Key Points
-
Discusses the causes of defensive dentistry.
-
Discusses differences in approaches to dentistry by older and younger dentists
-
Invites the profession to have a wider debate about the challenges of defensive dentistry.
Abstract
Introduction Defensive dentistry has become a popular choice for dentists in practice over the past decade, partly in response to the supposed increasing risks to patient safety, of litigation and of health and safety concerns to patients and staff.
Methods Using a quantitative analysis, care plans of 96 dentists were examined from one day in April 2017 and compared against these known risks. One thousand four hundred and seventeen care plans were coded by treatment type. The risks of completing each item were coded as high or low for either clinical risk, health and safety risk and risk of litigation. Subsequently, semi structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants; five practitioners of over 25 years' experience and seven practitioners of less than five years' experience.
Results All assessments and treatments, including no treatment, had recognised risks. 'Doing nothing' also carried a risk of litigation. Four themes were identified from the interviews: 'there by the grace of God, go I', 'limitations on the scope of practice', 'fear' and 'c'est la vie'.
Discussion The profession is at a crossroads. The options for the future are discussed, including immediate retraining for all dental care professionals.
Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, it is concluded that increasingly, no risk or only low risk treatments will be undertaken by the profession, with both experienced and less experienced practitioners limiting their scope of practice, with possible deleterious consequences on the dental health of the population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Gazing K-S . Personal communication. 2017.
Holden A . Misguided fear. 2014. Available at http://www.the-dentist.co.uk/archive/article/3018/misguided-fear (accessed September 2017).
Hancocks S . Defensive dentistry. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 543.
Hancocks S . Defensive dentistry. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 327.
MedicineNet.com. Defensive medicine. Available at http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=33262 (accessed September 2017).
Umesan K, Chua K, Balakrishnan P . Prevention and management of accidental foreign body ingestion and aspiration in orthodontic practice. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2012; 8: 245–252.
Oguz Eroglu, O, Algan-Kaya, H, Coskun F . A potentially fatal complication that may occur during dental treatment: 'foreign body aspiration'. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 20: 36.
Hou R, Zhou H, Kaijin H et al. Thorough documentation of the accidental aspiration and ingestion of foreign objects during dental procedure is necessary: review and analysis of 617 cases. Head Face Med 2016; 12: 23.
Bertram A, Rao A, Akbiyik K, Haddad S, Zoud K . Maxillary tuberosity fracture: a life-threatening haemorrhage following simple exodontia. Aust Dent J 2011: 56; 212–215.
Shaw F E Jr, Barrett C L, Hamm R et al. Lethal outbreak of hepatitis B in a dental practice. JAMA 1986; 255: 3260–3264.
Dental Protection. Riskwise. 2017. Available at https://www.dentalprotection.org/docs/librariesprovider4/dpl-publications/riskwise-australia.pdf?sfvrsn=14 (accessed September 2017).
Barlean L, Iancu L, Minea M, Danila I, Baciu D . Airborne microbial contamination in dental practices in Lasi. Romania Oral Health Dent Manag Black Sea Countries 2010; 9: 16–20.
Oxley C J, Dennick R, Batchelor P . The standard of newly qualified dental graduates –foundation trainer perceptions. Br Dent J 2017; 222: 391–395.
Green J, Thorogood N . Qualitative Methods for Health Research, 2nd ed. Sage Pub Ltd: London, 2009.
Clark, R K F, Radford, D R, Juszczyk A S . Current trends in complete denture teaching in British dental schools. Br Dent J 2010; 208: E10.
Hellyer P H The older dental patient-who cares? Br Dent J 2011; 211: 109–110.
General Dental Council. Outcomes and appeals list. Available at https://olr.gdc-uk.org/hearings (accessed September 2017).
Acknowledgements
PH acknowledges that he has way too much time on his hands and DR is silent on the matter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hellyer, P., Radford, D. An evaluation of defensive dentistry: w(h)ither the profession?. Br Dent J 223, 885–888 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.996
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.996
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation of dentists’ malpractice fears and defensive dentistry attitudes: a scale development
BMC Oral Health (2025)
-
Note bloat
British Dental Journal (2025)
-
Defensive dentistry beyond litigation
British Dental Journal (2025)
-
Defensive dentistry: perceptions and experiences among general dental practitioners in primary care
British Dental Journal (2025)
-
Wimpole Timings study
British Dental Journal (2024)
