Table 2 Summary of clinical trials investigating the benefits of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in ACS patients

From: Intravascular imaging for acute coronary syndrome

Trial

Year

Study Design

Study Population

Comparison

IVI criteria for optimal PCI

Follow-up

Primary endpoint and results

OCTACS108

2015

RCT

NSTEMI

OCT (n = 40)

vs.

Angio (n = 45)

• Relative stent expansion of >90% (MSA divided by distal/proximal reference lumen area)

• No malapposition with ≥3 struts per cross-sectional area with axial distance >140 μm

• No stent edge dissection (causing a MLA < 4 mm2)

• Residual stenosis (causing a MLA < 4 mm2)

6-month OCT follow-up

• Strut coverage

(1) Percentage of uncovered struts: 4.3% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.01

(2) Percentage of completely covered stents:

17.5% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.02

DOCTORS109

2016

RCT

NSTE-ACS

OCT (n = 120)

vs.

Angio (n = 120)

• Relative stent expansion of >90% (MSA divided by distal/proximal reference lumen area)

• No stent edge dissection

NA

• Post-PCI FFR: 0.94 ± 0.04 versus 0.92 ± 0.05, P = 0.005

Kala et al.110

2018

RCT

STEMI

OCT (n = 105)

vs.

Angio (n = 96)

• Relative stent expansion of >80% (MSA divided by average reference lumen area) or >90% (MSA divided by distal reference lumen area)

• No significant malapposition

• No stent edge dissection

9-month OCT and clinical follow-up

• OCT-detected in-stent area stenosis: 6% vs. 18%, p = 0.0002

• MACE: 3% vs. 2%, p = 0.87

COREA-AMI112

2021

Retro

ACS

IVUS (n = 2,032)

vs.

Angio (n = 7,814)

No dedicated criteria for IVUS-guided PCI

4-year follow-up

• MACE: 15.3% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001

KAMIR-NIH113

2022

Retro

ACS

IVUS (n = 1,887) vs.

Angio (n = 7,120)

No dedicated criteria for IVUS-guided PCI

3-year follow-up

• Target lesion failure: 4.8% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001

KAMIR-NIH114

2023

Retro

ACS

IVUS (n = 879)

vs.

Angio (n = 3,191)

No dedicated criteria for IVUS-guided PCI

3-year follow-up

• Target lesion failure: 6.7% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.001

IVUS-ACS7

2024

RCT

ACS

IVUS (n = 105)

vs.

Angio (n = 96)

For non-left main coronary arteries:

• MSA > 5.0 mm2 or relative stent expansion of >80% (MSA divided by distal reference lumen area)

• Residual PB < 55% within 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent edge

• The absence of dissection over 3 mm in length

For left main coronary arteries:

• MSA > 10 mm² for the left main segment, > 7 mm² for the ostial or proximal LAD, and > 6 mm² for the ostial or proximal LCx

1-year clinical follow-up

• Target vessel failure: 4.0% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.0001

KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-V115

2024

Retro

ACS

OCT (n = 535)

vs.

IVUS (n = 4,725)

No dedicated criteria for imaging-guided PCI

1-year follow-up

• Target lesion failure: 2.1% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.11

OPINION ACS111

2024

RCT

ACS

OCT (n = 70) vs. IVUS (n = 69)

• Relative stent expansion of >80% (MSA divided by the mean reference lumen area)

• Incomplete stent apposition

8-month OCT follow-up

•In-stent MLA: 4.91 (4.53-5.30) mm2 vs. 4.76 (4.35-5.17) mm2, p for non-inferiority <0.001

  1. RCT Randomized Controlled Trial, Retro Retrospective Study, STEMI ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, MLA Minimal Lumen Area, LAD Left Anterior Descending artery, LCx Left Circumflex artery, FFR Fractional Flow Reserve.