Key Points
-
Suggests that halitosis is one of the most unattractive aspects of social interactions.
-
Demonstrates how social distance determines whether or not a person is informed about his or her bad breath.
-
Points to the potential damaging effects of persistent halitosis on social interactions and relationships.
Abstract
Objective To derive an estimate of encounters with halitosis and to assess the impact of halitosis on their psychosocial interactions with halitosis patients.
Methods Participants were 1,006 members of an online panel, being representative of the population of the Netherlands with regard to gender, age, family situation, education level and labour participation. They were invited to participate in a survey using an online questionnaire with four questions on becoming faced with people having halitosis.
Results Almost 90% of the participants indicated being faced with a person having halitosis regularly, 40% at least once a week, and men significantly more frequently than women. Halitosis was reported to be a strong 'downer' when meeting a person for the first time. Whether one would draw a person's attention to his breath malodour proved to be related to the kind of person involved and appeared to decrease with the increase of the social distance to the person. Drawing a person's attention to his breath malodour would virtually always be performed personally.
Conclusion Halitosis is considered to be one of the most unattractive aspects of social interactions and has potentially damaging effects on psychosocial interactions and relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
van den Broek A M W T, Feenstra L, de Baat C . A review of the current literature on aetiology and measurement methods of halitosis. J Dent 2007; 35: 627–635.
Hughes F J, McNab R . Oral malodour – a review. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 (Suppl. 1): S1–S7.
Scully C, Greenman J . Halitosis (breath odour). Periodontology 2000 2008; 48: 66–75.
Armstrong B L, Sensat M L, Stoltenberg J L . Halitosis: a review of current literature. J Dent Hyg 2010; 84: 65–74.
Scully C, Greenman J . Halitology (breath odour: aetiopathogenesis and management). Oral Dis 2012; 18: 333–345.
Bosy A . Oral malodour: philosophical and practical aspects. J Can Dent Assoc 1997; 63: 196–201.
Oho T, Yoshida Y, Shimazaki Y, Yamashita Y, Koga T . Psychological condition of patients complaining of halitosis. J Dent 2001; 29: 31–33.
Quirynen M, Avontroodt P, Soers C, Zhao H, Pauwels M, Van Steenberghe D . Impact of tongue cleansers on microbial load and taste. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 506–510.
Suzuki N, Yoneda M, Naito T, Iwamoto T, Hirofuji T . Relationship between halitosis and psychological status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 542–547.
Nardi G M, Forabosco A, Forabosco G, Musciotto A, Campisi G, Grandi T . Halitosis: a stomatological and psychological issue. Minerva Stomatol 2009; 58: 435–444.
Suzuki N, Yoneda M, Naito T et al. Association between oral malodour and psychological characteristics in subjects with neurotic tendencies complaining of halitosis. Int Dent J 2011; 61: 57–62.
Falcão D P, Vieira C N, De Amorim R F B . Breaking paradigmas: a new definition for halitosis in the context of pseudo-halitosis and halitophobia. J Breath Res 2012; 6: 017105.
Zaitsu T, Ueno M, Shinada K, Wright F A, Kawaguchi Y . Social anxiety disorder in genuine halitosis patients. Health Qual Life Outcome 2011; 9: 94.
Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS): Population statistics 2011 (in Dutch). (Cited December 6: 2012); Available at: URL: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb.
Doty R L, Appelbaum S, Zusho H, Settle R G . Sex differences in odour identification ability: a cross-cultural analysis. Neuropsychologia 1985; 23: 667–672.
Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. Normative data for the “Sniffin Sticks” including tests of odour identification, odour discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 237–243.
Aneshensel C S, Frerichs R R, Clark V A, Yokopenic P A . Measuring depression in the community: A comparison of telephone and personal interviews. Public Opin Quart 1982; 46: 110–121.
Wysocki C J, Gilbert A N . National Geographic Smell Survey: effects of age are heterogenous. Ann NY Acad Sci 1989; 561: 12–28.
Takahashi L K, Nakashima B R, Hong H, Watanabe K . The smell of danger: a behavioural and neural analysis of predator odour-induced fear. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005; 29: 1157–1167.
Kissinger P, Rice J, Farley T et al. Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behaviour research. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 950–954.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by MedaPharma BV Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Jongh, A., van Wijk, A., Horstman, M. et al. Attitudes towards individuals with halitosis: an online cross sectional survey of the Dutch general population. Br Dent J 216, E8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.101
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.101
This article is cited by
-
Self-perceived halitosis influences social interactions
BMC Oral Health (2016)
-
Diagnosis, Prevalence, and Treatment of Halitosis
Current Oral Health Reports (2014)
