Abstract
Study design:
Single-centre, prospective (comparative cohort) clinical study, with ethical approval and patient consent.
Objective:
Confirmation of vertebral fracture union can pose significant challenges for clinicians in the management of spinal cord injury and in the decisions around patient mobilization. Bony union is usually assessed with computed tomography (CT). This study hypothesizes that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify vertebral bone union.
Setting:
A major spinal injuries unit in the United Kingdom.
Method:
Patients underwent CT and MRI at 12 weeks post-injury, if conservatively managed, or 12 weeks post-fixation. With CT as the gold standard, the MRI scans were reviewed blind to the CT result and indicators for fracture healing were compared.
Results:
A total of 35 patients with 55 fractures were imaged. Comparison of CT and MRI showed sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 100% and positive predictive value of 100% for fracture union imaged with MRI using CT as the gold standard.
Conclusion:
MRI correlates well with CT in identifying vertebral fracture union and non-union. We suggest that where imaging is indicated in the assessment of vertebral body fracture healing MRI can be used routinely with CT reserved for problematic or inconclusive cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Pilitsis JG, Lucas DR, Rengachary SS . Bone healing and spinal fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2002; 13: e1.
Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Magid D, Scott Jr WW, Brooker AF, Siegelman SS . Fracture nonunion: CT assessment with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 1988; 167: 483–488.
Haidekker MA, Andresen R, Werner HJ . Relationship between structural parameters, bone mineral density and fracture load in lumbar vertebrae, based on high-resolution computed tomography, quantitative computed tomography and compression tests. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9: 433–440.
Wehrli FW, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC . Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 731–764.
Majumdar S . Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 13: 323–334.
Link TM, Vieth V, Stehling C, Lotter A, Beer A, Newitt D et al. High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 663–671.
McNally EG, Goodman R, Burge P . The role of MRI in the assessment of scaphoid fracture healing: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1926–1928.
La Hei N, McFadyen I, Brock M, Field J . Scaphoid bone bruising—probably not the precursor of asymptomatic non-union of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32: 337–340.
Ingari JV, Smith DK, Aufdemorte TB, Yaszemski MJ . Anatomic significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 332: 209–214.
Laasonen EEM, Kyrö A, Korhola O, Böstman O . Magnetic resonance imaging of tibial shaft fracture repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108: 40–43.
Ganapathi M, Savage R, Jones AR . MRI assessment of the proximal pole of the scaphoid after internal fixation with a titanium alloy Herbert screw. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26: 326–329.
Singh AK, Davis TR, Dawson JS, Oni JA, Downing ND . Gadolinium enhanced MR assessment of proximal fragment vascularity in nonunions after scaphoid fracture: does it predict the outcome of reconstructive surgery? J Hand Surg [Br] 2004; 29: 444–448.
Sung MS, Park SH, Lee JM, Jung HJ, Yim JI, Kim YS et al. Sequential changes of traumatic vertebral compression fracture on MR imaging. J Korean Med Sci 1995; 10: 189–194.
Shih TT, Chen PQ, Li YW, Hsu CY . Spinal fractures and pseudoarthrosis complicating ankylosing spondylitis: MRI manifestation and clinical significance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 164–170.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the David Tolkein Research Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warwick, R., Willatt, J., Singhal, B. et al. Comparison of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging in fracture healing after spinal injury. Spinal Cord 47, 874–877 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.59
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.59
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Management of Distal Femoral Non-union: A Systematic Review
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2024)
-
Clinical Assessments of Fracture Healing and Basic Science Correlates: Is There Room for Convergence?
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2023)
-
Quantitative assessment of bone defect healing by multidetector CT in a pig model
Skeletal Radiology (2012)
