Table 4 Meta-analysis of the association between ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk

From: Potentially functional polymorphisms in the ERCC2 gene and risk of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Chinese populations

 

No. of studies

   GG vs. TT

   TG vs. TT

   GG vs. TG/TT

   TG/GG vs. TT

Variables

OR (95% CI)c

P OR a

P het b

OR (95% CI)d

P OR a

P het b

OR (95% CI)c

P OR a

P het b

OR (95% CI)d

P OR a

P het b

All

19

1.28 (1.08–1.52)

0.005

0.075

1.15 (1.01–1.30)

0.030

0.025

1.19 (1.01–1.40)

0.034

0.231

1.17 (1.02–1.33)

0.020

0.004

Ethnicity

             

Asian

11

1.36 (0.97–1.91)

0.078

0.165

1.16 (1.00–1.35)

0.050

0.141

1.28 (0.92–1.80)

0.140

0.176

1.18 (1.01–1.39)

0.115

0.052

Non-Asian

8

1.26 (1.03–1.54)

0.025

0.071

1.14 (0.90–1.43)

0.276

0.019

1.16 (0.97–1.40)

0.110

0.331

1.14 (0.90–1.45)

0.267

0.007

Histological type

            

Squamous Cell

12

1.33 (0.98–1.79)

0.064

0.152

1.17 (1.01–1.37)

0.039

0.083

1.20 (0.90–1.60)

0.216

0.200

1.19 (1.01–1.40)

0.034

0.028

Adenocarcinoma

6

1.26 (1.02–1.55)

0.036

0.048

1.09 (0.85–1.41)

0.500

0.023

1.18 (0.97–1.44)

0.095

0.215

1.11 (0.85–1.44)

0.448

0.008

Other

1

3.13 (0.13–77.85)

0.486

0.076

1.33 (0.57–3.08)

0.507

--

3.03 (0.12–75.19)

0.499

--

1.42 (0.62–3.26)

0.404

--

Publication Bias e

 

0.955

  

0.414

  

0.970

  

0.497

 
  1. aP value of the Z-test for odds ration test.
  2. bP value of the Q-test for heterogeneity test.
  3. cFixed-effects model.
  4. dRandom-effects model.
  5. eP value of Egger's test for publication bias.