Key Points
-
Discusses peer assisted learning (PAL), which involves students in the teaching of one or more fellow students, and is largely underused within dental education.
-
Shows that, provided it is carefully planned and implemented, it is beneficial in the teaching of simple dental clinical skills.
-
Suggests that PAL also seems to have a place in facilitating student engagement with graduate attributes.
Abstract
This study describes a pilot project in which peer assisted learning (PAL) is used to teach dental clinical skills. A cluster randomised controlled trial compared opinions of Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students from peer-led groups versus staff-led groups in a clinical (impression taking) and a pre-clinical (handpiece skills) task. BDS5 (peer tutors) in their final year delivered teaching to BDS1 (tutees) for each task. Quantitative data from tutees and the peer tutors was gathered from questionnaires, along with open written comments. PAL was well received by both tutees and peer tutors. BDS1 tutees rated BDS5 peer tutors highly for delivery of information, and level of feedback. The tutees considered peer tutors more approachable and less intimidating than staff. Peer tutors reported their own knowledge had increased as a result of teaching. In a summative OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) four months following the teaching, no statistical significant difference between the performance of peer-led and staff-led groups was found at stations related to the subject matter in question. It is argued that PAL, as well as being a useful method of delivering subject-specific teaching, is able to contribute to the development of graduate attributes.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Ten Cate O, Durning S . Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 2007; 29: 591–599.
Topping K J, Ehly S W . Peer Assisted Learning: A Framework for Consultation. J Educ Psychol Consult 2001; 12: 2113–2132.
Ten Cate O, Durning, S . Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in a medical curriculum. Med Teach 2007; 29: 546–552.
Perry M E, Burke J M, Friel L, Field M . Can training in musculoskeletal examination skills be effectively delivered by undergraduate students as part of the standard curriculum? Rheumatol 2010; 49: 1756–1761.
Graziano S C . Randomised surgical training for medical students: resident versus peer led training. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2011; 204: e1–4.
Yu T C, Wilson N C, Singh P P, Lemanu D P, Hawjen S J, Hill A G . Medical students-as teachers: systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract 2011; 2: 157–172.
Goldsmith M, Stewart L, Ferguson L . Peer learning partnership: an innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2006; 26: 123–130.
Baillie S, Shore H, Gill D, May S . Introducing peer assisted learning into a veterinary curriculum: a trial with a simulator. J Vet Med Educ 2009; 36: 174–179.
Bibb C A, Lefever K H . Mentoring future dental educators through an apprentice teaching experience. J Dent Educ 2002; 66: 703–709.
Brueckner J K, MacPherson B R . Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory. Eur J Dent Educ 2004; 8: 72–77.
Tantawi M, Abdelaziz H, Abdelraheem A, Mahrous A . Using peer assisted learning and role playing to teach generic skills to dental students: the health care simulation model. J Dent Educ 2014; 78: 85–97.
Bowden J, Hart G, King B, Trigwell K, Watts, O . Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. Australian Government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra, 2000.
Gunn V, Bell S, Kaufmann K . Thinking strategically about employability and graduate attributes: Universities and enhancing learning for beyond university. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (Scotland). Glasgow, 2010.
Barrie S C . A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Educ Res Dev 2004; 23: 261–275.
General Dental Council. Preparing for practice: dental team learning outcomes for registration. London, 2011.
Lalumandier J A, Victoroff K Z, Thuernagle O . Early clinical experience for the first year dental students. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 1090–1095.
Ross M T, Cameron H S . Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no 30. Med Teach 2007; 29: 527–545.
Lincoln M A, McAllister L L . Peer learning in clinical education. Med Teach 1993; 15: 17–25.
Field M, Burke J M, McAllister D, Lloyd D M . Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ 2007; 41: 411–418.
University of Glasgow. Graduate attributes matrix. Available online at http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_183776_en.pdf (accessed September 2015).
Moon J A . Experiential learning and reflective learning: drawing in together. In Moon J A (ed) A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Routledge Falmer, 2010.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the University of Glasgow Learning and Teaching Development Fund who provided funding for the project. In addition, we wish to thank Nissin Dental Inc, Kyoto, Japan for donating preparation plates. We are grateful also to Mr Robert McKerlie, University Teacher, Glasgow Dental School and Dr Catherine Bovill, Senior Lecturer, Learning and Teaching Centre, University of Glasgow. Our thanks also go to the dental students of Glasgow Dental Hospital and School who participated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cameron, D., Binnie, V., Sherriff, A. et al. Peer assisted learning: teaching dental skills and enhancing graduate attributes. Br Dent J 219, 267–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.722
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.722
