Abstract
Study design:
Systematic Review.
Objectives:
To investigate the effect of interventions enhancing (re)employment following spinal cord injury (SCI).
Setting:
Studies from multiple countries were included.
Methods:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, PsycINFO and SPORTDISCUS databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) describing a hospital- or a community-based intervention aiming at employment in a SCI population were selected. Quality appraisal was done using the SIGN methodology, and the quality of evidence was graded using the Grade approach. Data extraction was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook. Employment rate and duration were primary outcomes.
Results:
Only one RCT, including 201 patients describing an intervention over 1 and 2 years, was of sufficient quality. In this study, the employment rate was 26% after 1 and 31% after 2 years for competitive work, compared with 10% in the treatment as usual-intervention site (TAU-IS) control group and 2% in the treatment as usual observational site (TAU-OS) after 1 and 2 years. Other studies were of low quality and describe higher employment rates from 36 to 100%.
Conclusions:
Only one RCT was of sufficient quality and showed evidence that a vocational rehabilitation programme based on the principles of supported employment integrated in a multidisciplinary team enhances employment for SCI people. As the vast majority of studies included in this review are of low methodological quality, further research is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
World Health Organisation (WHO). International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. ICF: Geneva. 2001.
Guttman L . Statistical survey on 1000 paraplegic and initial treatment of traumatic paraplegia. Proc R Soc Med 1954; 47: 1099–1113.
Guttman L . Our paralyzed fellowmen at work. Rehabilitation 1962; 63: 586–589.
Krause JS . Adjustment to life after spinal cord injury: a comparison among three participant groups on employment status. Rehabil Couns Bull 1992; 35: 218–229.
Krause JS, Saunders LL, Acuna J . Gainful employment and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: effects beyond that of demographic, injury and socioeconomic factors. Spinal Cord 2012; 50: 784–788.
De Vivo MJ . Causes and costs of spinal cord injury in the United States. Spinal Cord 2013; 35: 809–813.
Mackinley W . Assistive technology and computer adaptations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Neuro Rehabil 2004; 19: 141–146.
Young AE, Murphy GC . Employment status after spinal cord injury (1992-2005): a review with implications for interpretation, evaluation, further research, and clinical practice. Int J Rehabil Res 2009; 32: 1–11.
Ottomanelli L, Lind L . Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med 2009; 32: 503–531.
Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sorensen F . Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1341–1375.
Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH . Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology 2002; 11: 124–131.
Bell SM . The effects of government disability benefits, accessability laws and rehabilitation on employment choices by individuals with spinal cord injuries. ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU. Paper AAI3076642. Available from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI30766422002.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Avalaible from http://www.sign.ac.uk/.
Higgins JPT, Green S . Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0.2011. Available from http://www.cochrane.org/handbook.
Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Suris A, McGeough C, Sinnott PL, Toscano R et al. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries: results from a randomized multisite study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 740–747.
Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL . Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 784–790.
Blackwell TL, Millington MJ, Guglielmo DE . Vocational aspects of life care planning for people with spinal cord injury. Work 1999; 13: 13–19.
Glassel A, Rauch A, Selb M, Emmenegger K, Luckenkemper M, Escorpizo R . A case study on the application of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based tools for vocational rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. Work 2012; 41: 465–474.
Inge KJ, Wehman P . Vocational Rehabilitation for persons with Spinal Cord Injuries and other severe Physical Disabilities. Am Rehabil 1996; 22: 2–13.
Inge KJ, Wehman P, Strobel W, Powell D, Todd J . Supported employment and assistive technology for persons with spinal cord injury:three illustrations of succesful work supports. J Vocational Rehabil 1998; 10: 141–152.
Targett PS, Wehman P, McKinley WO, Young C . Succesful work supports for persons with SCI: Focus on job retention. J Vocational Rehbail 2004; 21: 19–26.
Targett P, Wehman P, Young C . Return to work for persons with spinal cord injury: designing work supports. Neuro Rehabil 2004; 19: 131–139.
DeSouza M, Sycamore M, Little S, Kirker SG . The Papworth Early Rehabilitation Programme: vocational outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 671–677.
Geisler WO, Jousse AT, Wynne-Jones M . Vocational re-establishment of patients with spinal cord injury. Med Serv J Can 1966; 22: 698–710.
Hansen Holm C, Mahmud I, Bhuiyan Jahan A . Vocational reintegration of people with spinal cord lesion in Bangladesh-an observational study based on a vocational training project at CRP. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007; 18: 63–75.
King T, Emery R, Warron S, Landis T . A collaboraitive approach to returning clients to work during the first year after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2004; 9: 33–42.
Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Wright J, Shem K, Medel R, Duong T . An effective community-based mentoring program for return to work and school after brain and spinal cord injury. Neuro Rehabil 2012; 31: 63–73.
Phillips VL, Hunsaker AE, Florence CS . Return to work and productive activities following a spinal cord injury: the role of income and insurance. Spinal Cord 2012; 50: 623–626.
Jellinek HM, Harvey RF . Vocational/educational services in a medical rehabilitation facility: outcomes in spinal cord and brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 87–88.
Trenaman LM, Miller WC, Escorpizo R, the SCIRE Research Team. Interventions for improving employment outcomes among individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2014; 52: 788–794.
Allen K, Blascovich J . The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial JAMA 1996; 275: 1001–1006.
Jongbloed L, Backman C, Forwell SJ, Carpenter C . Employment after spinal cord injury: the impact of government policies in Canada. Work 2007; 29: 145–154.
Jang Y, Wang YH, Wang JD . Return to work after spinal cord injury in Taiwan: the contribution of functional independence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 681–686.
Marini I, Lee GK, Chan F, Chapin MH, Romero MG . Vocational rehabilitation service patterns related to succesful competitive employments outcomes of persons with spinal cord injury. J Vocational Rehabil 2008; 28: 1–13.
Wang RY, Yang YR, Yen LL, Lieu FK . Functional ability, perceived exertion and employment of the individuals with spinal cord lesion in Taiwan. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 69–76.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the intellectual contribution of Prof Peter Donceel, PhD, Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Department of Public Health, KU Leuven, Belgium. Furthermore, special thanks to Dr Victoria Phillips and Dr Lisa Ottomanelli for providing further information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roels, E., Aertgeerts, B., Ramaekers, D. et al. Hospital- and community-based interventions enhancing (re)employment for people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 54, 2–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.133
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.133
This article is cited by
-
Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
Pilot and Feasibility Studies (2021)
-
Measurement Properties of the Full and Brief Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire in Persons with Physical Disabilities
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (2021)
-
Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (2021)
-
Return to work after spinal cord injury: a Singaporean pilot community-based rehabilitation program
Spinal Cord (2020)
-
Employment After Spinal Cord Injury
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports (2020)
