Table 5 Analyzing the efficacy of machine-learning models in detecting depression through social media data.
From: A systematic review on automated clinical depression diagnosis
Author | Main findings |
---|---|
Yazdavar et al.74 | Achieved 68% accuracy and 72% precision in identifying clinical depressive symptoms using a semi-supervised statistical model. |
Zogan et al.75 | Proposed a new computational model and achieved a recall of 0.904, precision of 0.909, and F1 score of 0.912. |
Aragón et al.57 | Using fine-grained emotions to obtain competitive results in comparison to state-of-the-art approaches. |
Paul et al.32 | AdaBoost classifier outperformed other methods for depression likelihood assessment. |
Ricard et al.169 | Leveraging community-generated content from social media can be informative for automated depression assessment. |
Peng et al.170 | Demonstrated that a multi-kernel support vector machine is the most appropriate approach to identifying depression in individuals using social media. |
Aldarwish et al.171 | Trained a support vector machine based on term frequency to classify depression levels. |
Chiong et al.31 | The proposed model effectively determines depression presence via social media posts, even when the training datasets do not contain depression-related words. |
Burdisso et al.172 | Introduced a general framework for early depression detection with less computational cost and higher interpretability. |
Smys et al.173 | A machine-learning model consisting of a support vector machine and a naive Bayes model can predict depression in its early stages. |
Bucur et al.174 | Latent semantic analysis shows a significant difference in writing topics depending on users’ mental health. |
Kayalvizhi et al.175 | A word2vec pre-trained word embedding and random forest classifier achieved their best performance with a 0.877 F1 score. |
Mann et al.176 | Fusion model can detect moderate depression or higher with 0.92 recall and 0.69 precision. |
Sadeque et al.177 | Proposed a system to effectively detect depression using social media content with an accuracy of 88% and F1 score of 93%. |
Hussain et al.152 | Application accurately identifies indicators of depression in Facebook users with 94% accuracy. |
Tadesse et al.58 | Achieved 91% accuracy and F1 score of 93% with a multi-layer perceptron algorithm and combined features. |
Fatima et al.178 | Achieved an accuracy, recall, and precision of 91.7% using a combination of text-based features and machine-learning techniques. |
Katchapakirin et al.179 | Facebook behaviors can be used to predict depression levels with an accuracy of 85% and F1 score of 88.9%. |
Shen et al.180 | The model outperformed several baselines by 3% to 10% with an F1 score of 85%. |
Li et al.181 | Proposed a correlation explanation learning algorithm to detect COVID-19-related stress symptoms. |
Lin et al.182 | Social media use is significantly associated with increased depression risk. |