Table 6 Performances of LMO composites
From: Lithium resources and novel strategies for their extraction and purification
Binder | LMO precursors | Brine | pH | Sorption time (hour) | Li uptake (mg·g−1) | Recyclability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVC | Li1.6Mn1.6O4 | Artificial seawater, 150 (mg·L−1) | 12 | 2 | 26.64 | 8 cycles, 98% | |
PAM | Li1.33Mn1.67O4 | Qarhan brine, 113 (mg·L−1) | 6.4 | 20 | 4.34 | 30 cycles, slightly decrease | |
PAN | Li1.6Mn1.6O4 | LiCl/LiOH solution, 35 (mg·L−1) | 11 | 24 | 10.3 | 10 cycles, 96.2% | |
PVA | Li1.6Mn1.6O4 | LiCl/LiOH solution, 7-35 (mg·L−1) | 11 | 24 | 6.9 | 5 cycles, remain constant | |
PVDF | Li1.33Mn1.67O4 | LiCl solution, 100 (mg·L−1) | 9 | 1 | 27.8 | 6 cycles, 91% | |
AAB | HMO | Li spiked seawater, 30 (mg·L−1) | 7.8 | 72 | 21.7 | 14 cycles, 98% | |
Chitosan | Li1.33Mn1.67O4 | Li spiked seawater, 30.2 (mg·L−1) | 7-8 | 72 | 11.4 | - | |
Cellulose | HMO | LiCl solution, 75 (mg·L−1) | 8.76 | 48 | 21.6 | 8 cycles, 83% |
