Key Points
-
Demonstrates foundation trainer concerns for the current standards of new dental graduates.
-
Identifies areas of concern in particular clinical standards, and trends of both improvement and decline in certain areas.
-
Suggests a lack of congruence between dental schools, foundation training and the GDC with respect to the training of undergraduates.
Abstract
Background There have been anecdotal concerns that the skill mix of recently qualified graduates is very different to those qualifying several years ago, in particular that the clinical skills on qualification are less. If true, such changes may have ramifications for providers of undergraduate training, postgraduate training, particularly at foundation training level, and ultimately the public.
Aim The aim of this study was to assess changes in perceived standards of newly qualified graduates as reported by foundation trainers.
Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-completed internet-based survey tool sent to all foundation trainers (FTs) in England, Northern Ireland and Wales.
Results A total of 312 responses were obtained covering all postgraduate deaneries. There was mixed opinion regarding standards of new graduates, with 51% reporting that the overall standard of those entering foundation training was 'unsatisfactory'. Standards in key clinical areas were considered unsatisfactory by large proportions of respondents. Eighty-five percent considered standards to be unsatisfactory in 'crown and bridge', 75% in 'extraction of teeth', 74% in endodontics, 67% in removable prosthodontics, and 62% in treatment planning. Experienced trainers identified a decline in standards in particular clinical areas.
Conclusions A large proportion of foundation trainers consider the current standard of new graduates to be unsatisfactory for entering foundation training. There are a number of key clinical areas of concern and a perception of declining standards.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Patel J, Fox K, Grieveson B, Youngson C C . Undergraduate training as preparation for vocational training in England: a survey of vocational dental practitioners' and their trainers' views. Br Dent J 2006; Suppl: 9–15.
Brookman DJ . Vocational trainees' views of their undergraduate endodontic training and their vocational training experience. Int Endod J 1991; 24: 178–186.
Stewardson, D A, Shortall A C, Lumley P J . Endodontics and new graduates, Part 2: Undergraduate experience and course evaluation. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2003; 11: 15–21.
Wieder M, Faigenblum M, Eder A, Louca C . An investigation of complete denture teaching in the UK: part 2. The DF1 experience. Br Dent J 2013; 215: 229–236.
Clark R K, Radford D R, Juszczyk A S . Current trends in complete denture teaching in British dental schools. Br Dent J 2010; 208: 214–215.
Bartlett D W, Coward P Y, Wilson R, Goodsman D, Darby J . Experiences and perceptions of vocational training reported by the 1999 cohort of vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in England and Wales. Br Dent J 2001; 191: 265–270.
Buck D, Malik S, Murphy N et al. What makes a good dentist and do recent trainees make the grade? The views of vocational trainers. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 563–566.
General Dental Council. Standards for Education. Available online at https://archive.gdc-uk.org/Aboutus/education/Documents/Standards%20for%20Education%20(v2%20revised%202015).pdf (Accessed February 2017).
General Dental Council. The First Five Years. Available online at https://archive.gdc-uk.org/Aboutus/education/Documents/TheFirstFiveYears.pdf (Accessed September 2015).
General Dental Council. Preparing for Practice. Available online at https://archive.gdc-uk.org/Aboutus/education/Documents/Preparing%20for%20Practice%20(revised%202015).pdf (accessed September 2015).
COPDEND. A Curriculum for UK Dental Foundation Programme Training. 2015. Available online at http://www.copdend.org//data/files/Foundation/DFTCurriculum_FINALDRAFT_2015%20(2).pdf (accessed August 2015).
Grace M . Confidence and competence. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 155.
Ali K, Tredwin C, Kay E J, Slade A, Pooler J . Preparedness of dental graduates for foundation training: a qualitative study. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 145–149.
General Dental Council. Transition to Independent Practice. Available at https://archive.gdc-uk.org/Aboutus/Thecouncil/Meetings%202013/7%20Transition%20to%20Independent%20Practice.pdf (accessed September 2015).
Gilmour A S, Jones R J, Cowpe J G, Bullock A D . Communication and professionalism skills of a new graduate: the expectations and experiences of dental foundation trainers. Eur J Dent Edu 2014; 18: 195–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oxley, C., Dennick, R. & Batchelor, P. The standard of newly qualified dental graduates – foundation trainer perceptions. Br Dent J 222, 391–395 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.226
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.226
This article is cited by
-
Removable prosthodontics education and experience in the United Kingdom, from undergraduate to foundation training
British Dental Journal (2025)
-
From inputs to outputs: an analysis of the changes to learning outcomes for dental undergraduate education in the UK
British Dental Journal (2022)
-
Mind the 'GAPP': a pre-graduation assessment of preparedness for practice amid a pandemic
British Dental Journal (2022)
-
Supporting the transition from recent graduate to trainee; the Educational Transition Document
BDJ In Practice (2022)
-
Preparing dental students for independent practice: a scoping review of methods and trends in undergraduate clinical skills teaching in the UK and Ireland
British Dental Journal (2021)
