Abstract
Study design:
Review.
Objectives:
To identify the pressure ulcer healing assessment instrument that is the best choice for use in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Methods:
Articles were retrieved from PubMed. Inclusion criteria were written in English, published up to December 2008 and describing instruments evaluated in more than one study. Search terms were pressure ulcer, wound healing, severity of illness index, reproducibility of results, sensitivity and specificity. Articles describing pressure ulcer staging scales and articles not describing clinimetric properties of an instrument were excluded. Validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility for routine clinical use were described of all instruments evaluated in two or more studies.
Results:
Eleven instruments were described. Clinimetric information was incomplete for all instruments. Clinimetric information was most complete and promising for two instruments: ‘ruler length and width’ and the ‘Sessing’ scale. The ruler method showed good intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and good concurrent validity. The ‘Sessing’ scale has a moderate concurrent validity but was not tested for its responsiveness.
Conclusion:
Further study of the clinimetric properties of pressure ulcer assessment instruments is necessary before the best instrument can be selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, De Vivo MJ . Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1402–1410.
Raghavan P, Raza WA, Ahmed YS, Chamberlain MA . Prevalence of pressure sores in community sample of spinal injury patients. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 879–884.
Ferrell BA . Assessment of healing. Clin Geriatr Med 1997; 13: 575–586.
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Following Spinal Cord Injury. A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals. Paralyzed Veterans of America: Washington DC, 2001.
Emparanza JI, Aranegui P, Ruiz MM, Perez E . A simple severity index for pressure ulcers. J Wound Care 2000; 9: 86–90.
Pedley GE . Comparison of pressure ulcer grading scales: a study of clinical utility and inter-rater reliability. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 41: 129–140.
Thomas DR . Existing tools: are they meeting the challenges of pressure ulcer healing? Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 86–90.
Woodbury MG, Houghton PE, Campbell KE, Keast DH . Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999; 45: 42–55.
Harding KG . Methods for assessing change in ulcer status. Adv Wound Care 1995; 8: 37s–42s.
Mullins M, Thomason SS, Legro M . Monitoring pressure ulcer healing in persons with disabilities. Rehabil Nurs 2005; 30: 92–99.
Schubert V, Zander M . Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care 1996; 9: 29–36.
Berg W, Traneroth C, Gunnarsson A, Lossing C . A method for measuring pressure sores. Lancet 1990; 335: 1445–1446.
Cutler NR, George R, Seifert RD, Brunelle R, Sramek JJ, McNeill K et al. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements. Decubitus 1993; 6: 22–30.
Resch CS, Kerner E, Robson MC, Heggers JP, Scherer M, Boertman JA et al. Pressure sore volume measurement, a technique to document and record wound healing. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36: 444–446.
Hayward PG, Hillman GR, Quast MJ, Robson MC . Surface area measurement of pressure sores using wound molds and computerized imaging. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 238–240.
Kundin JI . A new way to size up a wound. Am J Nurs 1989; 89: 206–207.
Bohannon RW, Pfaller BA . Documentation of wound surface area from tracings of wound perimeters. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1622–1624.
Lucas C, Classen J, Harrison D, De Haan RJ . Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Adv Skin Wound Care 2002; 15: 17–23.
Griffin JW, Tolley EA, Tooms RE, Reyes RA, Clifft JK . A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 117–122.
Thomas AC, Wysocki AB . The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement. Decubitus 1990; 3: 18–25.
Palmer RM, Ring EFJ, Ledgard L . A digital video technique for radiographs and monitoring ulcers. J Photogr Sci 1989; 37: 65–67.
Russell L, Reynolds T, Carr J, Evans A, Holmes M . A comparison of healing rates on two pressure-relieving systems. Br J Nurs 2000; 9: 2270–2280.
Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht M . Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Decubitus 1992; 5: 20–28.
Stotts NA, Rodeheaver GT, Thomas DR, Frantz RA, Bartolucci AA, Sussman C et al. An instrument to measure healing in pressure ulcers: development and validation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: M795–M799.
Ferrell BA . The Sessing scale for measurement of pressure ulcer healing. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 78–80.
Plassmann P, Melhuish JM, Harding KG . Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study. Ostotomy Wound Manage 1994; 40: 50–60.
Covington JS, Griffin JW, Mendius RK, Tooms RE, Clifft JK . Measurement of pressure ulcer volume using dental impression materials: suggestion from the field. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 690–694.
Hooker EZ, Sibley P, Nemchausky B, Lopez E . A method for quantifying the area of closed pressure sores by sinography and digitometry. J Neurosci Nurs 1988; 20: 118–127.
Bates-Jensen BM . The Pressure Sore Status Tool, a few thousand assessments later. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 65–73.
Bates-Jensen B . The Wound Intelligence System: early issues and findings from multi-site tests. Ostomy Wound Manage 1996; 42 (10Asuppl): 53s–61s.
Bates-Jensen BM . Toward an intelligent wound assessment system. Ostomy Wound Manage 1995; 41 (7A): 80s–87s.
Maklebust J . PUSH Tool reality check: audience response. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 102–106.
Bartolucci AA, Thomas DR . Using principal component analysis to describe wound status. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 93–95.
Pompeo M . Implementing the PUSH Tool in clinical practice: revisions and results. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49: 32–46.
Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Bergquist S, Shin CD . A prospective study of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60A: 93–97.
Berlowitz DR, Ratliff C, Cuddigan J, Rodeheaver GT . The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005; 18: 480–483.
Ferrell BA, Artinian BM, Sessing D . The Sessing scale for assessment of pressure ulcer healing. Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 37–40.
Ferrell BA, Keeler E, Siu AL, Ahn S, Osterweil D . Cost-effectiveness of low-air-loss beds for treatment of pressure ulcers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50A: M141–M146.
Robson MC, Maggi SP, Smith PD, Wassermann RJ, Mosiello GC, Hill DP et al. Ease of wound closure as an endpoint of treatment efficacy. Wound Rep Reg 1999; 7: 90–96.
Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury MG, Keast DH . Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 2000; 46: 20–30.
Sussman C, Swanson G . Utility of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool in predicting wound healing outcomes in physical therapy. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 74–77.
Sanada H, Moriguchi T, Miyachi Y, Ohura T, Nakajo T, Tokunaga K et al. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. J Wound Care 2004; 13: 13–18.
Frantz RA, Johnson DA . Stereophotography and computerized image analysis: a three-dimensional method of measuring wound healing. Wounds 1992; 4: 58–64.
Sussman C . Presenting a draft pressure ulcer scale to monitor healing. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Lis, M., van Asbeck, F. & Post, M. Monitoring healing of pressure ulcers: a review of assessment instruments for use in the spinal cord unit. Spinal Cord 48, 92–99 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.146
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.146
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Telephone-based management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low- and middle-income countries: a randomised controlled trial
Spinal Cord (2017)
-
Bedside prediction of the progress of pressure ulcer healing in patients with spinal cord injury using the ‘Decu-stick’
Spinal Cord (2015)
