Key Points
-
Assesses clinical decision-making for restorative dental situations among a group of general dental practitioners attending a postgraduate course.
-
Highlights the persistence of some outdated treatment modalities.
-
Demonstrates the inconsistent uptake of contemporary treatment philosophies
-
Offers a method of informing educational providers of useful subjects for postgraduate courses.
Abstract
Continuing professional development (CPD) courses seek to inform, educate and develop practitioners' patterns of prescribing in line with the evidence base. When devising such courses it would be useful for organisers to have some idea of what current practice is and the decision-making process as this would inform the development of appropriate continuing education courses. A questionnaire comprising ten questions was given to 90 dentists at the start of a day's lecture course run under Section 63 regulations. The dentists were then shown a series of pictures and asked how they would manage each of the cases presented. Eighty-nine dentists completed the questionnaire and the results were tabulated and fed back to the group at the end of their day's course. Results showed varied and inconsistent application of advances in restorative techniques among the respondents. Despite a definite interest in more modern treatment options, many practitioners continued to support the use of traditional techniques that could be considered outdated. Further investigation of the practices of GDPs and their decision-making processes would be useful in targeting postgraduate education programmes to encourage the uptake of evidence-based practice.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Firmstone V R, Bullock A D, Fielding A et al. The impact of course attendance on the practice of dentists. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 773–777.
John V, Parashos P . Factors involved in the translation of continuing professional development programmes into clinical practice among Victorian dentists. Aust Dent J 2007; 52: 305–314.
Eckerbom M, Magnusson T . Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 245–249.
Naumann M, Kiessling S, Seemann R . Treatment concepts for restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a nationwide survey of dentists in Germany. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 332–338.
Brunton P A, Christensen G J, Cheung S W, Burke F J, Wilson N H . Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics. Br Dent J 2005; 198: 99–103, discussion 89.
Wilson N H, Christensen G J, Cheung S W, Burke F J, Brunton P A . Contemporary dental practice in the UK: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching. Br Dent J 2004; 197: 753–756, discussion 747.
Seow L L, Toh C G, Wilson N H . A survey of current practices among general dental practitioners in Manchester in 2002. Prim Dent Care 2003; 10: 87–92.
Annusavice K. Clinical decision making and cost effectiveness: impact on treatment choices. In: Quality evaluation of dental restorations: criteria for placement and replacement. pp 389–397. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989.
Maryniuk G, Schweitzer S, Braun R . Replacement of amalgams with crowns: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 263–267.
Annusavice K. Treatment regimens in preventive and restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 727–743.
Burke F J. From extension for prevention to prevention of extension: (minimal intervention dentistry). Dent Update 2003; 30: 492–498, 500, 502.
Elderton R. Assessment and clinical management of early caries in young adults: invasive versus non-invasive methods. Br Dent J 1985; 158: 440–444.
Moncada G, Fernández E, MartÃn J et al. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 258–264.
Burke F J T, Cheung W, Mjor I, Wilson F . Restoration longevity and the analysis of reasons for the placement and the replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the UK. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 234–242.
Murray P E, Hafez A A, Smith A J, Cox C F . Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 470–478.
Barnardo M, Luis H, Martin M D et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomised clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775–783.
Pameijer C H, Stallard R E . Effect of self-threading pins. J Am Dent Assoc 1972; 85: 895–898.
Dilts W E, Welk D A, Laswell H R, George L . Crazing of tooth structure associated with placement of pins for amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1970; 81: 387–390.
Lucarotti K, Holder L, Burke F J T . Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent 2005; 33: 805–815.
Cipriano T M, Santos J F . Clinical behaviour of repaired amalgam restorations: a two-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 8–11.
Kolker J L, Damiano P C, Caplan D J et al. Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns: factors affecting the receipt of subsequent treatment after 10 years. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 738–748, quiz 805–806.
Scurria M S, Shugars D A, Hayden W J, Felton D A. General dentists' pattern of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 775–779.
Bader J D, Shugars D A . Understanding dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1992; 52: 102–110.
Van Nieuwenhuysen J P, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V . Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003; 60: 325–329.
Djemal S, Setchell D, King P, Wickens J . Long-term survival characteristics of 832 resin-retained bridges and splints provided in a post-graduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 302-320.
Cohen B I, Mark K, Pagnillo M K et al. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 458–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maidment, Y., Durey, K. & Ibbetson, R. Decisions about restorative dental treatment among dentists attending a postgraduate continuing professional development course. Br Dent J 209, 455–459 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.979
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.979
