Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Modeling and predicting mood instability in a longitudinal cohort of bipolar disorder

Subjects

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that bipolar disorders are associated with mood instability even outside the context of mood episodes. Here we use data from the Prechter Longitudinal Study of Bipolar Disorder to identify subgroups of individuals with bipolar disorders based on mood instability, identify biopsychosocial predictors of mood instability and determine whether mood instability predicts future outcomes. In a total of 481 participants, mood was assessed every 2 months (Patient Health Questionnaire and Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale) over 5 years, and clinical and functioning outcomes were assessed in year 6. Low, moderate and high mood instability classes were identified. Neuroticism, sleep quality, childhood emotional neglect and physical abuse, stimulant abuse, hypomania age of onset and number of depressive episodes were the most influential predictors of mood instability. Being in the high instability class (based on mood from years 1 to 5) predicted greater suicidal ideation and functional impairment in year 6. In summary, we show that mood instability represents a core phenotype of bipolar disorder with distinct predictors and long-term implications. Routine assessment may improve personalization in bipolar disorder treatment and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Diagram of study aims and statistical analysis.
Fig. 2: STROBE diagram.
Fig. 3: LPA on intraindividual mood dynamics.
Fig. 4: Optimized RF variables of importance plot.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data collected at the University of Michigan require a fully executed Data Use Agreement to be shared outside of the institution. Longitudinal and outcomes data used in the present study, along with data dictionaries, are available subject to review of the proposed analyses and acceptance of a Data Use Agreement. Enquiries can be addressed at https://medresearch.umich.edu/labs-departments/centers/prechter-program/research/longitudinal-study-bipolar-disorder/data-requests-repositories.

Code availability

All Mplus and R codes are provided on the Open Science Framework webpage: https://osf.io/3ms7b/.

References

  1. Roshanaei-Moghaddam, B. & Katon, W. Premature mortality from general medical illnesses among persons with bipolar disorder: a review. Psychiatr. Serv. 60, 147–156 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dilsaver, S. C. An estimate of the minimum economic burden of bipolar I and II disorders in the United States: 2009. J. Affect. Disord. 129, 79–83 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yocum, A. K., Friedman, E., Bertram, H. S., Han, P. & McInnis, M. G. Comparative mortality risks in two independent bipolar cohorts. Psychiatry Res. 330, 115601 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sperry, S. H., Yocum, A. K. & McInnis, M. G. Mood instability metrics to stratify individuals and measure outcomes in bipolar disorder. Nat. Ment. Health 2, 1111–1119 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Henry, C. et al. Affective lability and affect intensity as core dimensions of bipolar disorders during euthymic period. Psychiatry Res. 159, 1–6 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stanislaus, S. et al. Mood instability in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, unaffected relatives, and healthy control individuals measured daily using smartphones. J. Affect. Disord. 271, 336–344 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stapp, E. K. et al. Specificity of affective dynamics of bipolar and major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. 13, e3134 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sperry, S. H. & Kwapil, T. R. Affective dynamics in bipolar spectrum psychopathology: modeling inertia, reactivity, variability, and instability in daily life. J. Affect. Disord. 251, 195–204 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sperry, S. H. & Kwapil, T. R. Bipolar spectrum psychopathology is associated with altered emotion dynamics across multiple timescales. Emotion 22, 627 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sperry, S. H., Walsh, M. A. & Kwapil, T. R. Emotion dynamics concurrently and prospectively predict mood psychopathology. J. Affect. Disord. 261, 67–75 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. von Hofacker, A. J. et al. Predictors of mood and activity instability in participants with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder—exploratory findings from a prospective cohort study. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 15, 100708 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strejilevich, S. et al. Mood instability and functional recovery in bipolar disorders. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 128, 194–202 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gershon, A. & Eidelman, P. Inter-episode affective intensity and instability: predictors of depression and functional impairment in bipolar disorder. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 46, 14–18 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faurholt-Jepsen, M. et al. Is smartphone-based mood instability associated with stress, quality of life, and functioning in bipolar disorder? Bipolar Disord. 21, 611–620 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnett, J. et al. Personality and bipolar disorder: dissecting state and trait associations between mood and personality. Psychol. Med. 41, 1593–1604 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, K. A. et al. Predictive evidence for the impact of personality styles on depression and functioning in two bipolar disorder cohorts. J. Affect. Disord. 380, 746–755 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Faurholt-Jepsen, M. et al. Mood instability and activity/energy instability in patients with bipolar disorder according to day-to-day smartphone-based data—an exploratory post hoc study. J. Affect. Disord. 334, 83–91 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kessing, L. V. & Faurholt-Jepsen, M. Mood instability—a new outcome measure in randomised trials of bipolar disorder? Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 58, 39–41 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg, J. F. et al. Manic symptoms during depressive episodes in 1,380 patients with bipolar disorder: findings from the STEP-BD. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 173–181 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson, D., Ellickson-Larew, S., Stanton, K., Levin-Aspenson, H. F. & Khoo, S. Examining the criterion validity and diagnostic specificity of self-report measures of narcissism and mania. Assessment 28, 3–14 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yocum, A. K. et al. Cohort profile update: the Heinz C. Prechter Longitudinal Study of Bipolar Disorder. Int. J. Epidemiol. 52, e324–e331 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. McInnis, M. G. et al. Cohort profile: the Heinz C. Prechter Longitudinal Study of Bipolar Disorder. Int. J. Epidemiol. 47, 28–28n (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nurnberger, J. I. Jr. et al. Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. NIMH Genetics Initiative. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51, 849–859 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R. & Kupfer, D. J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index—a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28, 193–213 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roenneberg, T., Wirz-Justice, A. & Merrow, M. Life between clocks: daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 80–90 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernstein, D. et al. Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. Am. J. Psychiatry 151, 1132–1136 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO-PI: Professional Manual (Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992).

  28. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16, 606–613 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Altman, E. G., Hedeker, D., Peterson, J. L. & Davis, J. M. The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Biol. Psychiatry 42, 948–955 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johns, M. W. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 14, 540–545 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., Monteiro, M. G. & World Health Organization. AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary health care (World Health Organization, 2001).

  32. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M. & Keller, S. D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 34, 220–233 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Altshuler, L., Mintz, J. & Leight, K. The Life Functioning Questionnaire (LFQ): a brief, gender-neutral scale assessing functional outcome. Psychiatry Res. 112, 161–182 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McNeish, D. & Hamaker, E. L. A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychol. Methods 25, 610–635 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (ed. Hoyle, R. H.) (Guilford Press, 2021).

  36. Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K. & Faubert, S. J. Latent class analysis: a guide to best practice. J. Black Psychol. 46, 287–311 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

With gratitude, we acknowledge the Prechter Bipolar Longitudinal Research participants and thank the research team of the University of Michigan Prechter Bipolar Research Program for their contributions in the collection and stewardship of the data used in this publication. We acknowledge the funding for this study, including the Prechter Family Charitable Fund (to M.G.M.) and the Richard Tam Foundation (to M.G.M.). S.H.S. has grant-funded support for the present paper from a Brain and Behavior Foundation Young Investigator Award (number 30719; S.H.S.), a National Institute of Mental Health Loan Repayment Award (L30MH127613; S.H.S.) and a National Institute of Mental Health K23 Career Development Award (K23MH131601; S.H.S.). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.R.S.: methodology, formal analysis and writing (original draft). A.K.Y.: methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing (original draft) and visualization. M.G.M.: conceptualization, resources, writing (review and editing), supervision and funding acquisition. I.F.T.: conceptualization, writing (review and editing) and supervision. S.H.S.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing (original draft), visualization, supervision, project administration and funding acquisition. A.R.S., A.K.Y. and S.H.S. all accessed the data, verified the data and replicated all results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah H. Sperry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.R.S., A.K.Y., M.G.M. and I.F.T. have no competing interests to disclose. S.H.S. serves as an ad hoc consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks Jess G. Fiedorowicz, Pedro Vieira Da Silva Magalhães and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–8, Figs. 1 and 2, Appendices 1–4, and Supplementary and Appendix References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stromberg, A.R., Yocum, A.K., McInnis, M.G. et al. Modeling and predicting mood instability in a longitudinal cohort of bipolar disorder. Nat. Mental Health 3, 1267–1275 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00506-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00506-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing