Abstract
Study design:
Cross-sectional study.
Objectives:
To establish whether inter-professional rehabilitation goals from people with non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can be classified against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) SCI Comprehensive and Brief Core Sets early postacute situation.
Setting:
Neurological rehabilitation unit.
Methods:
Rehabilitation goals of 119 patients with mainly incomplete and non-traumatic SCIs were classified against the ICF SCI Core Sets following established linking rules.
Results:
A total of 119 patients generated 1509 goals with a mean (and s.d.) of 10.5 (9.1) goals per patient during the course of their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Classifying the 1509 rehabilitation goals against the Comprehensive ICF Core Set generated 2909 ICF codes. Only 69 goals (4.6%) were classified as ‘not definable (ND)’. Classifying the 1509 goals against the Brief ICF Core Set generated 2076 ICF codes. However, 751(49.8%) of these goals were classified as ‘ND’. In the majority of goals (95.7%), the ICF code description was not comprehensive enough to fully express the goals set in rehabilitation. In particular, the notion of quality of movement or specificity and measurability aspects of a goal (usually described with the criteria and acronyms SMART) could not be expressed through the ICF codes.
Conclusion:
Inter-professional rehabilitation goals can be broadly described by the ICF Comprehensive Core Set for SCI but not the Brief Core Set.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL . Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 427–433.
Chang F-H, Wang Y-H, Jang Y, Wang C-W . Factors associated with quality of life among people with spinal cord injury: application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 2264–2270.
World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland. 2001.
Kostanjsek N . Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: S3.
Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Bedirhan T . Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 281–282.
Kirchberger I, Cieza A, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW et al. ICF core sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the early post-acute context. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 297–304.
Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 305–312.
Herrmann KH, Kirchberger I, Stucki G, Cieza A . The Comprehensive ICF core sets for spinal cord injury from the perspective of physical therapists: a worldwide validation study using the Delphi technique. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 502–514.
Herrmann KH, Kirchberger I, Stucki G, Cieza A . The comprehensive ICF core sets for spinal cord injury from the perspective of occupational therapists: a worldwide validation study using the Delphi technique. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 600–613.
Chen H-C, Yen T-H, Chang K-H, Lin Y-N, Wang Y-H, Liou T-H et al. Developing an ICF core set for sub-acute stages of spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a preliminary study. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37: 51–55.
Wade DT . Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 291–295.
Levack WMM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM, Weatherall M . Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 739–755.
Barnard Ra, Cruice MN, Playford ED . Strategies used in the pursuit of achievability during goal setting in rehabilitation. Qual Health Res 2010; 20: 239–250.
Bovend’Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade DT . Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 352–361.
Lohmann S, Decker J, Müller M, Strobl R, Grill E . The ICF forms a useful framework for classifying individual patient goals in post-acute rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 151–155.
Huber EO, Tobler A, Gloor-Juzi T, Grill E, Gubler-Gut B . The ICF as a way to specify goals and to assess the outcome of physiotherapeutic interventions in the acute hospital. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 174–177.
Wallace MA, Kendall MB . Transitional rehabilitation goals for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 642–650.
Freeman Ja, Hobart JC, Playford ED, Undy B, Thompson AJ . Evaluating neurorehabilitation: lessons from routine data collection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 723–728.
Schut HA, Stam HJ . Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 223–226.
Holliday RC, Cano S, Freeman JA, Playford ED . Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 576–580.
Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G . ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212–218.
Mittrach R, Grill E, Walchner-Bonjean M, Scheuringer M, Boldt C, Huber EO et al. Goals of physiotherapy interventions can be described using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Physiotherapy 2008; 94: 150–157.
Ballert C, Oberhauser C, Biering-Sørensen F, Stucki G, Cieza A . Explanatory power does not equal clinical importance: study of the use of the Brief ICF Core Sets for spinal cord injury with a purely statistical approach. Spinal Cord 2012; 50: 734–739.
Byrnes M, Beilby J, Ray P, McLennan R, Ker J, Schug S . Patient-focused goal planning process and outcome after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: quantitative and qualitative audit. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26: 1141–1149.
Hosseini SM, Oyster ML, Kirby RL, Harrington AL, Boninger ML . Manual wheelchair skills capacity predicts quality of life and community integration in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 2237–2243.
Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JTC, Wolfe DL . The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29: 1548–1555.
Hammell KW . Quality of life among people with high spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 607–620.
Van der Putten J, Stevenson V, Playford E, Thompson A . Factors affecting functional outcome in patients with nontraumatic spinal cord lesions after inpatient rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001, 99–104.
Acknowledgements
Dr Diane Playford was supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haas, B., Playford, E., Ahmad, A. et al. Rehabilitation goals of people with spinal cord injuries can be classified against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 54, 324–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.155
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.155
