Abstract
Study design:
Multi-centre prospective descriptive study.
Objective:
To establish a profile of the population affected with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) admitted to rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) and to describe determinants of length of stay (LOS) and functional outcome.
Setting:
Eleven rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands and Flanders.
Patients:
A total of 919 patients with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI on first admission to rehabilitation centres between 2002 and 2007.
Methods:
Information about LOS, functional outcome and personal and injury characteristics was derived from a joint data set developed for this project.
Results:
A total of 54.7% of patients with SCI had a non-traumatic lesion. The group of patients with non-traumatic SCI showed a more even gender distribution, a more advanced age and less severe lesion characteristics than the group of patients with traumatic SCI. Linear regression models explained 32% of the variance of LOS and 42% of the variance of functional outcome. Functional status on admission was the strongest determinant of LOS and completeness of the lesion was the strongest determinant of functional outcome. Aetiology (traumatic versus non-traumatic) was a weak independent determinant of LOS but was not an independent determinant of functional outcome.
Conclusion:
Patients with non-traumatic SCI formed a majority in the Dutch and Flemish SCI population. Although the characteristics of patients with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI clearly differed, rehabilitation of patients with non-traumatic SCI appears at least as efficient as rehabilitation of patients with traumatic SCI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Wyndaele M, Wyndaele J-J . Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 523–529.
Ones K, Yilmaz E, Beydogan A, Gultekin O, Caglar N . Comparison of functional results in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1185–1191.
Van Asbeck FWA, Post MWM, Pangalila RF . An epidemiological description of spinal cord injuries in The Netherlands in 1994. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 420–424.
Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, DeVivo M, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T et al. International spinal cord injury data sets. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 530–534.
DeVivo M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T et al. International spinal cord injury core data set. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 535–540.
Maynard Jr FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno Jr JF, Donovan WH, Ducker TB . International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 266–274.
Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH . Rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord lesions in The Netherlands: an epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 679–683.
Celani MG, Spizzichino L, Ricci S, Zampolini M, Franceschini M, Retrospective Study Group on SCI. Spinal cord injury in Italy: a multicenter retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 589–596.
McKinley WO, Steel RT, Hardman JT . Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 619–623.
Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, Duggal N . Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine 2006; 31: 799–805.
Jackson AB, Dijkers M, Devivo MJ, Poczatek RB . A demographic profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries: change and stability over 30 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1740–1748.
Citterio A, Franceschini M, Spizzichino L, Reggio A, Rossi B, Stampaccia G et al. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1483–1487.
New PW, Rawicki HB, Bailey MJ . Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: demographic characteristics and complications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 996–1001.
Eastwood EA, Hagglund KJ, Ragnarsson KT, Gordon WA, Marino RJ . Medical rehabilitation length of stay and outcomes for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury—1990–1997. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1457–1463.
Tooth L, McKenna K, Geraghty T . Rehabilitation outcomes in traumatic spinal cord injury in Australia: functional status, length of stay and discharge setting. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 220–230.
Ronen J, Itzkovich M, Bluvshtein V, Thaleisnik M, Goldin D, Gelernter I et al. Length of stay in hospital following spinal cord lesions in Israel. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 353–358.
Sumida M, Fujimoto M, Tokuhiro A, Tominaga T, Magara A, Uchida R . Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 391–395.
Post MWM, Dallmeijer AJ, Angenot ELD, Van Asbeck FWA, Van der Woude LHV . Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord injury rehabilitation in The Netherlands. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 75–86.
Eriks IE, Angenot ELD, Lankhorst GJ . Epidural metastatic spinal cord compression: functional outcome and survival after inpatient rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 235–239.
Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C . Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 133–143.
Post MW, Van Asbeck FW, Van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJ . Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 109–115.
New PW, Sundararajan V . Incidence of non-traumatic spinal cord injury in Victoria, Australia: a population-based study and literature review. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 406–411.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the participation in this study of the following centres and physicians: Rehabilitation Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam: CAJ Smit, MD; Sophia Stichting, Den Haag: M Rol, MD; Rehabilitation Centre Heliomare, Wijk aan Zee: JR Slootman, MD; Rehabilitation Centre Hoensbroeck, Hoensbroeck: HMH Bongers-Janssen, MD; University Hospital Pellenberg, Leuven: C Kiekens, MD, PhD; St Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen: HJM van Kuppevelt, MD; Rehabilitation Centre Het Roessingh, Enschede: AV Nene, MD, PhD; GJ Snoek, MD, PhD; Rehabilitation Centre Rijndam, Rotterdam: TAR Sluis, MD; ZNA Middelheim, Antwerpen: PM Herregods, MD, PhD; University Medical Centre Groningen, location Beatrixoord, Haren: GA Mulder, MD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osterthun, R., Post, M., van Asbeck, F. et al. Characteristics, length of stay and functional outcome of patients with spinal cord injury in Dutch and Flemish rehabilitation centres. Spinal Cord 47, 339–344 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.127
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.127
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Electrical stimulation to prevent recurring pressure ulcers in individuals with a spinal cord injury compared to usual care: the Spinal Cord Injury PREssure VOLTage (SCI PREVOLT) study protocol
Trials (2022)
-
Rehabilitation length of stay and functional improvement among patients with traumatic spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2022)
-
Retrospective trends in length of stay and bowel management at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation among individuals with spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2022)
-
Effects of a rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in Shanghai, China
BMC Health Services Research (2020)
-
Epidemiological profile of spinal cord injuries at a tertiary rehabilitation center in Kuwait
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2018)
