Table 2 Experiment 5: Regression results predicting affective polarisation
From: Inoculation reduces social media engagement with affectively polarized content in the UK and US
Predictors | Estimates | CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 0.54 | 0.54–0.55 | <0.001 |
Group [Inoculation] | 0.00 | –0.00–0.01 | 0.286 |
Stance [Pro-life] | 0.00 | –0.01–0.01 | 0.719 |
Political [Independent] | –0.00 | –0.01–0.01 | 0.950 |
Political [Prefer not to answer] | 0.02 | –0.01–0.04 | 0.231 |
Political [Republican] | 0.01 | –0.00–0.02 | 0.222 |
Group [Inoculation] × Stance [Pro-life] | –0.01 | –0.02–0.01 | 0.319 |
Group [Inoculation] × Political [Independent] | –0.01 | –0.02–0.01 | 0.306 |
Group [Inoculation] × Political [Prefer not to answer] | –0.04 | –0.09–0.00 | 0.051 |
Group [Inoculation] × Political [Republican] | –0.01 | –0.03–0.01 | 0.175 |
Stance [Pro-life] × Political [Independent] | –0.01 | –0.02–0.01 | 0.355 |
Stance [Pro-life] × Political [Prefer not to answer] | –0.03 | –0.06–0.01 | 0.133 |
Stance [Pro-life] × Political [Republican] | –0.01 | –0.02–0.01 | 0.297 |
(Group [Inoculation] × Stance [Pro-life]) | 0.01 | –0.01–0.03 | 0.338 |
× Political [Independent] | |||
(Group [Inoculation] × Stance [Pro-life]) | 0.05 | –0.02–0.12 | 0.137 |
× Political [Prefer not to answer] | |||
(Group [Inoculation] × Stance [Pro-life]) | 0.02 | –0.01–0.04 | 0.181 |
× Political [Republican] | |||
Observations | 645 | ||
R2/Adjusted R2 | 0.019/–0.004 | ||
