Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The governance of informal street work in San Francisco and New York City

Abstract

How do local regulations and practices enable or constrain informal work’s potential to contribute to inclusive economic development in US cities? Amid employment and migration crises, informal work provides critical safety nets for those excluded from formal labor markets. Urban planning approaches in San Francisco and New York City often dismiss, disregard or disable informal workers. Examining street vendors and waste pickers, we show how status quo regulatory approaches are not only exclusionary but also miss opportunities to recognize these workers’ contributions. We draw from case studies in the Global South to propose an alternate, inclusive governance approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghertner, D. A. in Worlding Cities (eds Roy, A. & Ong, A.) 279–306 (Wiley, 2011).

  2. Leal Martínez, A. in Futureproof: Security Aesthetics and the Management of Life (eds Ghertner, D. A. et al.) 245–270 (Duke Univ. Press, 2020).

  3. Tucker, J. & Devlin, R. T. Uncertainty and the governance of street vending: a critical comparison across the north/south divide. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 43, 460–475 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carré, F. in The Informal Economy Revisited: Examining the Past, Envisioning the Future (eds Chen, M. & Carré, F. J.) 52–59 (Routledge, 2020).

  5. ILO. Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture (International Labour Organization, 2018).

  6. Definitions of Informal Economy, Informal Sector and Informal Employment (OECD Publishing, 2019).

  7. Chen, M. A. The Informal Economy: Definitions, Theories and Policies (Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), 2012).

  8. Marinic, G. & Meninato, P. (eds) Informality and the City: Theories, Actions and Interventions 1st edn (Springer, 2022).

  9. Alejo, E. & Schoenecker, A. Policies of exclusion: space, time and the informal economy in Chicago. Space Cult 23, 477–491 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Devlin, R. T. Asking ‘Third World questions’ of First World informality: using Southern theory to parse needs from desires in an analysis of informal urbanism of the Global North. Plan. Theory 17, 568–587 (2018).

  11. Devlin, R. T. ‘An area that governs itself’: informality, uncertainty and the management of street vending in New York City. Plan. Theory 10, 53–65 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duneier, M. Sidewalk 1st edn (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1999).

  13. Dunn, K. in Food Trucks, Cultural Identity and Social Justice (eds Agyeman, J. et al.) 67–86 (MIT Press, 2017).

  14. Ehrenfeucht, R. Designing fair and effective street vending policy: it’s time for a new approach. Cityscape 18, 11–26 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gowan, T. Hobos, Hustlers and Backsliders: Homeless in San Francisco (Univ. of Minnesota Press, 2010).

  16. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. & Ehrenfeucht, R. Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation over Public Space (MIT Press, 2009).

  17. Martin, N. Food fight! Immigrant street vendors, gourmet food trucks and the differential valuation of creative producers in Chicago. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 38, 1867–1883 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, N. in Food Trucks, Cultural Identity and Social Justice (eds Agyeman, J. et al.) 207–224 (MIT Press, 2017).

  19. Mukhija, V. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor (MIT Press, 2014).

  20. Porras Bulla, J., Rendon, M. & Espluga Trenc, J. Policing the stigma in our waste: what we know about informal waste pickers in the global north. Local Environ. 26, 1299–1312 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosales, R. Fruteros: Street Vending, Illegality and Ethnic Community in Los Angeles (Univ. of California Press, 2020).

  22. Farah, I. The Scramble for the City: Street Vending, Politics and the Governance of Public Space in Mexico City and San Francisco (UC Berkeley, 2024).

  23. Harvey, J., Hegel, C. & Hartmann, C. Independent recyclers in New York City: sector profile and pathways to inclusion. surewecan.org http://www.surewecan.org/study2023 (2023).

  24. Immigration Research Initative. Street Vendors of New York (Immigration Research Initiative, 2024).

  25. Devlin, R. T. No Place for Street Vendors: Global Capital and Local Exclusion in an East Asian Immigrant Enclave of New York City (WIEGO, 2020).

  26. Devlin, R. T. Winning a Right to the Sidewalks: Street Vendors in New York (WIEGO, 2021).

  27. Farah, I. The legitimacy trap: street vending heterogeneity and selective enforcement in San Francisco. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. (in the press).

  28. Hegel, C. & Hartmann, C. COVID-19 Crisis and the Informal Economy: Canners in New York City, USA (WIEGO, 2021).

  29. Levi-Faur, D. & Kariv-Teitelbaum, Y. in The SAGE Handbook of Political Science (eds Berg-Schlosser, D. et al.) 1152–1172 (Sage, 2020).

  30. Harvey, D. The right to the city. New Left Rev 53, 23–40 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blomley, N. Rights of Passage: Sidewalks and the Regulation of Public Flow (Routledge, 2011).

  32. Heathcott, J., Soffer, J. & Zimmerman, R. (eds) Urban Infrastructure: Historical and Social Dimensions of an Interconnected World (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2022).

  33. Edwards, S., Cordle, M., Jamieson, O. & Grushack, S. Employment and Economic Impact of Container Deposits (Eunomia, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. New York Bottle Bill Resource Guide (Container Recycling Institute, 2023).

  35. Zimring, C. A. Cash For Your Trash: Scrap Recycling in America (Rutgers Univ. Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Message in a bottle. nypirg.org https://www.nypirg.org/pubs/202405/BBBB_Final_Media_5.6.24.pdf (New York Public Interest Research Group, 2024).

  37. DSNY Rules and Regulations. A Summary of Sanitation Rules and Regulations (New York Department of Sanitation, 2015).

  38. WIEGO Blog. In India, Pune’s poorest operate one of the world’s most cost-effective waste management models. WIEGO https://www.wiego.org/blog/india-pune%E2%80%99s-poorest-operate-world%E2%80%99s-most-cost-effective-waste-management-models (2019).

  39. Parra, F. & Abizaid, O. Formalization as Public Service Providers: Achievements and Obstacles for Colombia’s Waste Pickers (WIEGO, 2021).

  40. Dias, S. M. Recycling in Belo Horizonte, Brazil—An Overview of Inclusive Programming (WIEGO, 2011).

  41. Chikarmane, P. & Narayanan, L. Statistics on Waste Pickers: A Case Studies Guide (WIEGO, 2024).

  42. Reynoso, T. R. & Vanek, J. Street Vendors and Market Traders in 12 Countries: A Statistical Profile (WIEGO, 2024).

  43. Street Vendors Act. mohua.gov.in https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/StreetVendorAct2014_English(1).pdf (2014).

  44. Nicholls, W. J. & Baran, I. Bureaucratic politicisation and insurgent bureaucrats: a theoretical framework. Antipode 56, 2293–2320 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.F., R.T.D., C. Hartmann, J.H. and C. Hegel jointly conceived the idea for this manuscript through discussions initiated at the 2023 and 2024 Urban Affairs Association conferences and continued via weekly meetings. All authors collaboratively contributed to writing the manuscript, reviewing relevant literature, synthesizing key insights and refining the core arguments. All authors provided critical revisions and participated actively in the final editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Farah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Cities thanks Caroline Skinner, Jing Hiah and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farah, I., Devlin, R.T., Hartmann, C. et al. The governance of informal street work in San Francisco and New York City. Nat Cities (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00321-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00321-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing