Key Points
-
Explores patients' journey through the two-week wait referral process and makes suggestions for improving patients' experiences.
-
Identifies the top nine most commonly urgently referred benign conditions in this cohort.
-
Encourages discussions about more innovative ways of triaging referrals and oral cancer detection education.
Abstract
Objectives i) To prospectively explore patients' experience through the two-week wait (2WW) referral process; ii) To compare the relative true malignancy diagnostic rate between general medical practitioners (GMPs) and general dental practitioners (GDPs) over a six-month period; iii) To compare management of 2WW referral cases between GMPs and GDPs before the referral and during the 2 weeks in regards to symptomatic support, investigations in primary care, and information communicated to patients and secondary care clinicians; iv) To investigate the benign conditions that comprise 2WW referrals by finding out the final diagnoses of all cases included in the study.
Method The patient inclusion criteria were all 2WW referral patients who attended consultation clinics during the six-month study period in Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust. We prospectively distributed patient questionnaires and clinician's referral assessment forms. We obtained the final diagnoses of all participants electronically, and also identified all malignancies diagnosed via routine referral route during the study period from the cancer services team.
Results Two hundred and twenty patients referred via 2WW pathway participated in the study. Of these, 148 referrals were from GMPs and 72 from GDPs. The overall malignancy diagnostic yield was 6.2%; markedly higher from GMPs (9.5%) than GDPs (1.4%), and higher number than those from routine pathway. The GMPs and GDPs showed similar levels of clinical management and information exchange judging from the participants' responses. We also identified the top nine most commonly urgently referred benign conditions.
Conclusion We reiterate the need for improved communication between clinicians and patients and between clinicians. We also suggest more focus on education in commonly encountered conditions as well as malignant lesions. The number of 2WW referrals we received from GMPs was nearly twice as many as those from GDPs, highlighting the importance of delivering oral medicine education to medical students, trainees and GMPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Department of Health. The NHS cancer plan. London, 2000.
Department of Health. The new NHS: modern, dependable. London, 1997.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. London, 2005.
Lyons M, Philpott J, Hore I, Watters G . Audit of referrals for head and neck cancer – the effect of the 2week, fast track referral system. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004; 29: 143–145.
Shah H V, Williams R W, Irvine G H . Fast-track referrals for oral lesions: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 44: 207–208.
McKie C, Ahmad U A, Fellows S et al. The 2-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer in the United Kingdom: Referral patterns, diagnostic efficacy of the guidelines and compliance. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 851–856.
Williams C, Byrne R, Holden D, Sherman I, Srinivasan V R . Two-week referrals for suspected head and neck cancer: two cycles of audit, 10 years apart, in a district general hospital. J Laryngo Otol 2014; 128: 720–724.
Schnetler J F C . Oral cancer diagnosis and delays in referral. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 210–213.
Carter L M, Ogden G R . Oral cancer awareness of general medical and general dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2007; 203: 248–249.
Greenwood M, Lowry R J . Primary care clinicians' knowledge of oral cancer: a study of dentists and doctors in the North East of England. Br Dent J 2001; 191: 510–512.
Department of Health (2002) Achieving the 2week Standard: Questions and Answers. Available online at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4054826.pdf (accessed in May 2016).
Brocklehurst P R, Baker S R, Speight P M . Factors which determine the referral of potentially malignant disorders by primary care dentists. J Dent 2010; 38: 569–578.
Richards M . Cancer ten years on: improvements across the whole care pathway. London: Department of Health, 2007.
Brocklehurst P R, Rafiq R, Lowe D, Rogers S . Analysis of the impact of deprivation on urgent suspected head and neck cancer referrals in the Mersey region between January 2004 to December 2006. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50: 215–220.
Morton C, Downie F, Auld S et al. Community photo-triage for skin cancer referrals: an aid to service Delivery. J Clin Exp Derm 2011; 36: 248–254.
Rafiq R, Brocklehurst P R, Rogers S N . Effect of Mouth Cancer Awareness Week on urgent suspected head and neck cancer referrals. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51: e183–e185.
Rodgers J, Macpherson L M, Smith G L, Crighton A J, Carton A T, Conway D I . Characteristics of patients attending rapid access clinics during the West of Scotland Cancer Awareness Programme oral cancer campaign. Br Dent J 2007; 202: 680–681.
Haughney M G J, Devennie J C, Macpherson L M D, Mason D K . Integration of primary care dental and medical services: a three year study. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 343–347.
Rogers S N, Vedpathak S V, Lowe D . Reasons for delayed presentation in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: the patients perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49: 349–353.
Shanks L A, Walker T W M, McCann P J, Kerin M J . Oral cavity examination: beyond the core curriculum? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49: 640–642.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Cancer Services team and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery team at the Royal Cornwall Hospital for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, B., Shaikh, Z., Adcock, S. et al. Two-week wait false alarms? A prospective investigation of 2WW head and neck cancer referrals. Br Dent J 220, 521–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.376
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.376
This article is cited by
-
An audit to analyse the two-week wait pathway at an oral cancer specialist district general hospital
British Dental Journal (2020)
-
Inappropriate referrals
British Dental Journal (2020)
-
A review of the electronic two-week rule referrals for head and neck cancer to Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
British Dental Journal (2019)
