Abstract
Study Design:
Comparison of diagnostic tests; methodological validation.
Objectives:
Primary: to investigate the precision and reliability of a knee bone mineral density (BMD) assessment protocol that uses an existing dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) forearm acquisition algorithm in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary: to correlate DXA-based knee areal BMD with volumetric BMD assessments derived from quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
Setting:
Academic medical center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Methods:
Participants: a convenience sample of 12 individuals with acute SCI recruited for an observational study of bone loss and 34 individuals with chronic SCI who were screened for a longitudinal study evaluating interventions to increase BMD. Main outcome measures: root-mean-square standard deviation (RMS-SD) and intra/inter-rater reliability of areal BMD acquired at three knee regions using an existing DXA forearm acquisition algorithm; correlation of DXA-based areal BMD with QCT-derived volumetric BMD.
Results:
The RMS-SD of areal BMD at the distal femoral epiphysis, distal femoral metaphysis and proximal tibial epiphysis averaged 0.021, 0.012 and 0.016 g cm−2, respectively, in acute SCI and 0.018, 0.02 and 0.016 g cm−2 in chronic SCI. All estimates of intra/inter-rater reliability exceeded 97% and DXA-based areal BMD was significantly correlated with QCT-derived volumetric BMD at all knee regions analyzed.
Conclusions:
Existing DXA forearm acquisition algorithms are sufficiently precise and reliable for short-term assessments of knee BMD in individuals with SCI. Future work is necessary to quantify the reliability of this approach in longitudinal investigations and to determine its ability to predict fractures and recovery potential.
Sponsorship:
This work was funded by the Department of Defense, grant number DOD W81XWH-10-1-0951, with partial support from Merck & Co, Inc.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Dudley-Javoroski S, Shields RK . Regional cortical and trabecular bone loss after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012; 49: 1365–1376.
Battaglino RA, Lazzari AA, Garshick E, Morse LR . Spinal cord injury-induced osteoporosis: pathogenesis and emerging therapies. Curr Osteoporosis Rep 2012; 10: 278–285.
Edwards WB, Schnitzer TJ, Troy KL, Edwards WB, Schnitzer TJ, Troy KL . Bone mineral and stiffness loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in acute spinal cord injury. Osteoporos Int 2013; 25: 1005–1015.
Edwards WB, Schnitzer TJ, Troy KL . Bone mineral loss at the proximal femur in acute spinal cord injury. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2461–2469.
Zehnder Y, Luthi M, Michel D, Knecht H, Perrelet R, Neto I et al. Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 180–189.
Fattal C, Mariano-Goulart D, Thomas E, Rouays-Mabit H, Verollet C, Maimoun L . Osteoporosis in persons with spinal cord injury: the need for a targeted therapeutic education. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 59–67.
Biering-Sorensen F, Bohr HH, Schaadt OP . Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury. Eur J Clin Invest 1990; 20: 330–335.
Leslie WD, Nance PW . Dissociated hip and spine demineralization: a specific finding in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 960–964.
Ragnarsson KT, Sell GH . Lower extremity fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981; 62: 418–423.
Comarr AE, Hutchinson RH, Bors E . Extremity fractures of patients with spinal cord injuries. Am J Surg 1962; 103: 732–739.
Gaspar AP, Lazaretti-Castro M, Brandao CM . Bone mineral density in spinal cord injury: an evaluation of the distal femur. J Osteoporos 2012; 2012: 519754.
Garland DE, Adkins RH, Kushwaha V, Stewart C . Risk factors for osteoporosis at the knee in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med 2004; 27: 202–206.
Shields RK, Schlechte J, Dudley-Javoroski S, Zwart BD, Clark SD, Grant SA et al. Bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: a reliable method for knee measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1969–1973.
Morse LR, Lazzari AA, Battaglino R, Stolzmann KL, Matthess KR, Gagnon DR et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the distal femur may be more reliable than the proximal tibia in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 827–831.
Bakkum AJ, Janssen TW, Rolf MP, Roos JC, Burcksen J, Knol DL et al. A reliable method for measuring proximal tibia and distal femur bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Med Engin Phys 2013; 36: 387–390.
Baim S, Wilson CR, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, Downs RW, Lentle BC . Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 2005; 8: 371–378.
Lodder MC, Lems WF, Ader HJ, Marthinsen AE, van Coeverden SC, Lips P et al. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheumat Dis 2004; 63: 285–289.
Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C . Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1449–1456.
Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L . Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 3rd edn. Mahwah, New Jersey, : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2003.
Fan B, Lewiecki EM, Sherman M, Lu Y, Miller PD, Genant HK et al. Improved precision with Hologic Apex software. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 1597–1602.
Acknowledgements
We thank Julia A Marks and Narina V Simonian for assistance with participant recruitment and data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McPherson, J., Edwards, W., Prasad, A. et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee in spinal cord injury: methodology and correlation with quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord 52, 821–825 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.122
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.122
This article is cited by
-
Functional electrical stimulation (FES)–assisted rowing combined with zoledronic acid, but not alone, preserves distal femur strength and stiffness in people with chronic spinal cord injury
Osteoporosis International (2021)
-
Stiffness and Strength Predictions From Finite Element Models of the Knee are Associated with Lower-Limb Fractures After Spinal Cord Injury
Annals of Biomedical Engineering (2021)
-
Bone Loss and the Current Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Risk of Fragility Fracture in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports (2020)
-
Osteoporosis in Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury: an Overview of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatments
Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism (2019)
-
Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee and heel: methodology and implications for research to reduce bone mineral loss after spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2017)
