Table 2 Locus-locus jointeffects in associations between CASP7 genotypes and cervical cancerrisk

From: CASP7 variants modify susceptibility to cervical cancer in Chinesewomen

Locus-locus joint effect

Genotype

Cases

Controls

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)a

P a

P hom

rs12247479

rs4353229

GG

CC/CT

823 (55.4)

749 (57.6)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.076

   

TT

330 (22.2)

274 (21.1)

1.10 (0.91–1.32)

0.340

1.07 (0.87–1.30)

0.532

 
  

AG/AA

CC/CT

121 (8.1)

130 (10.0)

0.85 (0.65–1.11)

0.223

0.88 (0.67–1.16)

0.374

 
   

TT

212 (14.3)

148 (11.4)

1.30 (1.03–1.64)

0.028

1.24 (0.97–1.58)

0.089#

 
  

AG/AA-TT vs. others

   

1.29 (1.03–1.62)

0.026

1.23 (0.97–1.55)

0.091#

 

rs10787498

rs4353229

TT

CC/CT

717 (48.3)

663 (51.0)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.070

   

TT

212 (14.3)

194 (14.9)

1.01 (0.81–1.26)

0.927

1.00 (0.79–1.26)

0.975

 
  

GT/GG

CC/CT

227 (15.3)

216 (16.6)

0.97 (0.78–1.20)

0.793

1.01 (0.81–1.27)

0.902

 
   

TT

330 (22.2)

228 (17.5)

1.33 (1.09–1.63)

0.005

1.28 (1.04–1.58)

0.021

 
  

GT/GG-TT vs. others

   

1.34 (1.11–1.62)

0.002

1.27 (1.04–1.55)

0.017

 
 

rs12247479

TT

GG

929 (62.5)

852 (65.5)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.102

   

AG/AA

0

5 (0.4)

——

 

——

  
  

GT/GG

GG

224 (15.1)

171 (13.1)

1.21 (0.97–1.51)

0.091#

1.21 (0.97–1.50)

0.095#

 
   

AG/AA

333 (22.4)

273 (21.0)

1.12 (0.93–1.35)

0.223

1.12 (0.93–1.34)

0.248

 
  

1–2 putative risk genotypes vs.0 risk genotype

   

1.16 (0.99–1.35)

0.065#

1.15 (0.98–1.34)

0.078#

 

rs1127687

rs4353229

GG

CC/CT

675 (45.4)

629 (48.4)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.877

   

TT

221 (14.9)

175 (13.5)

1.18 (0.94–1.48)

0.158

1.11 (0.87–1.41)

0.397

 
  

AG/AA

CC/CT

269 (18.1)

250 (19.2)

1.00 (0.82–1.23)

0.980

0.99 (0.80–1.23)

0.911

 
   

TT

321 (21.6)

247 (19.0)

1.21 (0.99–1.47)

0.063#

1.17 (0.95–1.44)

0.149

 
  

AG/AA-TT vs. others

   

1.17 (0.97–1.41)

0.094#

1.14 (0.94–1.39)

0.178

 
 

rs12247479

GG

GG

655 (44.1)

578 (44.4)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.016

   

AG/AA

241 (16.2)

226 (17.4)

0.94 (0.76–1.17)

0.576

0.94 (0.75–1.17)

0.596

 
  

AG/AA

GG

498 (33.5)

445 (34.2)

0.99 (0.83–1.17)

0.885

0.98 (0.82–1.17)

0.833

 
   

AG/AA

92 (6.2)

52 (4.0)

1.56 (1.09–2.23)

0.015

1.48 (1.02–2.15)

0.040

 
  

AG/AA-AG/AA vs. others

   

1.57 (1.11–2.22)

0.012

1.49 (1.03–2.14)

0.033

 
 

rs10787498

GG

TT

498 (33.5)

451 (34.7)

1.00

 

1.00

 

0.007

   

GT/GG

398 (26.8)

353 (27.1)

1.02 (0.84–1.24)

0.831

1.03 (0.84–1.26)

0.795

 
  

AG/AA

TT

431 (29.0)

406 (31.2)

0.96 (0.80–1.16)

0.678

0.96 (0.79–1.17)

0.680

 
   

GT/GG

159 (10.7)

91 (7.0)

1.58 (1.19–2.11)

0.002

1.52 (1.13–2.06)

0.006

 
  

AG/AA-GT/GG vs. others

   

1.58 (1.21–2.07)

0.001

1.52 (1.15–2.01)

0.004

 
  1. OR,odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
  2. aObtainedin logistic regression models with adjustment for age, age at primiparity,menopausal status, BMI
  3. homHomogeneitytest
  4. #Boardlinesignificance
  5. Theresults were in bold, if P <0.05