Table 1 Comparison of recently published clearing methods. Main characteristics of different clearing methods reported in literature. We considered adult mouse brain as typical sample. This table gives an overview of available techniques and their limitations and advantages.

From: A versatile clearing agent for multi-modal brain imaging

Method

Clearing composition

Refractive index

Linear deformation

Protein fluorescence quencing

Sample characteristic

High viscosity

Cost*

Clearing time

Immunostaining compatibility

Clearing capability

References

Et + BABB

Ethanol Benzyl alcohol Benzyl Benzoate

1.54

Shrinkage

Yes

Stiff

No

$

2 days

No

Good

7

THF + DBE

Thetrahydrofuran Dibenzyl ether

1.56

Shrinkage

Yes

Stiff

No

$

2 days

No

Good

8

iDISCO

Thetrahydrofuran Dibenzyl ether

1.56

Shrinkage

Yes

Stiff

No

$$

2 days

Yes

Good

9

Glycerol

Glycerol solution

1.44

No

No

/

Yes

$

2 days

No

Moderate

/

Sca/e

Urea Glycerol Triton X-100

1.38

Expansion

No

Fragile

No

$

Months

No

Moderate

10

SeeDB

Fructose saturated α thioglycerol

1.49

No

No

/

Yes

$

2 weeks

No

Moderate

11

ClearT

Formamide Polyethylene glycol

1.45

No

No

/

No

$

1 day

No

Moderate

12

CUBIC

Urea Aminoalcohols

1.47

Transient swelling

No

/

No

$$

2 weeks

Yes

Good

13

CLARITY

FocusClear

1.45

Transient swelling

No

Spongy

No

$$$

10 days

Yes

Good

14

CLARITY2

PBST

1.33

/

No

Spongy

No

$$

12 days

Yes

Good

21

TDE

2,2' Thiodioethanol

Tunable

No

No

/

No

$

2 hours

No

Moderate

/

CARITY + TDE

2,2' Thiodioethanol

Tunable

Transient swelling

No

Spongy

No

$$

10 days

Yes

Good

/

  1. *Cost was considered for both labeling and clearing and was indicated as inexpensive ($) if less than $50, medium ($$) if between $50 and $500 and expensive ($$$) for over $500 per sample.