Figure 2
From: Towards real-time image deconvolution: application to confocal and STED microscopy
Performance comparison between the SGP and RL algorithms.
(a,b) Number of iterations and computational time as a function of image size for CLSM (a) and STED microscopy (b). All the test compared the CPU-based implementations. Each point represents the mean and the standard deviation of 20 different realizations, in particular 10 different noise realizations for 2 different phantom realizations. Same conditions of Figure 1.
