Table 5 Spatial comparison (mean±SE) of regression model.

From: A high-resolution streamflow and hydrological metrics dataset for ecological modeling using a regression model

 

RMSE (m3 s−1)

nRMSE (%)

R2

% of significance

Training (70%)

   

Training vs. testing

LMWW

154.21±0.55

6.89±0.02

0.83±0.0005

4.70%

lmRob

152.77±0.54

6.82±0.01

0.83±0.0005

 

Testing (30%)

   

LMWW vs. lmRob

LMWW

151.61±0.58

7.35±0.02

0.82±0.0009

0%

lmRob

150.33±0.58

7.29±0.02

0.82±0.0009

 
  1. Training and testing data (70:30) and between model methods LMWW & lmRob; Wilcoxon test percentage of significance (%) of p < 0.05 concluding that the means are not significantly different (i.e. observed and predicted values are similar).
Back to article page