Table 1 Comparisons of the magnification M of both the blurring and clear images among the experimental data, the calculated data by using the F obtained by ZEMAX and the calculated data by using the F obtained by CST. While calculating the magnifications, we first get F from both ZEMAX and CST. Then, we calculate the magnifications of the images by using the paraxial ray-tracing formulae
From: Experimental imaging properties of immersion microscale spherical lenses
| Â | Experimental M of the images (immersed) | Experimental M of the images (not immersed) | Calculated M by using the F obtained from ZEMAX | Calculated M by using the F obtained from CST | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
d (μm) | blurred images | clear images | blurred images | clear images | immersed F = 5.9 (μm) | non-immersed F = 4.6 (μm) | immersed F = 3.5 (μm) | non immersed F = 3.0 (μm) |
0 | 3.07× | 2.08× | 4.05× | N/A | 1.70× | 2.11× | 3.31× | 5.40× |
3.1 | −1.64× | 1.52× | −1.14× | N/A | 15.68× | −5.08× | −1.71× | −1.18× |
4.1 | −1.19 | 1.51× | −0.85× | N/A | −9.49× | −2.42× | −1.15× | −0.85× |