Key Points
-
Evaluates the competency profile of current registrants on the OS specialist list.
-
Evaluates the education and training backgrounds of members of the OS specialist list.
-
Identifies the practice of extended competencies by members of the OS specialist list with widely varying levels of education and experience.
-
Historically contextualises the creation of the OS specialist list.
Abstract
Aims This study surveyed members of the Oral Surgery (OS) register and requested a self assessment of their surgical competencies with regard to both core and extended procedures, as defined by the OS curriculum. Details of education, training backgrounds and working patterns were also requested. Methods Members of the OS register were identified on the General Dental Council website and mailed a questionnaire. Replies were anonymous. Results Three hundred and seventy-three valid replies were received. Seventy-five percent of respondents were on the OS specialist list only (single registrants) and 25% of respondents were on both the OS and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialist lists (dual-registrants). Sixty-two percent of single registrants did not feel comfortable performing all core procedures compared to 13% of dual-registrants. Fifty-one percent of OS single registrants felt comfortable performing some extended procedures, as did 99% of dual-registrants. Fifty percent of single registrants and 100% of dual-registrants had a higher qualification. Thirty-seven percent of single registrants had undergone some formally-approved registrar-level training; 98% of dual-registrants had done likewise. Twenty-one percent of single registrants practised exclusively in the private sector compared to 8% of dual-registrants. Conclusion Extended competencies are being practised by members of the OS register with wide-ranging educational and training backgrounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Obituary: Rupert Sutton Taylor. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 24: 384–386.
Peiffer R. The development of the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery in the European Union. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996; 24: 193–194.
Standing Dental Advisory Committee (SDAC) report. A Review of the Dentally Based Specialties and Specialist Lists. November 2004 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4096053?ssSourceSiteId=ab.
Specialist Lists Review Group: Final Report. Paragraph 14b. Item 14B Council. 7 December 2005 – available from http://www.gdc-uk.org/.
Specialist Lists Review Group: Final Report. Paragraph 12c. Item 14B Council. 7 December 2005 – available from http://www.gdc-uk.org/.
Association of British Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Response to the GDC Specialist List Review Group on the 'Consultation on amendments/additions to the existing Specialist List'. www.abaoms.org.uk/docs/response-gdc-specialist-lists.doc.
Guidelines for Oral Surgery Training Programmes – available via the Royal College of Surgeons of England website section entitled, 'Higher Specialist Training Documents': http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/training/documents.html#general.
PMETB report on training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery April 2008 http://www.pmetb.org.uk/fileadmin/user/Communications/Closed_consultations/OFMS_Report.pdf.
Syllabus for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2009 – available from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project (ISCP) website: https://www.iscp.ac.uk/Syllabus/Overview.aspx?Spec=OMF2.
From the General Dental Council (GDC) website: http://www.gdc-uk.net/searchregister.
Langdon J D. Training for oral and maxillofacial surgery, academic oral surgery, and surgical dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 1803–1806.
Slee R. The changing face of oral and maxillofacial surgeons? Letter Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32: 340–341.
Goss A N, Gerke D C . Effects of training on the scope of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19: 184–189.
Guly C, Sidebottom R, Hakin K, Bates K . Challenges of private provision in the NHS: treatment centres and their effect on surgical training. Br Med J 2005; 3 31: 1338.
Sachdeva A K . Acquisition and maintenance of surgical competence. Semin Vasc Surg 2002; 15: 182–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Messiha, A., Chadha, A., Al-Hadad, I. et al. A survey of self-assessed surgical competencies with respect to qualifications, training and working patterns of members on the oral surgery register. Br Dent J 208, 65–69 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.52
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.52
This article is cited by
-
Helpful and timely
British Dental Journal (2010)
