Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Digitization as a research methodology in colonial natural history collections

Many natural history collections have links to colonial pasts, and violent extraction practices are intertwined with their material value. We propose treating digitization practices for colonial natural history collections as research, and emphasize the need for analysis and discussion of the colonial past and metadata design to fully display their complexities and ambiguities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Remes, K., Unwin, D. M., Klein, N., Heinrich, W.-D. & Hampe, O. in Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: Understanding the Life of Giants (eds Klein, N. et al.) 305–316 (Indiana Univ. Press, 2011).

  2. Heumann, I., Stoecker, H. & Vennen, M. in Deconstructing Dinosaurs. The History of the German Tendaguru Exhibition and Its Finds, 1906–2023 (eds Heumann, I. et al.) 255–272 (Brill, 2024).

  3. Sadock, M. & Magani, H. H. in Deconstructing Dinosaurs. The History of the German Tendaguru Exhibition and Its Finds, 1906-2023 (eds Heumann, I. et al.) 47–61 (Brill, 2024).

  4. Bishop, C. The serendipity of connectivity: piecing together women’s lives in the digital archive. Womens Hist. Rev. 26, 766–780 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaagsma, G. Digital history and the politics of digitization. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit. 38, 830–851 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reed, B. Reinventing access. Arch. Manuscr. 42, 123–132 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaiser, K. et al. Promises of mass digitisation and the colonial realities of natural history collections. J. Nat. Sci. Collect. 11, 13–25 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kizhner, I. et al. Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit. 36, 607–640 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, S. R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M., Russell, K. & Stall, S. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for Indigenous data futures. Sci. Data 8, 108 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

V.D.D., S.A., K.K., I.H. and D.S. thank the DFG (project number 511945957) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verónica Díez Díaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díez Díaz, V., Akhlaq, S., Kaiser, K. et al. Digitization as a research methodology in colonial natural history collections. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 145–146 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00031-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00031-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing