Abstract
Background:
Constipation and fecal incontinence are considerable problems for most individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Neurogenic bowel symptoms are caused by several factors including abnormal rectal wall properties. Stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) can inhibit bladder contractions and because of common innervation inhibitory effects are anticipated in the rectum too. Therefore, DNG could have a future role in the treatment of neurogenic fecal incontinence.
Aim:
To study the effect of acute DGN stimulation on the rectal cross sectional area (CSA) in SCI patients.
Methods:
Seven patients with complete supraconal SCI (median age 50 years) were included. Stimulation was applied via plaster-electrodes using an amplitude of twice the genito–anal reflex threshold (pulse width: 200 μs; pulse rate: 20 Hz). A pressure controlled phasic (10, 20 and 30 cmH2O) rectal distension protocol was repeated four times with subjects randomized to stimulation during 1st and 3rd distension series or 2nd and 4th distension series. The rectal CSA and pressure were measured using impedance planimetry and manometry.
Results:
All patients completed the investigation. Median stimulation amplitude was 51 mA (range 30–64). CSA was smaller during stimulation and differences reached statistical significance at distension pressures of 20 cmH2O (average decrease 9%; P=0.02) and 30 cmH2O (average decrease 4%; P=0.03) above resting rectal pressure. Accordingly, rectal pressure-CSA relation was significantly reduced during stimulation at 20 (P=0.03) and 30 cmH2O distension (P=0.02).
Conclusion:
DGN Stimulation in patients with supraconal SCI results in an acute decrease of rectal CSA and the rectal pressure-CSA relation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Glickman S, Kamm MA . Bowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients. Lancet 1996; 347: 1651–1653.
Liu CW, Huang CC, Chen CH, Yang YH, Chen TW, Huang MH . Prediction of severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 554–559.
Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Finnerup N, Laurberg S, Krogh K . The pattern of colorectal dysfunction changes with time since spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 234–238.
Krogh K, Mosdal C, Gregersen H, Laurberg S . Rectal wall properties in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 641–649.
Sun WM, MacDonagh R, Forster D, Thomas DG, Smallwood R, Read NW . Anorectal function in patients with complete spinal transection before and after sacral posterior rhizotomy. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 990–998.
Storrie JB, Harding S, Raeburn AJ, Trivedi PM, Preziosi G, Emmanuel AV . Medium-term outcome with transanal irrigation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction is related to rectal compliance. Gut 2009; 58: A87.
Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hultling C, Krogh K et al. A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord-injured patients. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 738–747.
Furlan JC, Urbach DR, Fehlings MG . Optimal treatment for severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction after chronic spinal cord injury: a decision analysis. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1139–1150.
Hansen J, Media S, Nohr M, Biering-Sorensen F, Sinkjaer T, Rijkhoff NJ . Treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injured patients by conditional electrical stimulation. J Urol 2005; 173: 2035–2039.
Chung EAL, Woodhouse JB, Balasubramaniam V, Emmanuel AV, Craggs MD . Does sacral afferent stimulation influence bowel compliance? Neurourol Urodyn 2005; 24: 498–499.
Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, Laurberg S . Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 625–631.
Madoff RD, Orrom WJ, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM . Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990; 5: 37–40.
Gregersen H, Djurhuus JC . Impedance planimetry: a new approach to biomechanical intestinal wall properties. Dig Dis 1991; 9: 332–340.
Hammer HF, Phillips SF, Camilleri M, Hanson RB . Rectal tone, distensibility, and perception: reproducibility and response to different distensions. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: G584–G590.
Oettle GJ, Heaton KW . ‘Rectal dissatisfaction’ in the irritable bowel syndrome. A manometric and radiological study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986; 1: 183–185.
Sorensen M, Rasmussen OO, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J . Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1106–1108.
Suttor VP, Ng C, Rutkowski S, Hansen RD, Kellow JE, Malcolm A . Colorectal responses to distension and feeding in patients with spinal cord injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2009; 296: G1344–G1349.
Krogh K, Ryhammer AM, Lundby L, Gregersen H, Laurberg TS . Comparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 199–206.
Andersen IS, Michelsen HB, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S . Impedance Planimetric Description of Normal Rectoanal Motility in Humans. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1840–1848.
Schurch B, Reilly I, Reitz A, Curt A . Electrophysiological recordings during the peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) test in complete spinal cord injury patients. World J Urol 2003; 20: 319–322.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worsøe, J., Fynne, L., Laurberg, S. et al. Acute effect of electrical stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve on rectal capacity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 50, 462–466 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.159
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.159
