Table 1 Comparison of treatment variables across classes of the five-class model

Medication change

No 81.5% Yes 18.5%

75.9% 24.1%

78.7% 21.3%

76.1% 23.9%

83.3% 16.7%

χ²(4) = 0.691, p = 0.952

Treatment adjusted

No 70.4% Yes 29.6%

85.2% 14.8%

66.0% 34.0%

67.0% 33.0%

83.3% 16.7%

χ²(4) = 7.424, p = 0.115

Intensity (percent)

55.5 (50.6–60.4)

55.5 (52.0–59.0)

50.7 (46.9–54.5)

51.6 (48.9–54.4)

53.5 (46.2–60.8)

F(4,215) = 1.374, p = 0.244

(cgiTBS group) Mean target co-ordinate (MNI)

−42/25/33

−40/22/36

−41/23/34

−41/21/37

−43/22/38

V(Pillai’s Trace) = 0.052, F(12,312) = 0.455, p = 0.939

Mean dist. from target^a (mm)

7.0 (4.8–9.7)

5.8 (4.4–7.5)

5.7 (4.2–7.6)

5.1 (4.1–6.3)

3.9 (1.9–6.9)

F(4,215) = 0.946, p = 0.438

Mean dist. from sess. 1^a (mm)

7.6 (5.7–9.9)

6.4 (5.2–7.9)

6.8 (5.4–8.5)

5.6 (4.7–6.6)

4.8 (2.9–7.5)

F(4,213) = 1.325, p = 0.262

SD of dist. from sess. 1^a (mm)

4.9 (3.7–6.4)^3–5

3.3 (2.6–4.1)

2.9 (2.2–3.8)¹

2.8 (2.3–3.3)¹

2.1 (1.2–3.6)¹

F(4,213) = 3.215, p = 0.014*, η_p² = 0.057

Networks stimulated

3.0 (2.3–3.6)^3–5

2.3 (1.8–2.7)⁵

1.7 (1.2–2.2)¹

1.6 (1.3–2.0)¹

1.1 (0.1–2.0)^1,2

F(4,205) = 4.716, p = 0.001**, η_p² = 0.084

Within-session SD of dist. (mm)^a

2.3 (1.7–3.1)

1.8 (1.4–2.2)

1.9 (1.5–2.4)

1.6 (1.3–1.9)

1.1 (0.6–1.9)

F(4,213) = 2.080, p = 0.084^{^}, η_p² = 0.038

(cgiTBS group) Target distance from −44/40/29^a

19.1 (14.4–24.8)

22.4 (18.5–26.7)

19.6 (16.3–23.4)

23.4 (20.3–26.8)

21.1 (14.2–29.9)

F(4,105) = 0.863, p = 0.489