Key Points
-
Provides a composite measurement of oral health status.
-
Suggests the online audit facility in DEPPA allows the average oral health status to be reported to dental teams periodically so that they can benchmark their outcomes against the average.
-
These audits can help to inform required staffing levels, the balance of skills needed in the team, and the oral health policy for a practice.
Abstract
Aim To compare the outcomes of a contemporary oral health status (OHS) scoring system with national oral health data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey, and to explore the utility of the OHS in audit and service development.
Methods An OHS scoring system was developed as part of a previously reported comprehensive on-line patient assessment tool. The assessment tool also measured future disease risk and indicative capitation fee grading. The modified OHS score component was developed over 20 years of research and experience from the original Oral Health Index (Burke and Wilson 1995). The online tool was piloted by 25 volunteer dentists on 640 recall patients and qualitative and quantitative feedback provided. Anonymised data from the inputs and scores generated were collected centrally and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results The modified OHS was reported to have good validity by the pilot group. Submitted data confirmed a mean age for the recall patients examined as 53 ± 15.8 years and an average oral health status score of 79.5 ± 10.8 where a score of 100 equates to perfect oral health. A breakdown of the scores into the eight principal components provided evidence of cross validation with the Adult Dental Health Survey (2009).
Conclusions Scoring oral health status electronically offers valuable opportunities for clinical audit. The reported benchmark oral health score of 79.5 for recall patients can be updated as increased numbers of patients enter the centralised data recording system. Audit can be facilitated by this move from a paper-based system to an on-line tool with central data collection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Harrington H J . The improvement Process. McGraw-Hill, 1987.
Department of Health. Choosing better oral health: an oral health plan for England. London: Dental and Ophthalmic Services Division, 2005.
Slade G D . Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 284–290.
The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. London: HSCIC, 2011.
Ireland R S, Jenner A M, Williams M J, Tickle M . A clinical minimum data set for general dental practice. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 663–667.
Burke F J T, Wilson N H . Measuring oral health: an historical view and details of a contemporary oral health index (OHX). Int Dent J 1995; 45: 358–337.
Burke F J T, Busby M, McHugh S, Delagy S, Mullins A, Matthews R . Evaluation of an oral health scoring system by dentists in general practice. Br Dent J 2003; 194: 214–218.
Burke F J T, Busby M, Mchugh S, Mullins A, Matthews R . A pilot study of patient's views of an oral health scoring system. Prim Dent Care 2004; 11: 37–39.
Delargy S, Busby M, McHugh S, Matthews R, Burke F J T . The reproducibility of the Denplan Oral Health Score (OHS) in general dental practitioners. Community Dental Health 2007; 24: 105–110.
Busby M, Matthews R, Chapple E, Chapple I . Novel online integrated oral health and risk assessment tool: development and practitioners' evaluation. Br Dent J 2013; 215: 115–120.
Beck J D, Koch G G, Offenbacher S . Incidence of attachment loss over 3 years in older adults – new and progressing lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23: 291–296.
Barnfather K, Cope G, Chapple I . Effect of incorporating a 10 minute point of care test for salivary nicotine metabolites into a general practice based smoking cessation programme: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Busby, M., Chapple, L., Matthews, R. et al. Continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit. Br Dent J 216, E20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.352
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.352
This article is cited by
-
Oral health and quality of life: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe
BMC Oral Health (2022)
-
Practitioner evaluation of an online oral health and risk assessment tool for young patients
British Dental Journal (2017)
-
The relationship between general health and lifestyle factors and oral health outcomes
British Dental Journal (2016)
-
The relationship between oral health risk and disease status and age, and the significance for general dental practice funding by capitation
British Dental Journal (2014)
-
Summary of: The relationship between oral health risk and disease status and age, and the significance for general dental practice funding by capitation
British Dental Journal (2014)
