Table 1 Distribution of dysregulated ceRNA network signatures Gain/loss of MI indicates that the removal of a particular cluster from the MI calculation increases/decreases the MI between ceRNA interactions
From: 3′UTR shortening identifies high-risk cancers with targeted dysregulation of the ceRNA network
Consensus cluster | Significantly dysregulated genes | Loss of MI | Gain of MI |
|---|---|---|---|
Cluster 1 (high-risk) | 182 | 0 | 5185 |
Cluster 2 (low-risk) | 20 | 0 | 162 |
Cluster 3 (low-risk) | 7 | 0 | 22 |
Cluster 4 (medium-risk) | 29 | 109 | 4 |
