Key Points
-
Describes the views of dental registrants in difficulty on the support they receive form postgraduate dental teams.
-
Compares their views on what constitutes the ideal supporter with the professional experience of supporters and their views on the strengths they bring to the role.
-
Describes the views of registrants and supporters on the funding of the service.
-
Reports the registrants' experience of support they receive from other organisations.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this research was to investigate the views of dental registrants in difficulty (DRiDS) on the support they received from postgraduate dental teams (PgDT) in Health Education England (HEE) and other sources. These data were complemented by the views of those appointed from the PgDT to support them on the service they provide.
Method Qualitative data were collected by recording one-to-one semi structured telephone interviews, lasting approximately 30 minutes, with registrants in difficulty and supporters purposefully sampled from across England and Wales. Recordings were transcribed and the interview data analysed for recurring discourses and themes using thematic framework analysis.
Setting and subjects All regional leads for DRiDs services in PgDT across the UK were asked to invite the DRiDs they were in contact with and the supporters they had appointed to contact the research team. Attempts were made to contact all who returned consent forms and six DRiDs and 11 supporters were eventually interviewed.
Results Overall the DRiDs thought that the PgDT were very helpful. They were in many cases the only source of expert support and advice, particularly with regard to developing a personal development plan and collecting evidence about their practice to present to the regulator. There was a good match between the qualities that DRiDs wanted their supporters to have and the strengths supporters felt they brought to the role. The DRiDs had mixed views about the support provided by their indemnifiers and could not identify any other organisations that provided support once conditions had been imposed. Some had the support of peers; but both DRiDs and supporters felt there was a need for further support in addition to the educational support provided by PgDT and legal support provided by the indemnifier.
Conclusion The DRiDS regarded the PgDT as their primary source of support and, in general, were very satisfied with the character and competence of the service.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Pearce M, Agius S J, Macfarlane J, Taylor N . Supporting dental registrants in difficulty. Br Dent J 2015; 218: E5.
Morrow G, Burford B, Kergon C, Illing J . Addressing performance concerns. Br J Healthcare Management 2010; 16: 436–442.
Medical Protection Society. Memorandum and articles of association. 2015. Available online at http://www.medicalprotection.org/docs/default-source/pdfs/financial-information/mps_memoarts_june-2013.pdf (accessed June 2016).
Nursing and Midwifery Council. Annual Fitness to Practise Report 2014–2015. 2015. Available online at https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/annual_reports_and_accounts/ftpannualreports/annual-ftp-report-2014-2015.pdf (accessed July 2016).
Royal College of Nursing. Capability and performance standards and reviews. Available online at https://www.rcn.org.uk/get-help/rcn-advice/capability-and-performance-standards-and-reviews (accessed June 2016).
General Medical Council. Effective governance to support medical revalidation. A handbook for boards and governing bodies. 2013. Available online at http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Governance_handbook.pdf (accessed July 2016).
Humphrey C . Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30: 26–36.
Pearce M, Agius S, Macfarlane J, Taylor N . Supporting dental registrants in difficulty: the service provided by postgraduate dental education teams. Br Dent J 2016; 220: 443–446.
Ritchie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W . Carrying out Qualitative Analysis. 2011. In Ritchie J, Lewis J (Editors) Qualitative Research Practice. pp. 218–262. 2011. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.
Bryman A . Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
General Dental Council. Evaluation of Remediation Support in UK Dentistry. 2015. Available online at https://www.gdc-uk.org/api/files/Evaluation%20of%20Remediation%20Support%20in%20Dentistry%20report%20FINAL%20May%202015.pdf (accessed June 2016).
Beyondblue. Doctors' Mental Health Program. Available online at https://www.beyondblue.org.au/about-us/about-our-work/workplace-mental-health/about-the-doctors-mental-health-program (accessed June 2016).
Peer Assistance Services. For Dentists. Available online at http://peerassistanceservices.org/programs/peer-health-assistance-programs/dental-program/ (Accessed June 2016).
NHS. NHS Practitioner Health Programme. Available online at http://php.nhs.uk/ (accessed December 2016).
NHS. NHS GP Health Service. Available online at https://www.england.nhs.uk/gp/gpfv/workforce/health-service/ (accessed December 2016).
General Dental Council. Support during fitness to practise procedures. Available online at https://www.gdc-uk.org/professionals/ftp-prof/support (accessed June 2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Postgraduate Dental Deans & Directors and those responsible for managing the service for DRiDS within PgDTs their help in developing this project and continued support. We would also like to thank the registrants in difficulty and their supporters from PgDTs for agreeing to be interviewed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearce, M., Agius, S., Macfarlane, J. et al. Is the support that dental registrants in difficulty receive from postgraduate dental teams and other sources adequate?. Br Dent J 222, 771–775 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.454
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.454
This article is cited by
-
Risk management: An upstream approach
British Dental Journal (2017)
