Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Rethinking ethics in interdisciplinary and big data-driven neuroscience projects

The focus of much of contemporary research ethics is on compliance with established protocols. However, large data-driven neuroscience research raises new ethical concerns that have no agreed-upon solution. Here we reflect on these challenges and propose better integration of public and patient involvement in this evolving landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Freyhofer, H. H. The Nuremberg Medical Trial: the Holocaust and the Origin of the Nuremberg Medical Code (Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).

  2. Klitzman, R. The Ethics Police? The Struggle to Make Human Research Safe (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

  3. Schrag, Z. M. Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965-2009 (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2010).

  4. Bhan, A., Singh, J. A., Upshur, R. E. G., Singer, P. A. & Daar, A. S. PLoS Med. 4, e272–1459 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lönngren, J. & van Poeck, K. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 28, 481–502 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eke, D. et al. Neuroimage Rep. 1, 100053 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ienca, M. et al. Neuroethics 15, 20 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/data-spaces (2024).

  9. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulnicane, I. in Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance: Actors, Practices and Processes (eds Calcara, A. et al.) 177–191 (Routledge, 2020).

  11. Coeckelbergh, M. AI Ethics (MIT Press, 2020).

  12. Roth, G., Heinz, A. & Walter, H. in Psychoneuroscience (eds Roth, G. et al.) 1–14 (Springer, 2023).

  13. Bryant, E. A., Scott, A. M., Greenwood, H. & Thomas, R. BMJ Open 12, e055428 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Happell, B., O’Donovan, A., Sharrock, J., Warner, T. & Gordon, S. Nurse Educ. Today 111, 105324 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. Research Policy 42, 1568–1580 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funded provided by the European Union. Complementary funding was received by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government’s Horizon Europe funding guarantee (10131373and 10038599) and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST) National Key Project of ‘Inter-governmental International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation’ (2023YFE0199700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Carsten Stahl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stahl, B.C., Ogoh, G., Schumann, G. et al. Rethinking ethics in interdisciplinary and big data-driven neuroscience projects. Nat. Mental Health 2, 1128–1130 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00320-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00320-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing