García, K., Martin-Lemaitre, C. & Honigmann, A. Phase separation of zonula occludens proteins drives formation of tight junctions. Cell 179, 923–936.e11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Sheikov, N. A., Jolesz, F. A. & Vykhodtseva, N. Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications. NeuroImage 24, 12–20 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Deng, J. et al. The role of caveolin-1 in blood–brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles. J. Mol. Neurosci. 46, 677–687 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pandit, R. et al. Role for caveolin-mediated transcytosis in facilitating transport of large cargoes into the brain via ultrasound. J. Controlled Release 327, 667–675 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wu, C.-C. et al. Blood-brain barrier opening with neuronavigation-guided focused ultrasound in pediatric patients with diffuse midline glioma Editor’s summary. Sci. Transl. Med. 17, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adq6645 (2025).

  81. Bae, S. et al. Transcranial blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease patients using a portable focused ultrasound system with real-time 2-D cavitation mapping. Theranostics 14, 4519–4535 (2024).

  82. O’Reilly, M. A., Huang, Y. & Hynynen, K. The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model. Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 5251–5267 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Tang, S. C. & Clement, G. T. Acoustic standing wave suppression using randomized phase-shift-keying excitations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1667 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Connor, C. W. & Hynynen, K. Patterns of thermal deposition in the skull during transcranial focused ultrasound surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1693–1706 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Asquier, N. et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption in humans using an implantable ultrasound device: quantification with MR images and correlation with local acoustic pressure. J. Neurosurg. 1–9 https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.JNS182001 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Shutao Wang and Camilo Acosta for their supporting role in this work. T.K., R.L.N., R.J. and E.E.K. were supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG038961. D.A. was supported by the NIH (R01EY033994; R61/33 HL159949; RF1 AG078352, R21NS130265) and by an unrestricted gift to the Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke in the Department of Neurology, CUIMC. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Rebecca Lynn Noel, Tara Kugelman.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Dritan Agalliu, Elisa E. Konofagou.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Rebecca Lynn Noel, Tara Kugelman, Maria Eleni Karakatsani, Moshe J. Willner, Daniella A. Jimenez, Claire Sunha Choi, Yusuke Nimi, Robin Ji & Elisa E. Konofagou

  2. Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Sanjid Shahriar & Dritan Agalliu

  3. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Dritan Agalliu

  4. Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Elisa E. Konofagou

  5. Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Elisa E. Konofagou

Authors
  1. Rebecca Lynn Noel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tara Kugelman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Eleni Karakatsani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sanjid Shahriar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moshe J. Willner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniella A. Jimenez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Claire Sunha Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yusuke Nimi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Robin Ji
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dritan Agalliu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Elisa E. Konofagou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.K., D.A. and E.E.K. conceptualized the project, R.L.N., T.K., M.E.K., C.S.C, S.S., Y.N. and R.J. performed the experiments and analyzed the data, D.A. provided the transgenic mice, D.A. and E.E.K. provided guidance for the analysis of the data & T.K., R.L.N., D.A. and E.E.K. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa E. Konofagou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Some of the work presented is supported by patents optioned to Delsona Therapeutics, Inc. where EEK serves as a co-founder and scientific advisor. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Engineering thanks Wenlu Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: [Liangfei Tian] and [Philip Coatsworth]. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Supplementary Data

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noel, R.L., Kugelman, T., Karakatsani, M.E. et al. Safe focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening is driven primarily by transient reorganization of tight junctions. Commun Eng (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00597-5

Download citation

  • Received: 19 May 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 21 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00597-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Policies
  • Open Access
  • Journal Metrics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Contact
  • Conferences

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Engineering (Commun Eng)

ISSN 2731-3395 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing