Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Planning for equitable carbon removal governance

With growing investment in technological options for durable, large-scale carbon removal projects, there is an opportunity for planners to consider what equitable models of carbon removal development and deployment might look like in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Davis, J. & Mortimer, P. Unlocking the potential of carbon dioxide removal. OliverWyman https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2024/jun/carbon-dioxide-removal-solutions.html (2024).

  2. Dell’Angelo, J., D’Odorico, P., Rulli, M. C. & Marchand, P. The tragedy of the grabbed commons: coercion and dispossession in the global land rush. World Dev. 92, 1–12 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buck, H. J. Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications. Clim. Change 139, 155–167 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lezaun, J. Hugging the shore: tackling marine carbon dioxide removal as a local governance problem. Front. Clim. 3, 684063 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, S. F. & Qayyum, F. Land acquisition governance and its implications for renewable energy development in Indonesia and the Philippines. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 44, 2056–2067 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. International Energy Agency. Direct air capture. IEA https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage/direct-air-capture (2024).

  7. Nawaz, S., McLaren, D., Caggiano, H., Hudson, A. D. & Scott-Buechler, C. Carbon removal for a just transition. Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2418305 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergman, A. et al. Give communities control of carbon removal. The New Republic (11 April 2022).

  9. Nawaz, S., Scott-Buechler, C. & Caggiano, H. An independent public engagement body is needed to responsibly scale carbon removal in the US. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 011002 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forester, J. F. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (MIT Press, 1999).

  11. Healey, P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Red Globe Press London, 1997).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks S. Nawaz and G. Belotti at American University’s Institute for Responsible Carbon Removal for their thoughtful feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Caggiano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caggiano, H. Planning for equitable carbon removal governance. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 1, 309–310 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00058-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00058-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing