Table 5 Summary of technical validation results

From: VenomKB, a new knowledge base for facilitating the validation of putative venom therapies

Algorithm Name

Number of records

Recall (PMID-sensitive)

Recall (PMIDs disregarded)

Precision

VExtractor

35,240

76%

89%

82%

SemanticVExtractor

7,208

66%

84%

80%

  1. Percent recall rates of the ‘VExtractor’ and ‘SemanticVExtractor’ algorithms as compared to the gold standard (manually reviewed venoms), using 100 randomly selected records from the ‘Manually Reviewed Venoms’ table. Reported precision was computed after manually pruning obvious false positives.
Back to article page